Am 02.02.2017 um 15:04 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2017-02-02 14:36:
that maybe would fine if clamav would have the best hitrate, but by
far it don't
tell this maillist here where there is on that is better on memory usage
and still gpl'ed, that would be much more truly
Reindl Harald skrev den 2017-02-02 14:36:
that maybe would fine if clamav would have the best hitrate, but by far
it don't
tell this maillist here where there is on that is better on memory usage
and still gpl'ed, that would be much more truly to read about then just
that clamav is bad, with
Am 02.02.2017 um 14:31 schrieb Groach:
the much better question is *why* is clamav that much memory wasting >
especially 385 MB for the official rules which barely hit anything and >
are removed here entirely from production machines for some weeks after
hit nothing over the last 3 months -
the much better question is *why* is clamav that much memory wasting
especially 385 MB for the official rules which barely hit anything and
are removed here entirely from production machines for some weeks after
hit nothing over the last 3 months - any catches was done by
sanesecurity alone
t
Francis Stevens wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>> I've misplaced the original post I made so I can't reply to it,
>> however I'd like to make a note for the archives what the problem is
>> and to thank Steve Basford and Edwin for the their help in finding
>> it. Seems like I had both a main.cvd and main.cld
Chris wrote:
I've misplaced the original post I made so I can't reply to it, however
I'd like to make a note for the archives what the problem is and to
thank Steve Basford and Edwin for the their help in finding it. Seems
like I had both a main.cvd and main.cld. I removed the main.cld file and
a
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:27 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:56 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >> Chris wrote:
> >>> I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an
> >>> app is
> >>> supposed to use but it seems t
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:27 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:56 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >> Chris wrote:
> >>> I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an
> >>> app is
> >>> supposed to use but it seems t
On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Chris wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:56 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Chris wrote:
I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an
app is
supposed to use but it seems to me that since I installed .96 on my
Mandriva 2010 system it's using an excessi
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:56 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an app is
> > supposed to use but it seems to me that since I installed .96 on my
> > Mandriva 2010 system it's using an excessive amount.
> >
> >
> > PID USER
Jim Preston wrote:
Chris wrote:
I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an app is
supposed to use but it seems to me that since I installed .96 on my
Mandriva 2010 system it's using an excessive amount.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
Chris wrote:
I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an app is
supposed to use but it seems to me that since I installed .96 on my
Mandriva 2010 system it's using an excessive amount.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
834 clamav 20
12 matches
Mail list logo
