At 14:49 21-04-2004 -0500, you wrote:
FYI. This is my last submission to the Mozilla Bugzilla that partially
addresses the needs of newbies who want a user-friendly gui or wizard to
set up and configure everything, requiring the user only to make choices
among easily-understood menu options.
I'v
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 21:02, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I updated a few servers to ClamAV 70rc1. We only use clamd. OS is
> OpenBSD 3.5.
>
Use 0.70, the current verion.
-tony
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Kristof
> > Petr
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:02 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] upgrading clamav changes permissions on
> > directories?
> >
> > Hello
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:11:41 -0400, Bit Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> clamav-0.67-1
>
>> what does sigtool --list-sigs | grep -i gibe show
> Worm.Gibe.1
>
Well, at least sigtool seems to find correct descriptions.
Version is little bit old, but... Do you scan whole messages or you
B. van Ouwerkerk wrote:
I've seen a message to this list about a GUI to maintain Clamav.
What I'm calling for is not just a GUI to set up and maintain clamav,
but a more comprehensive setup/maintenance utility for the complete
package of MUA (Mozilla by default), fetchmail, sendmail, procmail,
m
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 12:44 am, Tristan Griffiths wrote:
> I've got the same issue. clamd, clamscan and clamdscan all run happily.
> But when you try to run clamav-milter, either by hand or the rc script,
> it fails with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)".
Try the following:
1) Add Foreground a
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 5:53 am, David B. Reyes wrote:
> Good day everyone.
>
> Where does the clamd.sock reside? isn't it created automatically? Am
> using clamav-0.70
1) Where ever you set it in clamav.conf
2) Yes
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK.
Hello.
About my setup: OpenBSD 3.4 stable on i386, Jerome's port from
www.fatbsd.com, ClamAV 0.70, sendmail+clamav-milter+clamd:
> clamd --version
clamd / ClamAV version 0.70
> clamav-milter --version
ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
Two days in a row I have seen several clamav-m
Jon Roland wrote:
If members of this list are serious about getting Linux to displace
Windows, this is critical.
IMHO, I don't think this is what we're discussing in this list.
--
Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office attachments.
See http://www.newsforge.com/software/04/03/27/0134204.shtml
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 10:10 am, Soeren Thing Andersen wrote:
> clamav-milter was started using these parameters:
> > sudo /usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter --local --outgoing --postmaster-only
> > --headers /var/run/clamd/clmilter.sock
I have a theory. To test it please let me know if removing the
At 02:24 22-04-2004 -0500, you wrote:
B. van Ouwerkerk wrote:
I've seen a message to this list about a GUI to maintain Clamav.
What I'm calling for is not just a GUI to set up and maintain clamav, but
a more comprehensive setup/maintenance utility for the complete package of
MUA (Mozilla by defau
On Apr 21, 2004, at 5:04 PM, Tom Walsh wrote:
I know that Tomasz had mentioned that the clamav developers were
working
on the ICAP (i-cap.org) implementation of clamd back in March. I have
not heard anything about the status of this recently and was curious to
see where this is at.
I am really i
I am also new to Fedora, so I use the gui that it offers when I am not
sure what to do. I use gedit for editing text files. Its on the CD's
and easy to use. Just save the original of all files before you make a
change.
Hope this helps.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Stern
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] New User
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:45:53 -0400, "Chalonec Roger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I a
Title: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav.conf file
=> Hi all again,
=>
=> When I run clamdscan, I get the following error:
=>
=> # clamdscan -v
=> ERROR: Clamd is not configured properly.
=>
=> This only happens when I uncomment the line below.
=>
=> # TCP port address.
=> TCPSocket 3310
If
Hello clamav-users,
I'm ClamAV 0.70 (FreeBSD port) + clamav-milter (FreeBSD port) + Sendmail
8.12.8p1/8.12.8
I see in maillog :
Apr 22 11:57:59 ns1 sm-mta[4978]: i3M7vfbD004978: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
size=41927, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200404
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MT
i'm trying to configure clamav 0.70 on RH9 and I get message:
WARNING: GNU MP 2 or newer NOT FOUND - digital signature support will be
disabled !
What mean this?
(I see that I have gmp libraries on default location /usr/lib)
Thanks,
Iulian
--
> That it means? In a result sendmail ceases to accept a mail. How
> to struggle with this problem?
Do you have the --outgoing option enabled for clamav-milter?
> Best regards,
> RShibrick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Conductor, Typeset
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Wiltshire,
Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22,
2004 10:24 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav.conf file
=> Hi all again, =>
=> When I run clamdscan, I get
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Wiltshire,
Michael Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:05 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Cc:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav.conf file
-Original Message-From: Wiltshire,
Michael [mailto
B. van Ouwerkerk wrote:
This goes well beyond the perpose of this list. Would be nice if you
want to use Linux on the desktop. Perhaps you can create a sort of
windows installer look-alike and have it install everything needed. So,
if you have some time left..
Not beyond the purpose of this lis
I'm having a problem where clamscan does not detect an encrypted .zip
file, but clamdscan does. Does anyone have any suggestions?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/bin/clamdscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i bob.zip
/tmp/bob.zip: Encrypted.Zip FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 1
Time:
First - I've searched the archives. Any failure to find information to my
question in the archives is mine alone.
I am attempting to install and v0.70 for use with Sendmail. I am running on
RedHat 9, Athlon.
I've downloaded and compiled source for both clamav and clamav-milter, and I
did enable
On Apr 22, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Jon Roland wrote:
As for Linux and Windows, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer
it be Linux or its descendant.
As for Chevy and Ford, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer it
be Chevy or its descendant.
Doubtful. There will always be diversity in
Don Levey wrote:
However, when trying to start clamav-milter I receive a segmentation fault.
No further information, just that error.
(snip)
In case it helps, I've got the clamav-milter file below.
Thank you for any help you can offer,
-Don
/etc/sysconfig/clamav-milter:
#!/bin/sh
#
# clamav-milt
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 7:48 pm, Don Levey wrote:
> However, when trying to start clamav-milter I receive a segmentation fault.
> No further information, just that error.
Please do the following to help to track this:
1) Enable Debug and Foreground in clamav.conf
2) Start clamav-milter directly f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The startup-scipt nomally resides in, lets say /etc/rc.d/init.d/ on
> Redhat Linux.
>
> Here is how my /etc/sysconfig/clamav-milter looks like: (beware of
> line-wraps)
> CLAMAV_FLAGS="--headers --noreject --outgoing
> --quarantine-dir=/var/run/clamav/quarantine --max-ch
Don Levey wrote:
The lines in sendmail.mc are:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock, F=,
^^
change it to `clmilter'
A.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at Think
Greetings,
Installed on SuSE 9.0 with all services running,
passed a virus through the mail to test, and nothing detected.
I ran freshclam it kicks this:
ClamAV update process started at Thu Apr 22 06:58:14 2004
Reading CVD header (main.cvd): ERROR: Malformed CVD header detected.
ERROR: Can't read
In the message dated: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:01 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from "Don Levey" on
were:
=> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=>
[SNIP!]
=> Yes, it does - thanks!
=> Running that permitted the milter to start without incident or error.
=>
=> Of course now (you just knew there had
Andrzej Migdalski wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
The lines in sendmail.mc are:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav',
`S=local:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock, F=,
^^
change it to `clmilter'
I think what you are trying to say is that this part of the config line
"local:/var/run/clam
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Apr 22, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Jon Roland wrote:
As for Linux and Windows, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer
it be Linux or its descendant.
As for Chevy and Ford, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer it
be Chevy or its descendant.
Operating systems are m
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:35, Don Levey wrote:
> Starting sendmail: 451 4.0.0 InputFilter clmilter not defined: No such file
> or directory
> The lines in sendmail.mc are:
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock, F=,
> T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
> define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTE
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:25:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>In the message dated: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:01 EDT,
>The pithy ruminations from "Don Levey" on
> were:
>=> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>=>
> [SNIP!]
>
>=> Yes, it does - thanks!
>=> Running that permitted the milter to start w
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 12:44 am, Tristan Griffiths wrote:
I've got the same issue. clamd, clamscan and clamdscan all run happily.
But when you try to run clamav-milter, either by hand or the rc script,
it fails with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)".
Try the following
what I meant was changing filter name to be consistent with
"define(confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `clmilter')dnl"
As far as i understand, confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS says which filter(s) to
use and INPUT_MAIL_FILTER define it. Don defined filter named "clamav"
but wanted to use undefined "clmilter".
excu
My sendmail.mc
divert(0)dnl
VERSIONID(`$Id: generic-bsd4.4.mc,v 8.10 1999/02/07 07:26:02 gshapiro Exp $')
OSTYPE(bsd4.4)dnl
DOMAIN(generic)dnl
FEATURE(use_cw_file)
FEATURE(mailertable)
FEATURE(virtusertable)
FEATURE(access_db)
FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)
FEATURE(blacklist_recipients)
FEATURE(`enhdn
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 18:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the message dated: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:01 EDT,
> The pithy ruminations from "Don Levey" on
> were:
>
> RTFEM (Read The Fine Error Message):
>
> => Starting sendmail: 451 4.0.0 InputFilter clmilter not defined: No such file
>
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 20:31, Don Levey wrote:
> Thank you again - this worked. As far as I can tell, it's functioning
> correctly now. Thanks all for your help!
> -Don
>
Oops, I may have spoken too soon. My maillog is showing the following:
Apr 22 20:57:07 davinci sendmail[11572]: i3N0v70t01
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:25:21 -0400, Don Levey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 20:31, Don Levey wrote:
>
>> Thank you again - this worked. As far as I can tell, it's functioning
>> correctly now. Thanks all for your help!
>> -Don
>>
>Oops, I may have spoken too soon. My maill
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 22:20, Steven Stern wrote:
> >Oops, I may have spoken too soon. My maillog is showing the following:
> >
> >Apr 22 20:57:07 davinci sendmail[11572]: i3N0v70t011572: Milter
> >(clmilter): local socket name /var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock unsafe
> >Apr 22 20:57:07 davinci s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm trying to configure clamav 0.70 on RH9 and I get message:
WARNING: GNU MP 2 or newer NOT FOUND - digital signature support will be
disabled !
What mean this?
(I see that I have gmp libraries on default location /usr/lib)
When building from source, you need to ha
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:36:14 -0400, Don Levey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Change the security on /var/run/clamav to clamav:clamav
>>
>> $ ls -ld /var/run/clamav
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 clamav clamav 4096 Apr 19 08:24 /var/run/clamav
>>
>> --
>Steve,
>Unfortunately, that didn't seem to have an effect.
Doubtful. There will always be diversity in computing, and as long as
users don't care one way or the other, Windows will always exist and
probably will hold the desktop for a LNG time. Which is fine.
The user only asks if he/she can do whatever needed on the OS that runs on
the deskt
44 matches
Mail list logo
