Hi,
Looks like the above worm is making it's way around and we have
received a few copies already. Any idea when the virus db will be updated to
detect this?
Thanks,
John Birkhead
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:24, John Birkhead wrote:
> Hi,
> Looks like the above worm is making it's way around and we have
> received a few copies already. Any idea when the virus db will be updated to
> detect this?
It was released on Friday - it's listed as Trojan.Dropper.C
I've picked up a
I thought they updated late last week, our versions of the DB catch it as:
Report: message.zip contains Trojan.Dropper.C
And we have caught about 30 since late last night using ClamAV. Is there
another version its not catching yet?
Uh oh...
JPP
At 07:24 AM 8/4/03 -0700, you wrote:
Hi,
L
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 at 7:24:02 -0700, John Birkhead wrote:
> Hi,
> Looks like the above worm is making it's way around and we have
> received a few copies already. Any idea when the virus db will be updated to
> detect this?
>
> Thanks,
> John Birkhead
Are you sure that these copies were
Thanks for the clarification!
I'm a ClamAV newbie and I'm not sure how to map virus names across different
vendors. :-)
Mm. I have seen this virus reported being received in the last several
days by our mail gateway but I didn't know that this was [EMAIL PROTECTED] (as
named by Symantec).
Th
I noticed it was added to the database on Aug 1st at 13:20 (see link below). I'm
running clamav-20030320 and it's filtering out that virus ok.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=2886216&forum_id=34654
Brett
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/03 10:24AM >>>
Hi,
Looks like th
Hi,
I cron a Freshclam every hour and my log reports that the update you
mention was executed. I am also seeing occasional reports of the
Trojan.Dropper.C virus being detected.
I will investigate the Symantec report I received from our Exchange server
and see if I can work out a timeline.
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 at 7:46:36 -0700, John Birkhead wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification!
>
> I'm a ClamAV newbie and I'm not sure how to map virus names across different
> vendors. :-)
Probably nobody is sure ;-) . As far as I can see, vendors sometimes
invent completely different names for vi
John Birkhead wrote:
> Hi,
> Looks like the above worm is making it's way around and we have
> received a few copies already. Any idea when the virus db will be
> updated to detect this?
I'm finding that it is already being detected as Trojan.Dropper.C
BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 08:39:30 -0600
Support ePaxsys/FRWS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought they updated late last week, our versions of the DB catch it as:
> Report: message.zip contains Trojan.Dropper.C
>
> And we have caught about 30 since late last night using ClamAV. Is there
> another v
Sorry if I mislead - but we are using the latest and greatest Clam
AntiVirus 'system' version 0.60 with MailScanner and sendmail.
I 'assume' that this is up-to-date and working fine. It is catching that
virus just fine.
JPP
At 05:16 PM 8/4/03 +0200, you wrote:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 08:39:30 -060
I have a mail server running qmail 1.03. I also use qmail-scanner and SA
with clamav. I noticed that I have not seen any copies of warnings of
virus packed e-mails. So a quick check od syslog has :
Aug 4 09:25:34 webmail spamc[1810]: connection attempt to spamd aborted
after 3 retries
Aug 4 09:2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
obviously, for some reason your spamd is not running, try to start it
up in the foreground, and see if it gives you any error messages.
PJ
> I have a mail server running qmail 1.03. I also use qmail-scanner
> and SA with clamav. I noticed that I have
Hi,
Just downloaded v0.60, already running 0.24. I run ClamAV on a lower
spec. machine which has no GCC on it, so I compile on another machine.
I've done this in the past where I compile on one machine, copy over to
the other and then do a make install without issue. However, can't get
this to w
Hi,
Just downloaded v0.60, already running 0.24. I run ClamAV on a lower
spec. machine which has no GCC on it, so I compile on another machine.
I've done this in the past where I compile on one machine, copy over to
the other and then do a make install without issue. However, can't get
this to w
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just downloaded v0.60, already running 0.24. I run ClamAV on a lower
> spec. machine which has no GCC on it, so I compile on another machine.
> I've done this in the past where I compile on one machine, copy over to
> the other and then do a make install
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 19:40:13 +0100
Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just downloaded v0.60, already running 0.24. I run ClamAV on a lower
Please do not use 0.24.
> spec. machine which has no GCC on it, so I compile on another machine.
I wonder how it is possible to run 0.24 with an ol
OK, so it doesn't run that fast on the machine, but it's only checking
incoming mail so it has as long as it takes...
There is no problem with the ./configure on the build machine. The
build runs fine on the i686 machine, the problem is trying to do a 'make
install' on the i586 machine :-
[EM
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:19:26 +0100
Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so it doesn't run that fast on the machine, but it's only checking
> incoming mail so it has as long as it takes...
>
> There is no problem with the ./configure on the build machine. The
> build runs fine on the i686 mach
Em Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:46:08 +0200, Luca Gibelli escreveu:
> You can still reach clamav website through http://www.clamav.net,
> http://clamav.elektrapro.com and http://www.clamav.com.
The Support link is broken...
--
_ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 648 11 34
/
20 matches
Mail list logo
