On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:51:37 +0100 (BST), G.W. Haywood wrote
> Hi there,
> 
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 Brian Morrison wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:59:29 +0100 G.W. Haywood wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Luca Gibelli wrote:
> > >
> > > > ... release candidate for 0.94.
> > >
> > > I started to download it, but when I saw that it was going to be just
> > > under 20 megabytes I cancelled it.
> >
> > Well it's not *that* big!
> 
> My point was that it's ten times as big as it should be and apparently
> it's growing without bound.  This is because it contains a database,
> which is of course probably a useless copy of the one already on the
> machine which will be running the new version of clamav.  If it isn't,
> that's most probably because it's out of date, and it will be deleted.
> 
> It's insane.
> 

I agree with the sentiment, but it's not quite insane.
I think it is quite reasonable to provide a complete package that will give 
reasonable
protection straight "out of the box".

Perhaps we could have two versions; one with a recent database, and one with an 
empty
database. Then let the user decide which he requires.

Cheers and thank for all the hard work.
Bill

--
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
www.maidment.vu
Consultant to Elgas Ltd
Phone: 02 9904 3364

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to