Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: is it possble to mark infected e-mail, but still deliver it to addressee ?

2003-11-28 Thread Tommi Rintala
I hope that I didn't understand the original question wrong, but how about installing amavis to work with clamav. It could inform the user that an infected mail message was tried to be delivered, but was stopped (so no actual delivery is done). Therefore the actual delivery is confirmed, but the

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: is it possble to mark infected e-mail, but still deliver it to addressee ?

2003-11-28 Thread Christoph Cordes
Hello Brian, Friday, November 28, 2003, 6:34:40 AM, you wrote: BWA> We do run ClamAV at the ISP level and we've had one user ask that we BWA> not filter their email. My response was to laugh, my boss offered to BWA> mail the user one of the AOL CD's we've got laying around and to cancel BWA>

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: is it possble to mark infected e-mail, but still deliver it to addressee ?

2003-11-28 Thread Thomas Lamy
Christoph Cordes wrote: I hope you don´t laugh too much and think about the problems of filtering mails from time to time: 67.106.13.26 does not like recipient. ... Schicken Sie hat abgelehnt ab. Es war entweder werbe, dumm, oder nur Drgern. Giving up on 67.106.13.26. Can you tell me what Drgern m

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread clamav
At 08:50 PM 11/27/2003, Brian Bruns wrote: Well, I should have put this in the last message. I guess the one I threw together doesn't require anything special (doesn't need daemontools), and only needs bash. I have a habit of writing things very simply to be as small and lightweight as possible :

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: is it possble to mark infected e-mail, but still deliver it to addressee ?

2003-11-28 Thread Brian W. Antoine
At 11:29 PM 11/27/03, you wrote: >Hello Brian, > >I hope you don´t laugh too much and think about the problems of filtering mails from >time to time: > >67.106.13.26 does not like recipient. >... Schicken Sie hat abgelehnt ab. Es war >entweder werbe, dumm, oder nur Drgern. >Giving up on 67.106.13.

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Thomas Lamy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 08:50 PM 11/27/2003, Brian Bruns wrote: Well, I should have put this in the last message. I guess the one I threw together doesn't require anything special (doesn't need daemontools), and only needs bash. I have a habit of writing things very simply to be as small a

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: is it possble to mark infected e-mail, but still deliver it to addressee ?

2003-11-28 Thread Michael Dankov
Hi! On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tommi Rintala wrote: TR>I hope that I didn't understand the original question wrong, but how about TR>installing amavis to work with clamav. It could inform the user that an TR>infected mail message was tried to be delivered, but was stopped (so no TR>actual delivery is d

[Clamav-users] clamd descriptors leakage?

2003-11-28 Thread Jakub Jankowski
Hi. I'm using clamd/clamav-milter from clamav-devel-latest with sendmail 8.12 on a linux/2.2. Unfortunately, I can't tell when this bug was introduced. At the moment, I'm on clamav-devel-20031125 with clamav-milter patched *a bit* [just to make its 'virus intercepted' emails more useful for our us

Re: [Clamav-users] Oversized Zip, again ...

2003-11-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:11:35 +0900 Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I am going to try this, but could you explain to the list what is > the point of this parameter ? if (original_size / compressed_size >= ZIPOSDET) return Oversized.Zip Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > daemontools isn't "special", whatever that means, and bash shells are 'sepcial' is in a default installation. As in there is nothing called daemontools on my Solaris 8 server. There is however both sh and bash. =

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Eduardo Kaftanski
where can I get the daemon tools baeed one t test it please? -- Eduardo Kaftanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat Certified Engineer/Instructor/Examiner Gerente Ingenieria LinuxCenter S.A. Canada 239 5to Piso, Providencia, Stgo de Chile. http://www.linuxcenter.cl 2745000

RE: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Lynn Duerksen
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd > > > At 08:50 PM 11/27/2003, Brian Bruns wrote: > >Well, I should have put this in the last message. > > > >I guess the one I threw together doesn't require anything special > >(doesn't need daemontools), and only needs bash. I have

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam 0.65 and Dazuko

2003-11-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 19:29:16 -0500 "Rick Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And still when clamd initializes it turns on dazuko. Any thoughts? Make sure you edit the right config file. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ClamAV.net (\/)\

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Lynn Duerksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031128 18:58]: wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd > > > > > > At 08:50 PM 11/27/2003, Brian Bruns wrote: > > >Well, I should have put this in the last message. > > > &g

RE: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Lynn Duerksen
> > echo $TIMESTAMP " restarting freshclam daemon" > > /usr/local/bin/freshclam -d -c 4 > > --datadir=/var/amavisd/usr/local/share/clamav --log-verbose > > fi > > > > > > FYI - Since installing 0.65 this has recorded no restarts > > Well, but why run freshclam all the time? > I suppose

Re: [Clamav-users] Oversized Zip, again ...

2003-11-28 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 23:54:14 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:03:06 +0900 > Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can someone explain me about the libclamav/scanners.c and this value > > at the line 64 ? Should I increase it again ? > > Please set it to 70 - we

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread clamav
At 06:03 AM 11/28/2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > daemontools isn't "special", whatever that means, and bash shells are 'sepcial' is in a default installation. As in there is nothing called daemontools on my Solaris 8 server. There is however bo

Re: [Clamav-users] Autochecking script for clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > bash is not a part of the default solaris 8 server installation. neither is > clamav, for that matter. This is quickly getting off topic -- however a number of gnu type utils were included in Solarius 8, and I am fairly sure /bin/bash was one of them

[Clamav-users] Process based clamd

2003-11-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
The current CVS code contains a new directive: UseProcesses that will cause clamd to use processes instead of threads. Initial version but seems to work ;) It should be really useful for clamav-milter users. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ClamAV

Re: [Clamav-users] Oversized Zip, again ...

2003-11-28 Thread Chris Paul
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:24:02 +0100 Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have also seen stopped .doc files compressed with ratio 236. > And .dbf files with ratio 1101. Also, .wav files with ratio 1182. > > Users send quite strange things. So an admin may be forced to set > ZIPOSDET for s