On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:20:03 +1000
Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is that if we could make the names of the processes more
> distinguishable and match the conf files (if any) then we remove the
> chance of error. For example clamscan could be renamed to scanclam
> (with NO s
Don Levey wrote:
Apr 27 21:38:54 davinci sendmail[7174]: i3S1csjm007174:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=700, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]
Apr 27 21:42:54 davinci sendmail[7174]: i3S1csjm007174: Milter
(clmilte
"Christian Hack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ???/ ?
?: news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm running an old RH6.2 based box, which does most things OK for now
(it's
> still kernel 2.2 though). I'm looking to upgrade soon, but would like to
get
> ClamAV going on it for now.
>
> When I ru
Hi
First of all: Kudos to the ClamAV team it's so useful in stopping worms.
On to my question:
For some reason, clamav is labelling almost each virus it finds in
incoming mail as "Win32.Mix" like so
Wed Apr 28 12:28:30 2004 ->
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mx2108314810947010970/data.rtf
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 05:57, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>
> >
> >Apr 27 21:38:54 davinci sendmail[7174]: i3S1csjm007174:
> >from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=700, class=0, nrcpts=1,
> >msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP,
> >daemon=MTA, relay=smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]
> >Apr
This is actualy a lot worse than I thought.
Apr 27 04:25:50 nameserver2 clamav-milter[4431]: ClamAv: private data
not NULL
Apr 27 04:25:50 nameserver2 clamav-milter[4417]: ClamAv: private data
not NULL
Apr 27 04:25:52 nameserver2 clamav-milter[4427]: ClamAv: private data
not NULL
Apr 27 04:25:5
Don Levey wrote:
On
My sendmail and sendmail-devel are both 8.12.8-9.90.
Is this known to cause problems? Thanks again!
-Don
I dont know. Perhaps you would like to try compiling
sendmail,libmilter,clamav from source?
---
This SF.
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 14:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > What DOES read clamav.conf?
>
> clamd, clamdscan, and clamav-milter. freshclam also looks at it to find
> out how to notify clamd if you have it set to notify clamd after updates.
> It _is_ in the various docs, you know :)
The RPM I'm using ha
Hello Tomasz,
Monday, April 26, 2004, 11:56:22 PM, you wrote:
TK> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:21:15 +0400
TK> Marin Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, clamav-users,
>>
>> Using Clamav above 3 month.
>> Now prepare to deal with realtime DRBL blocking for virus-source hosts
>> (above 100 host
We are using clamd and clamscan for our mail and are very pleased with
it. Keep up the good work.
I was wondering if it is possible to scan streams too (http-traffic, ...)?
Marc
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 at 13:42:07 +0200, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
>
> First of all: Kudos to the ClamAV team it's so useful in stopping worms.
>
> On to my question:
> For some reason, clamav is labelling almost each virus it finds in
> incoming mail as "Win32.Mix" like so
>
> Wed Apr 28 12:28:30 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>
>> On
>>
>> My sendmail and sendmail-devel are both 8.12.8-9.90.
>> Is this known to cause problems? Thanks again!
>> -Don
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I dont know. Perhaps you would like to try compiling
> sendmail,libmilter,clamav from source?
>
Well, I'm will
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Maimon
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan
>
>
>
>
> Jim Maul wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> >Exactly
I'm getting similar errors during make, however I can't see an answer in the
error ;-)
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I./zziplib-g -O2 -c -o matcher.lo `test -f 'matcher.c' || echo
'./'`matcher.c
../libtool: line 1: s
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
the database since the end of February 2004.
Tomasz,
thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
Here's the result of a fresclam:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr 28 16:00:00 2004
SECURITY WARNIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>
>> On
>>
>> My sendmail and sendmail-devel are both 8.12.8-9.90.
>> Is this known to cause problems? Thanks again!
>> -Don
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I dont know. Perhaps you would like to try compiling
> sendmail,libmilter,clamav from source?
>
You mentioned
Ralf Guenthner wrote:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr 28 16:00:00 2004
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES
main.cvd is up to date (version: 22, sigs: 20229, f-level: 1, builder:
tkojm)
daily.cvd is up to date (version: 291, sigs: 1072, f-level: 2, builder:
ccordes)
What
I actually had to load:
gnump
Description is GNU MP3 Streaming?? but once I installed that package it
all worked...
Running SuSE 9 pro
On Apr 23, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Alex S Moore wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:07, McWhirter,Julia wrote:
Can you just verify gmp-devel is part of gmp?
I think th
>> I'm getting similar errors during make, however I can't see an answer in the
>> error ;-)
>>
>>
>> depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
>> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
>> -I./zziplib-g -O2 -c -o matcher.lo `test -f 'matcher.c' || echo
>> './'`matcher
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 at 16:09:57 +0200, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
> >I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
> >the database since the end of February 2004.
>
> Tomasz,
> thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
> Here's the result of a fresclam
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ralf
> Guenthner
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clam assigns wrong virus name??
>
>
> > I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix
On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, 4:09:57 PM, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
>> I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
>> the database since the end of February 2004.
RG> Tomasz,
RG> thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
RG> Here's the result of a f
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:50:19 +0100
Huw Jenkins wrote:
>
>
> /usr/bin/ld: -o: multiply specified
> make[2]: *** [libclamav.la] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
Each time I have had a compilation error, it's been down to an oldish version
of gcc on t
gnu math precision
cH4os wrote on 4/28/2004 10:35 AM:
I actually had to load:
gnump
Description is GNU MP3 Streaming?? but once I installed that package it
all worked...
Running SuSE 9 pro
On Apr 23, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Alex S Moore wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:07, McWhirter,Julia wrote:
Ralf Guenthner wrote:
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
the database since the end of February 2004.
sigtool -l |grep -i mix
..
..
W32.Mix.1852
Tomasz,
thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
Here's the result of a fresclam:
ClamAV
Apologies for the top post, I've had a long day :(
I've made some progress, running $export SED=sed seems to fix the original
error. However I have another problem. The following error message will
hopefully shed some light on my problems:
/usr/bin/ld: -o: multiply specified
make[2]: *** [libclam
Greeting,
I just installed Clam on a Linux server. After installation, I run #clamscan
/usr/local/share/clamav/test, it found the virus, the output like this:
-
/usr/local/share/clamav/test/test1: ClamAV-Test-Signature FOUND
/usr
Wed Apr 28 12:28:30 2004 ->
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mx2108314810947010970/data.rtf
.scr: Win32.Mix FOUND
I am sure that is rather a sample of the Netsky worm, which other systems
running clam identify as "Worm.Somefool.xx"
What could be the cause of the wrong name?
Clamav is having it's own
Victor Yu wrote:
Greeting,
I just installed Clam on a Linux server. After installation, I run #clamscan
/usr/local/share/clamav/test, it found the virus, the output like this:
-
/usr/local/share/clamav/test/test1: ClamAV-Test-Sig
I currently have ClamAV (0.65) and Sendmail running on the same
server Pentium 200 MHz.
ClamAV scans inbound and outbound mails for Sendmail via local TCP
(localhost, port )
The performance is not that great given the specs of the server.
I have a Windows 2000 Advance Server on a AMD 2.6 GHz
Zoong Pham wrote:
Can I install ClamAV on the Window server and have it scanning
inbound and outbound mails for the mail server on the old Pentium ?
If you use clamav-milter, the answer is yes.
If you use other "glues" (e.g. mail-scanner, amavis, etc.) that depends
on the glue.
Try man clamav-
> -Original Message-
> From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 12:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV on Windows and Sendmail on Unix
> If you use clamav-milter, the answer is yes.
> If you use other "glues" (e.g. ma
Zoong Pham wrote:
The Windows server has cyswin installed as well.
Should I install ClamAV natively to windows or to cygwin?
I don't know how to install (read : compile) ClamAV natively to Windows
(using MS-VC or Borland CPP). If you know how, that would be great.
Just make sure you use the lat
> -Original Message-
> From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV on Windows and Sendmail on Unix
>
>
>> Latest CVS snapshot version (devel-20040429) compiles OK on cygwin.
> My bi
34 matches
Mail list logo
