On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:20:03 +1000 Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is that if we could make the names of the processes more > distinguishable and match the conf files (if any) then we remove the > chance of error. For example clamscan could be renamed to scanclam > (with NO scanclam.conf), clamdscan renamed as daemonclam (with > daemonclam.conf) or something like that. No way. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Wed Apr 28 09:50:40 CEST 2004
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
