On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 22 Jul 2004 17:45, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
>
> > In my opinion a bug that major should warrant a new release, if only 0.74a
> > or 0.74.1. Asking people to update to CVS to fix a serious bug doesn't make
> > sense.
>
> Tomasz and I are already i
>Upgraded tonight on our development box to clamav 0.75. After upgrading
>getting a lot of:
>
>ERROR: ScanStream: accept timeout.
>
>(Never received these errors on previous versions)
>
>Calling clamdscan from procmail with:
>:0
>* multipart
>{
>VIRUS=`/usr/local/bin/clamdscan --disable-summary --s
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 04:41:48 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sarky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all
> How do i load clamd before the service clamav-milter start in RH?
>
> Sorted out the service but i can not figure out in which init file i
> should put clamd, rc.local starts after i think.
>
>
The ChangeLog document for clamav 0.75 says:
* clamav-milter: Added --dont-wait and --advisory options ,
at Jun 29 there is:
* clamav-milter:Support --timeout option
and earlier template files for clamav-milter are mentioned. But
clamav-milter man page (0.75.tar.gz) seems to be very old and
On Friday 23 Jul 2004 08:20, Krzysztof Snopek wrote:
> The ChangeLog document for clamav 0.75 says:
> * clamav-milter: Added --dont-wait and --advisory options ,
> at Jun 29 there is:
> * clamav-milter: Support --timeout option
> and earlier template files for clamav-milter are mentioned. But
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
>
> I would hardly call 9 days "very old".
> clamav-milter.8 already has these options described in it and yes I did remember
> to commit to CVS.
Ah, now I see what is a problem. Doing 'cat clamav-milter.8' shows
(unformatted, of course) full man page with o
In clamdscan/client.c this was changed in 0.75:
@@ -129,6 +131,15 @@
server.sin_family = AF_INET;
server.sin_port = htons(port);
+peer_size = sizeof(peer);
+if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
+ perror("getpeername()");
+ mprintf("@Can'
On Friday 23 Jul 2004 09:30, Krzysztof Snopek wrote:
> and only when I remove those two .TP , 'man clamav-milter' shows all
> what's inside.
Please raise this at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Krzysztof Snopek
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK.
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:44:49 +1200
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI
>
> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/docs/avfs-security04/index.html
>
>
> They apparently have used ClamAV to base their "Oyster" AV on, and
> claim that it runs >4 times faster as a result.
The CVS version of ClamAV i
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:05:29AM +0100, Björn Ketelaars said:
> >Upgraded tonight on our development box to clamav 0.75. After upgrading
> >getting a lot of:
> >
> >ERROR: ScanStream: accept timeout.
> >
> >Calling clamdscan from procmail with:
> >VIRUS=`/usr/local/bin/clamdscan --disable-summary
* Rob Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040707 11:57]: wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get dazuko working with clamav under FreeBSD
> 4.10-PRERELEASE. I installed dazuko as stated on the dazuko website:
>
> dokus# kldstat
> Id Refs AddressSize Name
> 12 0xc010 1aabf4 kernel
> 3
Quoting Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
FYI
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/docs/avfs-security04/index.html
They apparently have used ClamAV to base their "Oyster" AV on, and claim
that it runs >4 times faster as a result.
One thing that I see immediately would be if clamd could cache a checksum of
a
Can someone please assist me in upgrading .70 to .75 on a
production machine. This is the first time I have ever done this and I want to ‘
watch ‘ someone upgrade it on my mailserver.
It’s a FreeBSD 5.2.1 with Qmail, Qmailscan, SA,
ClamAV
~Jeffrey Kroll
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 08:52, Jeffrey Kroll wrote:
> Can someone please assist me in upgrading .70 to .75 on a production
> machine. This is the first time I have ever done this and I want to ‘
> watch ‘ someone upgrade it on my mailserver.
The cleanest process would be:
unpack the old distributio
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> +peer_size = sizeof(peer);
> +if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
> + perror("getpeername()");
> + mprintf("@Can't get socket peer name.\n");
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +server.sin_addr.s_ad
Has anyone out there integrated ClamAV into Plesk 7? If so, how did you do
it? Plesk is so tightly integrated with qmail I want to see if someone else
had done it before tinkering around on a production system. FWIW, the system
Plesk is running on is a Mandrake 9.2 box.
Eric Merkel / MetaLINK Tec
Hello,
Wondering if anyone had seen an error like this one when running
freshclam. This is a fully patched FC1 server. We have other servers
like this (same setup) that do not experience this issue.
Any ideas why and fixes?
I have already tried adding a proxy server, reinstalling from RPM and
clamd 0.75 (called from clamav-milter) is segfaulting on me, I can't keep
it running for more than 1 or 2 messages. It seems to be doing this on mime
boundries. Here is debug output:
LibClamAV debug: parseEmailHeader 'Mime-Version: 1.0'
LibClamAV debug: parseMimeHeader: cmd='Mime-Version', arg
wrong list!
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
__
Newbie here - My lists are all set to be publicly viewable. However, when I
go to www.mydomain.com/mailman/listinfo, I get the page that says there are
no publicly viewable lists at that domain. However, if I go to any list's
admin page, login, and immediately logout without doing anything, and t
Operating system?
Please send me a sample which crashes on your machine, zipped with
password "virus" please.
-Nigel
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Christopher X. Candreva
> Sent: 23 July 2004 18:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
> > >Upgraded tonight on our development box to clamav 0.75. After upgrading
> > >getting a lot of:
> > >
> > >ERROR: ScanStream: accept timeout.
> > >
> > >Calling clamdscan from procmail with:
> > >VIRUS=`/usr/local/bin/clamdscan --disable-summary --stdout -`
>
> It appears that the patch to fix
>From the clamav-milter man page:
> Any occurance of strings in braces are
> replaced with the appropriate {sendmail-variable}. If
> the -t option is not given, clamav-milter defaults to a
> hardcoded message.
This is great... I've been waiting for this since the template
feature came out
* On 2004.07.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Dan O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From the clamav-milter man page:
> > Any occurance of strings in braces are
> > replaced with the appropriate {sendmail-variable}. If
> > the -t option is not given, clamav-milter defaults to a
> >
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Operating system?
Solaris 8, gcc 3.4.0 . Sorry.
> Please send me a sample which crashes on your machine, zipped with
> password "virus" please.
Will do -- but the mail that is crashing it isn't even a virus. Seems to be
spam however.
===
I am using clamav 0.67 on SuSE 9.0 and 0.70 on SuSE 9.1.
I used some previously quarantined messages identified by the 0.67 server
to test the new 0.70 and found many were also detected but Worm.Gibe.F was
missed by 0.70. Databases on the two systems are current and appear to be
the same size.
We have been successfully using clamassassin, in combination with clamav,
for several months. In an effort to reduce the load on our mail server, we
installed clamd and changed from the use of clamscan to clamdscan.
With clamd started, and /usr/local/bin/clamassassin variable CLAMSCAN set to
/usr
Mike McCandless wrote:
Thinking that maybe there is a permission problem somewhere, I commented out
TCPAddr (127.0.0.1) and TCPPort (3310) from /etc/clamav.conf and used the
LocalSocket option (/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock). Now email goes through
just fine, and quickly.
Can someone help me explain
28 matches
Mail list logo
