David Blank-Edelman wrote:
Hmm, that's an interesting thought, though I'm running
exiscan-acl-4.34-21.patch which reportedly fixed that problem.
4.34? That's old. If I remember correctly, I had some problem with that
version as well.
Use (at least) exim 4.41. That's what I use here, and it runs
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:31:03 -0500 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian Bebeau"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just had this problem the other day on a new AMD64 box.
> >> Check the directory where libgmp is installed. I found it had
> >> the library and a libgmp.so.3 symlink to it, but I needed to
> >>
On Feb 18, 2005, at 3:04 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
4.34? That's old. If I remember correctly, I had some problem with
that version as well.
Use (at least) exim 4.41. That's what I use here, and it runs fine.
Both Solaris 8 and 9.
Yes, the version of exim is a little behind (they rev'd through t
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 23:52 -0500, David Blank-Edelman wrote:
> Hi-
>Thanks for such a great program and all of the work being put into
> it. We're having a nasty problem with clamd 0.8x (even with 0.83 which
> we just installed yesterday). After running for a while, it will decide
> to just
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, David Blank-Edelman wrote:
; Hi-
; Thanks for such a great program and all of the work being put into it. We're
; having a nasty problem with clamd 0.8x (even with 0.83 which we just installed
; yesterday). After running for a while, it will decide to just stop functioning
;
The signature will be updated on Monday (to better meet the official
specification). All clamdwatch users should upgrade to the latest
version as soon as possible to avoid problems similar to those from
2004.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http:
--
> This is very likely File::Scan.
Yes indeed. That was the problem. MimeDefang will use File::Scan if it's
there.
Thanks for the help.
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:12:45 +, Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This really looks like you're running out of some resource. That accept
> () failure is from the clamd primary socket. We will need to find out
> what the error is. Please try this patch:
> ...
We had a similar problem - Solar
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, David Blank-Edelman wrote:
From: Igor Brezac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How much memory does your clamd process consume when it stops running?
Hi Igor-
I haven't checked (the machine it is running on has plenty of memory and
swap), but I will check next time this happens. Would y
> If the lib is in /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/lib is in the
> shlib_dirs option in /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local, it should
> pick up on it.
>
The shlib_dirs option in /etc/rc.conf is currently empty. I tried
putting /usr/local/lib in there:
shlib_dirs="/usr/local/lib /usr/lib"
With no
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
Igor Brezac wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, David Blank-Edelman wrote:
Solaris 9, gcc built, Solaris 9 stock zlib (1.1.4)
I'm running clamd 0.83 on Solaris 9 compiled with gcc 3.4.2 and zlib 1.2.2.
The older zlib releases have been known to cause clamd to crash,
On Feb 18, 2005, at 4:12 AM, Trog wrote:
This really looks like you're running out of some resource. That accept
() failure is from the clamd primary socket. We will need to find out
what the error is. Please try this patch:
Hi Trog and Andy-
Thanks for your responses. I've just patched my sources
A solution I was going to implement was mailsnarf on GW1 but it does
snat and mailsnarf still logs mails with the source ip of GW1. Any
ideeas on how to overcome this ? (I think a comparison between "logged
ip headers'" time and "virii found @ MAIL SERVER" time improper.)
iptables snat rule:
SNAT
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Lesli St. Clair wrote:
Yes indeed. That was the problem. MimeDefang will use File::Scan if it's
there.
I don't know about CanIt, but in MIMEDefang you can set your filter to
only discard when the virus scanner reports back that it is a virus
(ignoring when it's "suspicious")
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, David Blank-Edelman wrote:
; On Feb 18, 2005, at 4:12 AM, Trog wrote:
;
; > This really looks like you're running out of some resource. That accept
; > () failure is from the clamd primary socket. We will need to find out
; > what the error is. Please try this patch:
;
; Hi Tr
> I don't recall what version of OpenBSD you're running... But when
> ClamAV was updated, it took me just a few minutes to apply the
> patches from the -CURRENT port to a pristine 0.83 source tree, and
> build from scratch. That was on both 3.5 and 3.6-STABLE.
>
> Benny
Figured I should write t
On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
The accept debug will at least tell us if you're running out of file
descriptors..
Roger.
# ndd /dev/tcp tcp_time_wait_interval
6
# pfiles `pgrep clamd` | grep rlimit
Current rlimit: 256 file descriptors
Current rlimit: 256 file descriptors
Hmmm.
David Blank-Edelman wrote:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
The accept debug will at least tell us if you're running out of file
descriptors..
Roger.
...
# pfiles `pgrep clamd` | grep rlimit
Current rlimit: 256 file descriptors
Current rlimit: 256 file descriptors
und
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
The signature will be updated on Monday (to better meet the official
specification). All clamdwatch users should upgrade to the latest
version as soon as possible to avoid problems similar to those from
2004.
Latest version of clamav, or clamdwatch?
Why is th
vaida bogdan wrote:
A solution I was going to implement was mailsnarf on GW1 but it does
snat and mailsnarf still logs mails with the source ip of GW1. Any
ideeas on how to overcome this ? (I think a comparison between "logged
ip headers'" time and "virii found @ MAIL SERVER" time improper.)
iptabl
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:45:54 -0600 (CST), Damian Menscher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Latest version of clamav, or clamdwatch?
Latest version of clamdwatch (0.7.1, as distributed with clamav 0.83).
> Why is the most recent version required (I'm assuming some new
> functionality is required, but
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, David Blank-Edelman wrote:
;
; Thanks for taking the time to look into this with me.
You could try the attached patch, which makes clamd increase its file
descriptor limit to the OS's maximum or the maximum safe value if
you're using select().
A.diff -r -u clamav-devel/clamd
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:45:54 -0600 (CST)
Damian Menscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > The signature will be updated on Monday (to better meet the official
> > specification). All clamdwatch users should upgrade to the latest
> > version as soon as pos
I have problems in my server mail, especially is the antivirus, I
have suse enterprise 9,0 with postfix+amavisd-new+clamav.
Clamav me this not stopping the post office with virus, that have an
attached file of format zip which has one password, to that it must
this?
Is question of configurat
I have problems in my server mail, especially is the antivirus, I
have suse enterprise 9,0 with postfix+amavisd-new+clamav.
Clamav me this not stopping the post office with virus, that have an
attached file of format zip which has one password, to that it must
this?
Is question of configuration
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:21:01 -0600
Instituto de Ingenieria Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have problems in my server mail, especially is the antivirus, I
> have suse enterprise 9,0 with postfix+amavisd-new+clamav.
>
> Clamav me this not stopping the post office with virus, that have an
hi,
i installed the clamav-0.83.tar.gz,and configrued it for local socket,then
installed the clamd and clamav-milter from /clamav-0.83//contrib/init/RedHat
to the /etc/init.d,then i changed to the directory /etc/init.d and run the
commmand "clamd start" ,clamd started successfuly without any err
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:22:50 -0600
Instituto de Ingenieria Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have problems in my server mail, especially is the antivirus, I
> have suse enterprise 9,0 with postfix+amavisd-new+clamav.
>
> Clamav me this not stopping the post office with virus, that have an
> at
shams rahman wrote:
i installed the clamav-0.83.tar.gz,and configrued it for local
socket,then installed the clamd and clamav-milter from
/clamav-0.83//contrib/init/RedHat to the /etc/init.d,then i changed to
the directory /etc/init.d and run the commmand "clamd start" ,clamd
started successful
Igor Brezac wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
My clamd is at 12mb process size currently. I haven't noticed memory
bloat in recent versions.
This is the starting clamd memory footprint. How many messages are
you scanning? 0.80 ran fine, I noticed the problem since 0.81...
It proc
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
Igor Brezac wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
My clamd is at 12mb process size currently. I haven't noticed memory
bloat in recent versions.
This is the starting clamd memory footprint. How many messages are you
scanning? 0.80 ran fine, I not
hi,
thanks for reply,i changed to the directory /etc/init.d and run the ./clamd
start and get the same error:
Starting clamd: execvp: No such file or directory
this is the chkconfig --list clamd output:
clamd 0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
and the clamd is installe
James Lick said:
> Igor Brezac wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My clamd is at 12mb process size currently. I haven't noticed memory
>>> bloat in recent versions.
>>>
>>
>> This is the starting clamd memory footprint. How many messages are
>> you scanning? 0.80 ran f
shams rahman wrote:
hi,
thanks for reply,i changed to the directory /etc/init.d and run the
./clamd start and get the same error:
Starting clamd: execvp: No such file or directory
this is the chkconfig --list clamd output:
clamd 0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
and t
Igor Brezac wrote:
This is how .80 ran for me. The recent service pack may have done
this. What is your os version, uname -v?
SunOS tcp.com 5.9 Generic_112233-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 Solaris
--
James Lick -- éåæ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/
__
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
Igor Brezac wrote:
This is how .80 ran for me. The recent service pack may have done this.
What is your os version, uname -v?
SunOS tcp.com 5.9 Generic_112233-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 Solaris
I am at Generic_117171-15, which is a lot newer and I am affra
Igor Brezac said:
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote:
>>
>
> I am at Generic_117171-15, which is a lot newer and I am affraid the
> latest patch is giving me problems. ;(
>
> --
> Igor
I'm using the same version with no problem. It works fine. Here are my
clamav build directives - it has w
37 matches
Mail list logo
