On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You're correct, clamav-milter won't listen on a TCP port, only on a local
> socket.
Wrong.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 02:42, Carl Thompson wrote:
> If clamav-milter is nothing but a portal so to speak and doesn't cause much
load thats fine but I thought clamav-milter now has clamd inherant in it (no
longer needing to communicate with clamd).
>
> This would increase the load of clamav-mi
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:55, Carl Thompson wrote:
> Sendmail must connect to clamav-milter not clamd directly but clamav-milter
> will not listen on a TCP port
Yes it will.
> Carl
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:00, Carl Thompson wrote:
> I looked at the document and it gives a milter rule for sendmail to connect
> to a remote clamav-milter process:
>
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
>
> and the install doc says to put
>
> CLAMAV_
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
complaining about receiving viruses so I don't think there is a p
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:39:41 +0200
christian laubscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 84rc1 (same in cvs) freshclam, manager.c:
>
> __cut__
>if(optl(opt, "on-update-execute"))
>arg = getargl(opt, "on-update-execute");
>else if((cpt = cfgopt(copt, "OnUpdateExecute")))
>
> Doug Hardie wrote:
> > I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
> > time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
> > lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
> > complaining about receiving viruses so I don't t
Thanks Rick, i will check the wiki.
Hans
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:00:28 -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote
> Hans Poo wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'am reposting to myself. Yesterday i made a question of the subject, i felt
> > really bad when someone respond me the answer was in the faq.
> >
> > I felt with
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
About the same here, almost one years worth of data
http://newmail.axess.com/qmailmrtg/clamd.html
Regards,
Rick
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Rick,
Would you mind sharing where you got the mrtg setup for cl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> R. Scott Baer
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2005 15:35
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Virus Volumes
>
>
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > About the same here, almost one yea
R. Scott Baer wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
About the same here, almost one years worth of data
http://newmail.axess.com/qmailmrtg/clamd.html
Rick,
Would you mind sharing where you got the mrtg setup for clamav, or if
you would mind sharing your setup/config ? This has been on my todo
list for
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:29:44AM -0400, Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
> > > I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
> > > time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
> > > lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
>
hello,
i have just updated my clamav to 0.83 and this is showing up in the log file
does anyone know what might my problem be or how to solve it ?
any advice would be appreciated
PS: the system is Fedora Core 2, Sendmail 8.12.11, and clamav 0.83
wilhelm
_
Hi Folks,
After installing the package, which went smoothly, and starting
the clamd-daemon with: ./clamd I got stuck.
Starting the daemon generated the following info in the clamd.log:
+++ Started at Wed Apr 13 18:05:00 2005
clamd daemon 0.83 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686)
Log fi
Wim Janssen wrote:
Hi Folks,
After installing the package, which went smoothly, and starting
the clamd-daemon with: ./clamd I got stuck.
Starting the daemon generated the following info in the clamd.log:
+++ Started at Wed Apr 13 18:05:00 2005
clamd daemon 0.83 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:21 +0200, Wim Janssen wrote:
>
> There is a daemon running, ps -ef | grep clam results into:
> root 8352 1 0 Apr13 ?00:00:00 lt-clamd
>
> >From here I expected that the command: SCAN, VERSION etc. became
> available from the prompt. But here is what I
On 4/14/05, Wilhelm du Plessis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have just updated my clamav to 0.83 and this is showing up in the log file
> does anyone know what might my problem be or how to solve it ?
>
> any advice would be appreciated
I'd advise posting the error...
--
Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> You're correct, clamav-milter won't listen on a TCP port, only on a
>> local socket.
>
> Wrong.
*removes foot from mouth* oops, sorry...
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/14/2005 at 9:14 AM Nigel Horne wrote:
>On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:00, Carl Thompson wrote:
>
>> I looked at the document and it gives a milter rule for sendmail to
>connect to a remote clamav-milter process:
>>
>> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet
> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote server
Remote to sendmail? Or remote to clamd? Or both?
> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 --external --server=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock"
>
> and I have to run clamd on that server so that clamav uses it
> externally to scan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Kiril Todorov
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2005 23:55
> To: ClamAV users
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Bagle-BB.rar
>
> Hello list,
>
> Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
> There seems
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Mark wrote:
> As a rule, I do not bother with 'devel' versions (an anti-virus program
> should, because of its often deeply ingrained use in the mail system,
> always be stable, IMHO). So I must say I am a bit distressed to hear that
> the current stable version (still 0.83) d
Kiril Todorov wrote:
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
Online scanners showed that only Macaffee, nod32 and clam catch those
new bagle variations.
S
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
Online scanners showed that only Macaffee, nod32 and clam catch those
new bagle variations.
So, admins - time t
Daniel wrote:
> Kiril Todorov wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
>> There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
>> the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
>>
>> Online scanners showed that only Macaffee, nod32 and
Hi Does anybody know of any nice http redirector/proxy
other than SCAVR (SquidClamAV Redirector). SCAVR has
to work with squid, which is too clumsy too me. I only
need the redirector functionality that can work with
clamav scanner. Thanks.
__
Do
We are Running SME Server 6.0.1.01 and Clamav 0.83. We have a loop
problem after upgrading clamav from 0.82 and 0.83. The problem is, that
some thing causes the clamscan program to loop infinitely, taking all
the available memory and stopping access to the internet. Some thing
like this was posted
Kiril Todorov wrote:
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
Could you please submit a sample to me (in a password protected zip file)?
The signatures [Wo
Hi Nigel,
Sorry I am not an expert of the C language. It may have difficulty for
me to trace the program. Any way, by turning the DEGUG on, what else do
I need to watch out?
Best Regards
Gene Leung
Nigel Horne wrote:
What is happening is that on this line:
snprintf(fullname, sizeof(fullname)
29 matches
Mail list logo
