Hi
Look at this:
1) clamscan without --unrar
#clamscan --database=/var/clamav/db rarfail.rar
rarfail.rar: RAR module failure.
rarfail.rar: OK
2) clamscan with --unrar
# clamscan --database=/var/clamav/db --unrar=/usr/local/bin/unrar rarf
/usr/home/user/rarfail.rar: RAR module failure.
UNRAR 3.
Thanks for the helps I have received on this mailinglist.
Dexter Ang wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 03:36, Antony Stone wrote:
On Monday 29 March 2004 8:25 pm, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
Hi.
For my MailScanner I use Clamav, that works execellent.
Is it also possible to have Clamav to scan one's hardd
Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote:
2) clamscan with --unrar
# clamscan --database=/var/clamav/db --unrar=/usr/local/bin/unrar rarf
/usr/home/user/rarfail.rar: RAR module failure.
UNRAR 3.30 freeware Copyright (c) 1993-2004 Eugene Roshal
Extracting from /usr/home/user/rarfail.rar
Extracting test1
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 14:24, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Because it's in WinRAR 3 format
> Read the file README on your test directory (under clamav source dir) or
> http://clamav.or.id/snapshot/docs/html/node21.html
>
> "Unrarlib supports RAR 2.0 archives only and according to Christian the
>
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:43:24 +0500
Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And more:
> "Due to security reasons clamd only scans archives supported by libclamav
> and can't use external programs"
what about unrar from freebsd ports? could developers include some code from
unrarsrc-3.x.xm for rar v3
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:05:42PM -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Howdy list,
>
> Is there any way to make clamd log the structure of
> a message and it's attachments? BinHex, MIME, plain-text,
> ZIP, RAR, BZIP, GZIP, OLE2, etc...?
>
> This information would be great for statistics, but I
> coul
Was there a drop in the number of signatures in the database recently?
After what seemed like a slow update, the number of viruses appears to
be only near 20,600...I thought it was at 20,800 range before that
update, but my memory may be playing tricks on me. I updated from two
different compu
The update says:
> Signatures older than two weeks have been moved into main.cvd. This
> update also removes signatures for spam encrypted with JavaScript - we
> decided to leave the spam detection to our professional colleagues from
> anti-spam projects.
Just to be clear, the spam that's not bei
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 3:34 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> Was there a drop in the number of signatures in the database recently?
> After what seemed like a slow update, the number of viruses appears to
> be only near 20,600...I thought it was at 20,800 range before that
> update, but my memory m
Any idea how to fix this? Happens on a make...
ld: table of contents for archive: /usr/lib/libbz2.a is out of date;
rerun ranlib(1) (can't load from it)
make[2]: *** [clamscan] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
--
I noticed that virusdb was updated, according to the clamav-virusdb
list, to daily version 226 but my freshclam is still reporting that 225
is the latest. Am I missing something?
Vernon
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutor
Hi,
I have noticed it on my machine. But I have read somewhere that they clean
the database and remove the duplicates.
Maybe thats why it is smaller now.
P.V.Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "Bart Silverstrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 5:27 pm, P.V.Anthony wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed it on my machine. But I have read somewhere that they clean
> the database and remove the duplicates.
> Maybe thats why it is smaller now.
Removing duplicates was done some time ago - several weeks IIRC.
And, once they
you'll need to do exactly what the error suggests:
% ranlib /usr/lib/libbz2.a
richard
-- On Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:18 AM -0500 Robert Kudyba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any idea how to fix this? Happens on a make...
ld: table of contents for archive: /usr/lib/libbz2.a is out of date; reru
On Mar 30, 2004, at 9:51 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 3:34 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Was there a drop in the number of signatures in the database recently?
After what seemed like a slow update, the number of viruses appears to
be only near 20,600...I thought it was at 20,800
Vernon A. Fort wrote:
I noticed that virusdb was updated, according to the clamav-virusdb
list, to daily version 226 but my freshclam is still reporting that 225
is the latest. Am I missing something?
I seem to be having 227 already. ClamAV is v0.70-rc here.
You're not using a proxy or something
Vernon A. Fort Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:11 AM
> I noticed that virusdb was updated, according to the clamav-virusdb
> list, to daily version 226 but my freshclam is still reporting that 225
> is the latest. Am I missing something?
FYI, my freshclam returns version 227.
cheers,
Colin
Krištof Petr wrote:
Luc de Louw wrote:
[..]
If you are writing some documentation, you _should_ read the another
before.
Your document says:
> I suggest to update the signatures with a hourly cronjob. To edit the
crontab issue *crontab -e* and add the following line:
> 0 * * * * /usr/local
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:00:50 +0300
Korchmenuk Nickolay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:43:24 +0500
> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And more:
> > "Due to security reasons clamd only scans archives supported by
> > libclamav and can't use external programs"
> what abou
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:44:02 -0500 (EST)
jef moskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The update says:
> > Signatures older than two weeks have been moved into main.cvd. This
> > update also removes signatures for spam encrypted with JavaScript -
> > we decided to leave the spam detection to our profe
>
>
>
> Joe Maimon wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Joe Maimon wrote:
> >
> >> I have been having the same as well.
> >>
> >> I added some more verbosity into the syslog statement and got this
> >> logged
> >>
> >> write failure to clamd, nbytes: -1, quarantine_dir: (null), error:
> >> Bad file descriptor
> >>
Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Vernon A. Fort Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:11 AM
I noticed that virusdb was updated, according to the clamav-virusdb
list, to daily version 226 but my freshclam is still reporting that 225
is the latest. Am I missing something?
FYI, my freshclam returns ve
Jaap Scholten wrote:
Joe Maimon wrote:
Joe Maimon wrote:
I have been having the same as well.
I added some more verbosity into the syslog statement and got this
logged
write failure to clamd, nbytes: -1, quarantine_dir: (null), error:
Bad file descriptor
Any ideas?
OK I
Hi
I'm usinf clamav-0.68-1 and occasionally (once every two weeks) I get
this response
ClamAV update process started at Tue Mar 30 08:46:36 2004
SelfCheck: Database status OK.
ERROR: Maximal time (1200 seconds) reached.
Then the freshclam daemon died.
Anyone else come acroos this sort of behavi
Bill Maidment wrote:
Hi
I'm usinf clamav-0.68-1 and occasionally (once every two weeks) I get
this response
ClamAV update process started at Tue Mar 30 08:46:36 2004
SelfCheck: Database status OK.
ERROR: Maximal time (1200 seconds) reached.
Then the freshclam daemon died.
Anyone else come acroo
Joe Maimon wrote:
From the maillog:
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 451 4.7.1 Please try again later
Any ideas, anyone?
(The latest tarball had issues during the make, so I could not get it
installed)
In my case this is directly due to large emails. Also that above
message means that clamd is
Hi,
Bill Maidment wrote:
I'm usinf clamav-0.68-1 and occasionally (once every two weeks) I get
this response
ClamAV update process started at Tue Mar 30 08:46:36 2004
SelfCheck: Database status OK.
ERROR: Maximal time (1200 seconds) reached.
Then the freshclam daemon died.
Anyone else come acr
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:00:50 +0300
> Korchmenuk Nickolay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:43:24 +0500
>> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > And more:
>> > "Due to security reasons clamd only scans archives supported by
>> > libclamav and can't us
I can't seem to find a definate yes or no anywhere, so I figured I'd ask
here.
When using clamd, and freshclam, and new virus list comes out, do I have
to restart or reload clamd to recognize the new definitions or does it
do it automatically?
Hi,
FYI, in the past two days clamav-devel has failed to build on Fedora if
you enable milter.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSENDMAIL_BIN=\"/usr/sbin/sendmail\" -I. -I. -I..
-I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I../clamscan-g -O2 -c `test
-f 'clamav-milter.c' || echo './'`clamav-milter.c
clamav-
bash-2.03# /usr/local/sbin/clamd
ERROR: Parse error at line 71: Unknown option ThreadTimeout.
ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf
bash-2.03# clamd -V
clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040331
Am I missing something?
It works fine on previous builds.
Looking at ChangeLog :
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:11:05PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 08:36, Claudio Alonso wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yesterday I installed clamav-0.70rc-1 from rpm on my RedHat 9.0 (kernel
> > 2.4.20-30.9) and started
> > clamd just to test it's current stability
> > The computer was on al
Another update :
- seems it only happens non-Linux (OSF, Solaris, AIX) build
- Freshclam also behaves incorectly (See change from "signal 14, wake
up" to "signal 14, terminating"). No change on freshclam.conf (Checks 12).
All runing the latest snapshot for that day.
-
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:28, Tim B wrote:
> When using clamd, and freshclam, and new virus list comes out, do I have
> to restart or reload clamd to recognize the new definitions or does it
> do it automatically?
It does it automatically.
--
Russel Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.techsane
I have tons of email attachments being detected as Worm.Somefool.
what is this?
Thanks,
erick.
___
Enviado a traves de
Vision Panama (www.visionpanama.com)
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros cont
Miles Davis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:11:05PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 08:36, Claudio Alonso wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I installed clamav-0.70rc-1 from rpm on my RedHat 9.0 (kernel 2.4.20-30.9) and started
clamd just to test it's current stability
The computer was
russ wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:28, Tim B wrote:
When using clamd, and freshclam, and new virus list comes out, do I have
to restart or reload clamd to recognize the new definitions or does it
do it automatically?
It does it automatically.
Thanks!
whre can i find the libclam library so i can succesfully biul mail::clamav
thanks,
erick.
___
Enviado a
traves de Vision Panama (www.visionpanama.com)
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenid
* russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040331 06:57]: wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:28, Tim B wrote:
>
> > When using clamd, and freshclam, and new virus list comes out, do I have
> > to restart or reload clamd to recognize the new definitions or does it
> > do it automatically?
>
> It does it autom
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040331 06:57]: wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:28, Tim B wrote:
When using clamd, and freshclam, and new virus list comes out, do I have
to restart or reload clamd to recognize the new definitions or does it
do it automatically?
Eperez wrote:
whre can i find the libclam library
By installing clamav :)
I assume you meant libclamav ?
Try rpm packages or http://www.clamav.or.id
Regards,
Fajar
--
Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office attachments.
See http://www.newsforge.com/software/04/03/27/0134204.shtml
here is the output of the compiling process
ideas?
**BEGIN COMPILATION
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailscanner]# perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan shell -- CPAN exploration and modules installation (v1.59_54)
ReadLine support available (try 'install Bundle::CPAN')
cpan> install Mail::ClamAV
CP
* Fajar A. Nugraha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040331 08:36]: wrote:
> Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> >* russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040331 06:57]: wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:28, Tim B wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>When using clamd, and freshclam, and new virus list comes out, do I ha
Eperez wrote:
here is the output of the compiling process
ideas?
[snip]
Starting "perl Makefile.PL" Stage
Note (probably harmless): No library found for -lclamav
error #1 : you must have clamav installed first
ClamAV.xs:11:20: clamav.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [ClamAV.o] Err
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Yes, but it will be slower. Depends on SelfCheck interval (at least this
is true for older versions).
Strangely enough, NotifyClamd is NOT on the default clamav.conf on
latest CVS snapshot (not even "present but commented out" like LogTime).
I guess it's on by default
45 matches
Mail list logo
