Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:08:55 +0200
Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IIRC freshclam doesn't even update the local database if your local
installation has a too small "functionality level". I guess it was
Even if the f-level is smaller than required one freshclam still
attempts to update the database. All *.cvd databases are backward
compatible but older libclamav versions can't use some new features they
provide.
implemented with major database format changes in mind, like 0.72
simply won't load databeses with the new md5 hashes in it (it would
die).
Older versions just ignore internal hash databases in cvd files.
Sorry for the false alarm then.
Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
