[Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello clamav-users, i've just tried to use 0.85 and 0.85.1 instead of my 0.84 but i found an error massage on starting clamav-milter ("Permission denied"). is there any chance to solve this little problem? p.s. sorry about my english... -- Best regards, Sergey

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Davis
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Todd Lyons wrote: > From: Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ClamAV users ML > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 10:14:26 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts? > Reply-To: ClamAV users ML ... > Some ISP's don't allow you to relay mail through them if it's

RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam's daily.cvd messages not showing

2005-05-17 Thread Randal, Phil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running clamav (currently version 0.85) on two separate > servers and my home notebook and recently noticed odd > behavior when running freshclam. > While on one server and my notebook it always both displays > to the console and logs information about bot

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:50:58 +0800 "Awie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I cannot run Freshclam in DNS mode, it always fall back to HTTP. Below > attached the message from my machine; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freshclam > ClamAV update process started at Tue May 17 12:43:32 2005 > WARN

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 17 May 2005 11:16:54 +0400 Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello clamav-users, > >i've just tried to use 0.85 and 0.85.1 instead of my 0.84 but i >found an error massage on starting clamav-milter ("Permission >denied"). is there any chance to solve this little problem? I

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Guy Van Den Bergh
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:12, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:50:58 +0800 > "Awie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours. > > [...] > > > but why Freshclam cannot run in DNS? What things should I fix? > > System time? Or maybe your local DNS server

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Krištof Petr
Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Tue, 17 May 2005 11:16:54 +0400 Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello clamav-users, i've just tried to use 0.85 and 0.85.1 instead of my 0.84 but i found an error massage on starting clamav-milter ("Permission denied"). is there any chance to solve this little probl

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:55:36 +0200 Krištof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sergey is right. This bug is not fixed. > > > May 17 12:36:41 server clamd: clamd startup succeeded > May 17 12:36:41 server clamd[27991]: HTML support enabled. > May 17 12:36:41 server clamd[27991]: Self checking every

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Tomasz, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:58:41 PM, you wrote: TK> On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:55:36 +0200 TK> Krištof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sergey is right. This bug is not fixed. >> >> >> May 17 12:36:41 server clamd: clamd startup succeeded >> May 17 12:36:41 server clamd[27991]: HTML

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Tomasz, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:27:00 PM, you wrote: TK> On Tue, 17 May 2005 11:16:54 +0400 TK> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello clamav-users, >> >>i've just tried to use 0.85 and 0.85.1 instead of my 0.84 but i >>found an error massage on starting clamav-milter ("Permi

Re: Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:10 +0400, Sergey wrote: > > what do you mean by "properly"? > there were no errors while i was installing it. > i used just the same option that i used for installing 0.84 or there > is in 0.85 some "new extra installation stuff" that i missed? > Check the permission

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 17 May 2005 15:10:12 +0400 Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Tomasz, > > Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:27:00 PM, you wrote: > > TK> On Tue, 17 May 2005 11:16:54 +0400 > TK> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hello clamav-users, > >> > >>i've just tried to use 0.85 and 0.85

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Krištof Petr
Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:55:36 +0200 Krištof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sergey is right. This bug is not fixed. May 17 12:36:41 server clamd: clamd startup succeeded May 17 12:36:41 server clamd[27991]: HTML support enabled. May 17 12:36:41 server clamd[27991]: Self checkin

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Tomasz, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:17:34 PM, you wrote: TK> On Tue, 17 May 2005 15:10:12 +0400 TK> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello Tomasz, >> >> Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:27:00 PM, you wrote: >> >> TK> On Tue, 17 May 2005 11:16:54 +0400 >> TK> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>

Re[4]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Trog, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:13:49 PM, you wrote: T> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:10 +0400, Sergey wrote: >> >> what do you mean by "properly"? >> there were no errors while i was installing it. >> i used just the same option that i used for installing 0.84 or there >> is in 0.85 some "ne

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 16, 2005, at 5:43 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: Most of the spam I've gotten the last three days is from comcast.net. Apparently they allow their customers to send out to port 25. They should lock that down so that spam goes out through their own servers so they can feel the pain when they ar

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Sergey wrote: [...] > -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log ^^ How clamd (in realy user clamav.clamav) can write to this file?? [...] -- Andrzej Zawadzki ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.h

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Awie
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:12, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:50:58 +0800 > > "Awie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours. > > > > [...] > > > > > but why Freshclam cannot run in DNS? What things should I fix? > > > > System time? System t

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Awie
Hello, > > System time? > > Or maybe your local DNS servers. > > I had a similar problem a few weeks ago. > I was using Windows 2000 DNS servers, and they were having trouble > caching the TXT record for ClamAV updates. Restarting the DNS server > services on the Windows machines helped me out. >

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread John Jolet
One final point here, I know I, and I'm sure many of you, have seen or come into contact with infected exchange serverson static ip addresses. The fact that it's static, or in fact, a business connection, speaks not a thing for the competence of the administrator, or the security of the ser

Re: Re[4]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:44 +0400, Sergey wrote: > T> Check the permissions on your log file. They must be accessible by the > T> user the milter runs as. > > T> -trog > > > they are accesseble > No they aren't. Actually look at the file permissions this time. -trog signature.asc Descript

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Kriљtof, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:22:21 PM, you wrote: KP> Tomasz Kojm wrote: >>On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:55:36 +0200 >>Kriљtof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Sergey is right. This bug is not fixed. >>> >>> >>>May 17 12:36:41 server clamd: clamd startup succeeded >>>May 17 12:3

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Bill Maidment
Sergey wrote: Hello Kriљtof, KP> # grep User /etc/clamd.conf KP> User clamav Shouldn't the conf files be in /usr/local/etc/ ??? That's how it works for me and my log file is owned by clamav Cheers Bill -- What's the difference between Linux and Windoze? Linux - Thousands of programmers are worki

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Guy Van Den Bergh
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 13:53, Awie wrote: > Below the result of dig in my machine. It seems can reach > current.cvd.clamav.net. > > Please advise. > ===SNIP=== > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# dig current.cvd.clamav.net txt > > ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> current.cvd.clamav.net txt > ;; global options:

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Sergey wrote: > i've just noticed the same thing. clamd.log is made by root. but 0.84 > doesn't care about that it works properly. Yes -- this is what I posted about Sat morning. Previous to 0.85, clamav-milter didn't care if it couldn't write to it's log file. Starting wi

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Andrzej, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:52:31 PM, you wrote: AZ> Sergey wrote: AZ> [...] >> -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log AZ> ^^ AZ> How clamd (in realy user clamav.clamav) can write to this file?? AZ> [...] i've no idea, but 0.84 does

Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Sergey wrote: > >> -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log > AZ> ^^ > i've no idea, but 0.84 does. To be more helpfull -- 0.84 can't write to it either, it just ran anyway. Make sure whatever script you use the cycles log fil

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 17, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Alan Premselaar wrote: Jef Poskanzer wrote: ..snip... And finally, if you want to run a check on the HELO string, I find that just rejecting outside connections that claim a HELO of your own hostname gets rid of a very high proportion of crapmail. This very simple chec

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bart Silverstrim said: > > On May 16, 2005, at 5:43 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Most of the spam I've gotten the last three days is from comcast.net. >> Apparently they allow their customers to send out to port 25. They >> should >> lock that down so that spam goes out through their own servers

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Maidment said: > Sergey wrote: >> Hello Krištof, >> > > >> KP> # grep User /etc/clamd.conf >> KP> User clamav >> > > Shouldn't the conf files be in /usr/local/etc/ ??? > That's how it works for me and my log file is owned by clamav > That is dependant upon who built the binaries and the choic

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Mr Mailing List
Hello, On 17 May 2005, at 13:17, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Tue, 17 May 2005 15:10:12 +0400 Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Tomasz, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:27:00 PM, you wrote: TK> On Tue, 17 May 2005 11:16:54 +0400 TK> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello clamav-users, i've just tried

[Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail from www.webmail.us/testvirus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Douglas Ward
I have recently installed Clam AV 0.85 and have downloaded the latest updates through freshclam. We are running this software on a new e-mail gateway server built with Postfix and Mandrake LE2005. Please excuse my ignorance as I am very new to this product. My question is that with clamd runn

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Awie
> This looks fine to me. > My DNS servers were messing up the expiration time (900 seconds right > here, as it should be...). > > In my freshclam.conf, I have a section that says: > > # Use DNS to verify virus database version. Freshclam uses DNS TXT > records > # to verify database and software ve

Re: Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christopher X. Candreva said: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Sergey wrote: > >> i've just noticed the same thing. clamd.log is made by root. but 0.84 >> doesn't care about that it works properly. > > Yes -- this is what I posted about Sat morning. > > Previous to 0.85, clamav-milter didn't care if it could

Re: Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Sergey said: > Hello Andrzej, > > Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:52:31 PM, you wrote: > > AZ> Sergey wrote: > AZ> [...] >>> -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log > AZ> ^^ > AZ> How clamd (in realy user clamav.clamav) can write to this file?? > > AZ> [...]

Re: Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: > You will have solved the problem only if you put this procedure in your > startup scripts and any tools that rotate your logs. Gee, I wish I had already posted that -- oh wait, I did. == Chris

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Guy Van Den Bergh
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:09, Awie wrote: > I use a new freshclam.conf. > > > -- > > What is your configuration? > > Does it have a DNSDatabaseInfo directive? > > Maybe you're still using a configuration file from a previous version, > > from before the DNSDatabasInfo days? > > Below attached lin

Re[4]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Sergey
Hello Dennis, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 5:11:43 PM, you wrote: DP> Sergey said: >> Hello Andrzej, >> >> Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:52:31 PM, you wrote: >> >> AZ> Sergey wrote: >> AZ> [...] -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log >> AZ> ^^ >> AZ> How

Re: Re[2]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christopher X. Candreva said: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> You will have solved the problem only if you put this procedure in your >> startup scripts and any tools that rotate your logs. > > Gee, I wish I had already posted that -- oh wait, I did. > Not completely, and not at

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Bill Maidment
Dennis Peterson wrote: Bill Maidment said: Sergey wrote: Hello Krištof, KP> # grep User /etc/clamd.conf KP> User clamav Shouldn't the conf files be in /usr/local/etc/ ??? That's how it works for me and my log file is owned by clamav That is dependant upon who built the binaries and the choices th

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Awie
> > > > Below attached lines in the file > > All is looking good as far as I'm concerned. > I would start sniffing on your server (with ethereal) to see what's > happening on the wire. Any experience with that? > I never use Ethereal (for Linux) before. However, I will learn how to use it. I will

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Sergey wrote: Hello Dennis, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 5:11:43 PM, you wrote: DP> Sergey said: Hello Andrzej, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:52:31 PM, you wrote: AZ> Sergey wrote: AZ> [...] -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log AZ> ^^ AZ> How clamd (in realy

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail from www.webmail.us/testvirus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 09:05 -0400, Douglas Ward wrote: > I have recently installed Clam AV 0.85 and have downloaded the latest updates > through freshclam. > We are running this software on a new e-mail gateway server built with > Postfix and Mandrake LE2005. > Please excuse my ignorance as I a

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Guy Van Den Bergh
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:34, Awie wrote: > > > > All is looking good as far as I'm concerned. > > I would start sniffing on your server (with ethereal) to see what's > > happening on the wire. Any experience with that? > > > > I never use Ethereal (for Linux) before. However, I will learn how to u

Re: Re[4]: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Sergey said: > Hello Dennis, > > Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 5:11:43 PM, you wrote: > > DP> Sergey said: >>> Hello Andrzej, >>> >>> Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:52:31 PM, you wrote: >>> >>> AZ> Sergey wrote: >>> AZ> [...] > -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log >>> AZ>

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter and key "--max-children"

2005-05-17 Thread Andrey Nekrasov
Hello, 1. Why clamav-milter ignores a key "--max-children=N"? I start with key "--max-children=5", but I receive: # pstree init-+-atd |-bdaemon |-bdflush |-bserver |-clamav-milter---clamav-milter---16*[clamav-milter] 2. /usr/local/clamav/sbin/clamav-milter -h|grep Maximum

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:17:34PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm said: > The only 'essential' information you have provided is that > clamav-milter prints "Permission denied" on startup so don't expect > constructive help from me. The problem here is that clamav opens/creates the log at clamd/clamd.c:144, bu

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail from www.webmail.us/testvirus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Ken Jones
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 09:05 -0400, Douglas Ward wrote: > >> I have recently installed Clam AV 0.85 and have downloaded the latest >> updates through freshclam. We are running this software on a new e-mail >> gateway server built with Postfix and Mandrake LE2005. Please excuse my >> ignorance as

RE: [Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail fromwww.webmail.us/testvirus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Douglas Ward
Do you by chance know of any resources that I could look at that would outline how to plug the two together? Thanks! Douglas Ward Director of Information Technology NC Methodist Conference 1307 Glenwood Ave. Raleigh, NC 27605 Work: (919) 832-9560 ext. 227 Fax: (919) 834-7989 -Original Mes

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jim Maul said: >> >> >> >> DP> We have a winner! Now if you put that in your startup script and log >> DP> rotation tool you'll have the job finished. >> >> why is that? if i'll restart clamd it won't going to change the >> permissions of clamd.log. and by the way i don't need any log rotation >>

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 17, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: Bart Silverstrim said: To me, that price is learning how to do it right. Price isn't always monetary. I wouldn't argue with the idea of having to tell your provider that you need your particular connection unfiltered and leave it unfiltered beca

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Stephen Gran said: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:17:34PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm said: >> The only 'essential' information you have provided is that >> clamav-milter prints "Permission denied" on startup so don't expect >> constructive help from me. > > The problem here is that clamav opens/creates the l

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Dennis Peterson wrote: Jim Maul said: DP> We have a winner! Now if you put that in your startup script and log DP> rotation tool you'll have the job finished. why is that? if i'll restart clamd it won't going to change the permissions of clamd.log. and by the way i don't need any log rotation bec

[Clamav-users] AES encrypted zips causing scan error

2005-05-17 Thread Chris Masters
Hi All, WinZip 9 256 bit AES encrypted zip files cause errors [tested against 0.85.1]. We're calling clam from MIMEDefang and the scan returns an error. Other encrypted zip files scan OK. Is there any way round this as we have users wanting to get these files through? Thanks, Chris LibClamA

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Damian Menscher
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Bart Silverstrim wrote: After yet another day of putting up with all this crap from viruses, there's a part of me that wonders what would happen if someone wrote a virus that would pull a sober.p "infectinfectinfect...sleep...payload" trick where instead of turning the compu

RE: [Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail fromwww.webmail.us/testv irus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Randal, Phil
Douglas Ward asked: > Do you by chance know of any resources that I could look at > that would outline how to plug the two together? Thanks! Have a look at MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info). Cheers, Phil Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK ___

[Clamav-users] Re: virus passing through clamav-milter, but not through clamdscan!

2005-05-17 Thread Apostolos Papayanakis
Hi evrybody I first posted this a week ago, but I still have not found a solution. Since v0.84, I've been receiving various obviously crafted mails that contain viruses, but pass through clamav-milter ok. However, when I save the mail and scan the mbox file with clamdscan (not cla

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jim Maul said: > Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >> That would be a good trick if the directory it is found in is owned ro >> by >> root. I suppose it could be created by root then chowned to clam_user, >> but >> that too presumes much. To make it entirely turnkey the process should >> see >> if the use

[Clamav-users] Problem creating temporary file

2005-05-17 Thread Karl Boyken
I've installed ClamAV 0.83 on an HP-UX 11.11 system. I'm running clamd, and it's communicating with MIMEDefang 2.51 via a socket. Clamd is not able to unpack tar archives or compressed files. I've set and exported the TMPDIR, TMP, and TEMP environment variables in the init script that runs c

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:03:10AM -0700, Dennis Peterson said: > That would be a good trick if the directory it is found in is owned ro by > root. I suppose it could be created by root then chowned to clam_user, but > that too presumes much. To make it entirely turnkey the process should see > if

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Awie
Hi Guy, This is the captured text from Ethereal (Text mode) I open 2 screen console Screen 1: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# tethereal -F libpcap -f udp Capturing on eth0 0.00 202.136.73.3 -> 202.136.64.52 DNS Standard query TXT current.cvd.clamav.net 0.707822 202.136.64.52 -> 202.136.73.3 DNS

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Dennis Peterson wrote: Jim Maul said: Dennis Peterson wrote: That would be a good trick if the directory it is found in is owned ro by root. I suppose it could be created by root then chowned to clam_user, but that too presumes much. To make it entirely turnkey the process should see if the user-s

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail fromwww.webmail.us/testvirus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Morgan Smith
Douglas Ward wrote: >Do you by chance know of any resources that I could look at that would outline >how to plug the two together? Thanks! > > One of my favorite methods of using Postfix and ClamAV together is by using amavis-new http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ There was a nice set of ins

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Stephen Gran said: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:03:10AM -0700, Dennis Peterson said: >> That would be a good trick if the directory it is found in is owned ro >> by >> root. I suppose it could be created by root then chowned to clam_user, >> but >> that too presumes much. To make it entirely turnke

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Erich Titl
Stephen Gran wrote: ... So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? That does seem like a rather drastic set of solutions to a trivial to fix bug. Moving about 10 lines of code will fix the bug under discussion, might lead to problems with logging _before_ dropping privile

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 22:39 +0800, Awie wrote: > Hi Guy, > > This is the captured text from Ethereal (Text mode) > > I open 2 screen console > > Screen 1: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# tethereal -F libpcap -f udp add -V so we can see the packet details. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem creating temporary file

2005-05-17 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
> I've installed ClamAV 0.83 on an HP-UX 11.11 system. I'm > running clamd, and it's communicating with MIMEDefang > 2.51 via a socket. Clamd is not able to unpack tar > archives or compressed files. I've set and exported the > TMPDIR, TMP, and TEMP environment variables in the init > script

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:56:14PM +, Erich Titl said: > Stephen Gran wrote: > > >... > > > >So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? That > >does seem like a rather drastic set of solutions to a trivial to fix > >bug. Moving about 10 lines of code will fix the bug un

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam fall back to HTTP

2005-05-17 Thread Awie
THANKS A LOT to Tomasz, Guy, Daniel and others. I decide to use NTP to sync my machine time and it works !!! Freshclam run in DNS mode. My apologize to Tomasz for ignoring his advise to check system time. Again, thanks a lot. Thx & Rgds, Awie - Original Message - From: "Daniel J

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Dennis Peterson said: > Stephen Gran said: > > So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? > > Where did I say that? With syslog you touch a file and it starts > logging. Simple, effective. It can be the same with clam. No local > log

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem creating temporary file

2005-05-17 Thread Karl Boyken
Thanks. Both MIMEDefang and clamd are running as the same user, so that's not the problem. I had a similar problem. I had to make clamd run as the same user as my script. Check what user your MIMEDefang is running as. -- Karl Boyken, system administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303A MLH, Dept. of Com

[Clamav-users] Re: virus passing through clamav-milter, but not through clamdscan!

2005-05-17 Thread Jef Poskanzer
> I first posted this a week ago, but I still have not found a >solution. > > Since v0.84, I've been receiving various obviously crafted mails >that contain viruses, but pass through clamav-milter ok. However, when I >save the mail and scan the mbox file with clamdscan (not clamscan) >"

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: custom signature files

2005-05-17 Thread Morgan Smith
Jef Poskanzer wrote: >Hey, has anyone made or run across a signature file that matches >all windows executables and all archive formats? Seems like this >would be fairly easy to create. >--- >Jef > > Jef Poskanzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acme.com/jef/ >_

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: custom signature files

2005-05-17 Thread Jef Poskanzer
>>Hey, has anyone made or run across a signature file that matches >>all windows executables and all archive formats? Seems like this >>would be fairly easy to create. > >Since not all executables and archives are malicious, ClamAV may not be >the proper tool to use. I think ClamAV would be a fin

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam AV allows e-mail from www.webmail.us/testvirus through?

2005-05-17 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 09:05 -0400, Douglas Ward wrote: > I have recently installed Clam AV 0.85 and have downloaded the latest > updates through freshclam. We are running this software on a new > e-mail gateway server built with Postfix and Mandrake LE2005. How is postfix calling clamav? The Ma

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: virus passing through clamav-milter, but not through clamdscan!

2005-05-17 Thread Nigel Horne
I tried your test and got this, so your end is NOT passing this virus through clamav-milter: The original message was received at Tue, 17 May 2005 16:41:57 +0100 from bandsman.co.uk [127.0.0.1] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reason: 554

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Erich Titl
Stephen Gran wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:56:14PM +, Erich Titl said: Stephen Gran wrote: ... So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? That does seem like a rather drastic set of solutions to a trivial to fix bug. Moving about 10 lines of code will fix the

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Stephen Gran said: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Dennis Peterson said: >> Stephen Gran said: >> > So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? >> >> Where did I say that? With syslog you touch a file and it starts >> logging. Simple, effective. It can be the same

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:50:38PM +, Erich Titl said: > Stephen Gran wrote: > >On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:56:14PM +, Erich Titl said: > >>might lead to problems with logging _before_ dropping privileges > > > >What, in particular, are you thinking of? If the first thing clamd does > >is d

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Erich Titl said: >> > You could not log problems while dropping privileges, well basically it > might go to the (unwatched) console > Because I'm self-described "anal", I capture my console to a file with syslog and it is watched with automation and so is syslog. Here's to anal admins and self-he

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: custom signature files

2005-05-17 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 17, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Morgan Smith wrote: Jef Poskanzer wrote: Hey, has anyone made or run across a signature file that matches all windows executables and all archive formats? Seems like this would be fairly easy to create. --- Jef Jef Poskanzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acme

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Matt Fretwell
Sergey wrote: > KP> Clamav should create log file with same owner as defined in > KP> clamd.conf to work it properly. > > i've just noticed the same thing. clamd.log is made by root. but 0.84 > doesn't care about that it works properly. The response someone posted a few days ago regarding 'sof

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Matt Fretwell
Bart Silverstrim wrote: > Maybe even do a reverse check to see if there's a mail server on the > sending system...how many systems would break doing a check like that? The sending server isn't guaranteed to be a MX, so any DNS MX or reverse connection tests would fail. Matt __

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 17, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Matt Fretwell wrote: Bart Silverstrim wrote: Maybe even do a reverse check to see if there's a mail server on the sending system...how many systems would break doing a check like that? The sending server isn't guaranteed to be a MX, so any DNS MX or reverse connectio

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Matt Fretwell
Sergey wrote: > DP> We have a winner! Now if you put that in your startup script and log > DP> rotation tool you'll have the job finished. > > why is that? if i'll restart clamd it won't going to change the > permissions of clamd.log. and by the way i don't need any log rotation > because my clam

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Matt Fretwell
Jim Maul wrote: > > Call me old fashioned, but this is something I like to deal with > > myself. There's still a roll for the thinking admin. > No, dont get me wrong here, im not saying clamav should "predict" > anything. Nor should it have to deal with misconfigured software. This > is of co

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Kelson
Bart Silverstrim wrote: On May 17, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Matt Fretwell wrote: Bart Silverstrim wrote: Maybe even do a reverse check to see if there's a mail server on the sending system...how many systems would break doing a check like that? The sending server isn't guaranteed to be a MX, so any DNS

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Matt Fretwell wrote: Jim Maul wrote: Call me old fashioned, but this is something I like to deal with myself. There's still a roll for the thinking admin. No, dont get me wrong here, im not saying clamav should "predict" anything. Nor should it have to deal with misconfigured software. This

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Matt Fretwell
Jim Maul wrote: > > touch /var/log/test.log > > > > Now why does it create the logfile as root? > While i get your point, it is irrelevant because it should not log in > /var/log/ directly. It should log in /var/log/clamav/ The main point of my point, (I know that sounds weird), is that an

RE: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Jim Maul wrote: > Matt Fretwell wrote: >> Just to test, as an ordinary user, run: >> >> touch /var/log/test.log >> >> Now why does it create the logfile as root? >> > > While i get your point, it is irrelevant because it should not log in > /var/log/ directly. It should log in /var/log/clama

Re: [Clamav-users] sober.p and german adverts?

2005-05-17 Thread Bill Taroli
Matt Fretwell wrote: Bart Silverstrim wrote: Maybe even do a reverse check to see if there's a mail server on the sending system...how many systems would break doing a check like that? The sending server isn't guaranteed to be a MX, so any DNS MX or reverse connection tests would fail. But

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Matt Fretwell wrote: Jim Maul wrote: touch /var/log/test.log Now why does it create the logfile as root? While i get your point, it is irrelevant because it should not log in /var/log/ directly. It should log in /var/log/clamav/ The main point of my point, (I know that sounds weird), is that

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Matt Fretwell
Jim Maul wrote: > > The main point of my point, (I know that sounds weird), is that an > > admin who relies upon any piece of software to correctly create and > > set permissions on the logfile is asking for trouble. Clam is not > > alone in this. This is not a bug in Clam, it is poor admin te

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Matt Fretwell wrote: Jim Maul wrote: The main point of my point, (I know that sounds weird), is that an admin who relies upon any piece of software to correctly create and set permissions on the logfile is asking for trouble. Clam is not alone in this. This is not a bug in Clam, it is poor admin t

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jim Maul said: > Matt Fretwell wrote: >> Jim Maul wrote: >> >> Call me old fashioned, but this is something I like to deal with myself. There's still a roll for the thinking admin. >> >> >> >>>No, dont get me wrong here, im not saying clamav should "predict" >>>anything. Nor should it have

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Dennis Peterson wrote: Jim Maul said: Matt Fretwell wrote: Jim Maul wrote: Call me old fashioned, but this is something I like to deal with myself. There's still a roll for the thinking admin. No, dont get me wrong here, im not saying clamav should "predict" anything. Nor should it have to deal

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jim Maul said: > Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Jim Maul said: >> >>>Matt Fretwell wrote: >>> Jim Maul wrote: >>Call me old fashioned, but this is something I like to deal with >>myself. There's still a roll for the thinking admin. >No, dont get me wrong her

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: virus passing through clamav-milter, but not through clamdscan!

2005-05-17 Thread Jef Poskanzer
>I tried your test and got this, so your end is NOT passing this >virus through clamav-milter: I.e. "clamav-milter works for me, therefore it works for you, therefore you are doing something else wrong." This may be true but it's far from proven. Furthermore, if Apostolos' problem is like mine,

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Jim Maul
Dennis Peterson wrote: Jim Maul said: Dennis Peterson wrote: Jim Maul said: Matt Fretwell wrote: Jim Maul wrote: Call me old fashioned, but this is something I like to deal with myself. There's still a roll for the thinking admin. No, dont get me wrong here, im not saying clamav should "predi

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.85 & 0.81.1 tha same troubles with milter

2005-05-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jim Maul said: > Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> >>>To the program itself, no. If you tell it to log to / it will, however, >>>it SHOULDNT. See what im saying? To say that clamav *has* to create >>>the log file as root because only root can write to /var/log/ is >>>irrelevant to the issue. >> >> >>

  1   2   3   >