On 3/16/07, Dana Kashubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/15/07 7:04 PM, John Rudd wrote:
> Dana Kashubeck wrote:
>> I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X Server
>> 10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there, most of them
>> are shown while compiling unrar.
Hi
I have upgraded my 0.88.7 installations (round about 120 servers)
to the new 0.90.1. A proofscript tests always one time per day,
if main.cvd exists.
So on 40 servers the main.cvd does not exist. For that the file
is in main.inc/main.db.
But I don't understand why some servers have the old mai
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:16:06 +0100
Jens Strohschnitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What can I do to make all installation use main.cvd or main.inc/main.db,
> so that I can edit or leave my proofscript ?
Can't your script simply check for both .inc and .cvd?
--
oo. Tomasz Koj
On 3/16/07, Jens Strohschnitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have upgraded my 0.88.7 installations (round about 120 servers)
to the new 0.90.1. A proofscript tests always one time per day,
if main.cvd exists.
So on 40 servers the main.cvd does not exist. For that the file
is in main.inc/main.
> > What can I do to make all installation use main.cvd or main.inc/main.db,
> > so that I can edit or leave my proofscript ?
>
> Can't your script simply check for both .inc and .cvd?
>
Hi,
hm, yes - but my question is why are there different files
in my singature-folder ?
___
> > I have upgraded my 0.88.7 installations (round about 120 servers)
> > to the new 0.90.1. A proofscript tests always one time per day,
> > if main.cvd exists.
> > So on 40 servers the main.cvd does not exist. For that the file
> > is in main.inc/main.db.
>
> After a main.cvd update, if you hav
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:29:32 -0500
> Alex Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700
>> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at
>>> the instant a new database is be
Hi,
during debuging the performance/HIGH-CPU-problem in Solaris10, I found severeal
times this:
LibClamAV debug: Signature offset: 10620, expected: 0
(Trojan.Downloader.Bat.Ftp.gen-6)
LibClamAV debug: Signature offset: 10620, expected: 0
(Trojan.Downloader.Bat.Ftp.gen-5)
LibClamAV debug: Signatur
Hello Jens,
> Editing scripts to proof both paths is very difficult, because there are 5
> different versions on all 120 servers. So there is a lot to do to edit
> the scripts.
> Is there no other way, to activate main.cvd or main.inc on all servers ?
no,
Best regards
--
Luca Gibelli (luca _
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Sergio Bortsov(Global Ukraine Lan ISP),
On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
> I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
> enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
> Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
> Help please.
Versions of FreeBSD <= 5.5 are
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Sergio Bortsov(Global Ukraine Lan ISP),
sergio wrote:
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
My compile farm only has 4.11, but clamAV build
sergio schrieb:
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
I have Clamav-0.90.1 running and comp
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:38:16 +0100
Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Jens,
>
> > Editing scripts to proof both paths is very difficult, because there are 5
> > different versions on all 120 servers. So there is a lot to do to edit
> > the scripts.
> > Is there no other way, to ac
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:59:35 +0100
Jens Strohschnitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so I don't know about, how one server has main.cvd and the other one has
> main.inc. :-(((
Edwin has already described that in this thread.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\..
Hello Matthias,
Friday, March 16, 2007, 1:40:44 PM, you wrote:
> sergio schrieb:
>> Hello clamav-users,
>>
>> I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
>> enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
>> Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Versions of
Hi, Clamav-Users,
some minutes ago I've installed the binary version
clamav-0.90.1.sol10-x86.tar.gz
on a x86-machine running under solaris 10.
If I start clamscan or freshclam I get the error message
ld.so.1: clamscan: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.2: symbol __gmpz_in
I set up ClamAV and clamav-milter for the first time a few months ago.
I used 0.90rc2 at the time. I have been meaning to update it for a
while but didn't get around to it until yesterday. I tried 0.90.1, but
it ate up the CPU and logged errors. For comparison, I also checked
0.90 and 0.90rc3 an
From: "jean-paul natola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 90 disasters- revert to .88
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:38:32 -0400
From: "Török Edvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Hello,
Yesterday I ugraded clamav to 90.1. All went fine and the software worked
well but today in the morning clamd retreived new signatures and:
> Mar 16 11:34:10 192 freshclam[36963]: Database updated (99431 signatures)
> from db.pl.clamav.net (IP: 212.14.28.36)
followed by:
Mar 16 11:36:00
On Friday 16 March 2007 06:26 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
> >> I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
> >> enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
> >> Clamav
Are the System Requirements for Clam AntiVirus listed anywhere? It
seems to me that this would have helped several people who have had
issues with 0.90. I couldn't find anything, but maybe I missed it.
--
-
Dana Kashubeck
Systems Manager
Riemer Reporting Se
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
Are the System Requirements for Clam AntiVirus listed anywhere? It
seems to me that this would have helped several people who have had
issues with 0.90. I couldn't find anything, but maybe I missed it.
There's a start here: http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/ClamRequirements.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:39:23 +0100
"Zbigniew Szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday I ugraded clamav to 90.1. All went fine and the software worked
> well but today in the morning clamd retreived new signatures and:
>
> > Mar 16 11:34:10 192 freshclam[36963]: Database update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sergio,
do you have libgmp on your system ?
If yes, do the following:
setenv CFLAGS "-O2 -I/usr/local/include"
setenv LDFLAGS "-s -L/usr/local/lib"
./configure ...
The "-L/usr/local/lib" is to make sure, if libgmp is in /usr/local/lib,
it will be
On 16 Mar 2007, at 15:39, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I ugraded clamav to 90.1. All went fine and the software
worked
well but today in the morning clamd retreived new signatures and:
Mar 16 11:34:10 192 freshclam[36963]: Database updated (99431
signatures)
from db.pl.clama
Hello,
> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated as it was several hours
> before I spotted this and manually restarted clamd. Oddly, mail was still
> being delivered, but without any virus checks ??
Ok, this is what I meant - clamd was not working. I had to manually
restart it. However, I mus
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated as it was several hours
before I spotted this and manually restarted clamd. Oddly, mail was still
being delivered, but without any virus checks ??
Ok, this is what I meant - clamd was not working. I had to manually
resta
Hello,
> Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a legitimate
> condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is reject, but
> certainly more drastic and likely to create political repercussions. Worst
> is to silently drop messages.
It tempfails them, which is fine
On 16 Mar 2007, at 17:20, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a legitimate
condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is
reject, but
certainly more drastic and likely to create political
repercussions. Worst
is to silen
What does the -e or --external do?
Thanks,
Ken
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andreas [iso-8859-1] M?rdter wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 00:11, John Fleming wrote:
> > >> - And the clamav log is free of errors and indicated that the database
> > >> is updated appropriately and clamd is being notifie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:11:20PM -0400, John Fleming wrote:
>>>- And the clamav log is free of errors and indicated that the database is
>>>updated appropriately and clamd is being notified of changes.
>
>OK, clamav is finding viruses again, but th
On 3/16/07, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16 Mar 2007, at 17:20, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a legitimate
>> condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is
>> reject, but
>> certainly more drastic and like
On 16 Mar 2007, at 19:16, Török Edvin wrote:
On 3/16/07, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16 Mar 2007, at 17:20, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a
legitimate
>> condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too i
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 not
findingviruses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:11:20PM -0400, John F
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> X-Virus-Status: Yes
> X-Virus-Report: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with clamscan / ClamAV
--
oo.
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1
notfindingviruses
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
X-Virus-Status:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
X-Virus-Status: Yes
X-Virus-Report: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with clamscan / ClamAV
Tha
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:14PM -0400, John Fleming said:
> That's not different though, from when it was logging the viruses to
> clamav.log.
> If you look at clamassassin, it does call clamscan, but again, it USED to
> log virus names to clamav.log.
I have this idea that something in that p
John Fleming wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1
notfindingviruses
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1not
findingviruses
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
"John Fleming" <[E
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users]
0.90.1notfindingviruses
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:14PM -0400, John Fleming said:
That's not different though, from
44 matches
Mail list logo
