On Wednesday 04 Aug 2004 07:17, Damian Menscher wrote:
> static const char *localAddresses[] = {
> "^127\\.0\\.0\\.1$",
> "^192\\.168\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$",
> "^172\\.1[6-9]\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$",
>
On Saturday 24 Jul 2004 18:52, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Additional information:
> Virus: %v
> Daemon Name:{daemon_name}
0.75f now has improved template file handling. Thanks to you and to "Sergey Y. Afonin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for pushing me on this.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer
Jesse wrote:
> 2.) I'm thinking of writing a general purpose Email module for the OCaml
> programming language. However, I think the ClamAV project is PROOF
> that there are more ways to package email than any one person can
> count. ASCII, Unicode, MIME, TNEF, UPX, Base64, etc... the
The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
Mydoom.M that have been reported as "binary fragments".
They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Thanks,
-trog
--- clamav-0.75.1.dist/libclamav/scanners.c 2004-06-29 22:58:37.0 +0100
+++ clamav-0.75.1/libclamav/scanners.c 20
Dear all,
After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages "Virus intercepted" are
queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Thanks,
Martin Chan
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com
> Dear all,
>
> After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages "Virus intercepted" are
> queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Turn off scanning of local messages.
> Thanks,
> Martin Chan
-Nigel
---
This SF.Net email is sp
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 23:01, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2004, at 7:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Cody Dabb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:11 PM
> > Subject: [Clamav-users] Amavis-new
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 0.75f now has improved template file handling.
Most excellent!!
I'll give it a whirl when the next tarball is available.
Dan
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Trog wrote:
> The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
> Mydoom.M that have been reported as "binary fragments".
>
> They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Is this a one-time patch-against-0.75.1 or something that will show up in
the development tree?
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 18:27, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 08 Jul 2004 18:43, Robert Schmidt wrote:
> > This is happening pretty frequently, 2 or 3 times per day. I upgraded
> > from .70 to .74 to see if it made any difference. It didn't.
>
> Is 0.74b any better?
>
Thanks for your help in the
Over the past few days I've had a few reports of a virus getting
through, and while the sig database has that virus listed (sigtool -l),
I don't see any blocks in my messages log. I'm still running a slightly
older version of clamav on most my boxes (0.72) since there were some
issues with the
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Ryan Moore wrote:
> Over the past few days I've had a few reports of a virus getting
> through, and while the sig database has that virus listed (sigtool -l),
> I don't see any blocks in my messages log. I'm still running a slightly
> older version of clamav on most my boxes (0
On 5 Aug 2004, at 09:09, Trog wrote:
The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
Mydoom.M that have been reported as "binary fragments".
They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Thanks,
-trog
This 'MIGHT' be a dumb question, but then I might be dumb !!
How would one apply this
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:46 pm, Ryan Moore wrote:
> Such that if freshclam downloads a signature and if the
> signature has a 'engine version requirement' or some attribute that can
> be compared against the installed engine, if the installed engine isn't
> newer, give a nasty warning in the l
Nigel Horne wrote:
Dear all,
After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages "Virus intercepted" are
queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Turn off scanning of local messages.
But...that means that an infected machine on the LAN will be able to
send emails contained viruses usin
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:46 pm, Ryan Moore wrote:
Such that if freshclam downloads a signature and if the
signature has a 'engine version requirement' or some attribute that can
be compared against the installed engine, if the installed engine isn't
newer, give a nasty wa
This is predicated on the developers of the database incrementing the
"functionality level" when they make changes like this.
I'm still not sure I get it, but there seems to be some resistance to doing
this consistantly.
Some changes in detection seem to make it into CVS, and I think future
versi
On 5 Aug 2004, at 20:29, Robert wrote:
On 5 Aug 2004, at 09:09, Trog wrote:
The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
Mydoom.M that have been reported as "binary fragments".
They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Thanks,
-trog
This 'MIGHT' be a dumb question, but then I mi
On Thursday 05 Aug 2004 21:41, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
> >>Dear all,
> >>
> >>After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages "Virus intercepted" are
> >>queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
> >
> >
> > Turn off scanning of local messages.
> >
>
> But
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav (0.70rc-1). I
would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it continues to tell me there
are no updates available. So on to plan two. I'm going to install from the
RPMs but wasn't exactly sure of the process.
This is my plan.
1. Stop Mailsc
Dear users,
the development version of ClamAV is mature enough to start using it
instead of 0.7x stable releases. Please give it a try and report all
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-20040805.tar.gz
The above snapshot includes a new, memory efficient
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:46 pm, Ryan Moore wrote:
Such that if freshclam downloads a signature and if the
signature has a 'engine version requirement' or some attribute that can
be compared against the installed engine, if the installed engine isn't
Ken Goods wrote:
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav (0.70rc-1). I
would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it continues to tell me there
are no updates available. So on to plan two. I'm going to install from the
RPMs but wasn't exactly sure of the process.
This is my plan
Ken Goods wrote:
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav (0.70rc-1). I
would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it continues to tell me there
are no updates available. So on to plan two. I'm going to install from the
RPMs but wasn't exactly sure of the process.
This is my plan
Christopher McCrory wanted us to know:
>Once per week we send a newsletter out to many people. This takes ~10
>hours as it's not very optimized. One message per receipent, not one
>message -> many.
>clamd keeps failing over
>I added "--dont-scan-on-error " to the clamav-milter args, the
>freque
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:08:55 +0200
Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC freshclam doesn't even update the local database if your local
> installation has a too small "functionality level". I guess it was
Even if the f-level is smaller than required one freshclam still
attempts to upda
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Dear users,
the development version of ClamAV is mature enough to start using it
instead of 0.7x stable releases. Please give it a try and report all
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-20040805.tar.gz
The above snapshot includes a new
Thomas Lamy scribbled on Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:24 PM:
> Ken Goods wrote:
>
>> I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav
>> (0.70rc-1). I would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it
>> continues to tell me there are no updates available. So on to plan
>> two. I'm going to
Peter Bonivart scribbled on Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:23 PM:
> Ken Goods wrote:
>> I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav
>> (0.70rc-1). I would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it
>> continues to tell me there are no updates available. So on to plan
>> two. I'm going to
Ken Goods wrote:
Thanks Peter! More great tips! Especially the freshclam.conf/clamav.conf
explanation. I know I read somewhere that it was only used by clamd but
forgot until you mentioned it. I've been reading too much lately...
It's mentioned at the top of the file but since it's named in such a
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:08:55 +0200
Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IIRC freshclam doesn't even update the local database if your local
installation has a too small "functionality level". I guess it was
Even if the f-level is smaller than required one freshclam still
a
>
>
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > Dear users,
> >
> > the development version of ClamAV is mature enough to start using
it
> > instead of 0.7x stable releases. Please give it a try and report
all
> > bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
> >
&g
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
> > > bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
> I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
> files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 I
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
Hi,
What's that mean Jeremy ?
Regards,
Rick
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
Hi,
What's that mean Jeremy
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
Hi,
W
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> >> On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
> >>
> > bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
> >>
> >>> I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
> >>> fil
37 matches
Mail list logo
