Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Sorry for being off-topic (and risking to feed a troll):
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 22:36 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
That's what my license says - and I paid for it. IP theft is
Sorry for being off-topic (and risking to feed a troll):
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 22:36 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> >> That's what my license says - and I paid for it. IP theft is never
On 3/28/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
> >> Like Andy and the citrus site says:
> >>
> >> "The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC
> >> 64-bit."
> >>
> >> So, don't install those on S
At 10:54 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
I shouldn't waste my time with a moron - so I won't except to say
that my usage of the word "you" that has your panties in a bunch is
a collective term having nothing at all to do with you personally.
It can be replaced with "one" as in "one must purchase a lic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:36 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The f
At 10:36 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9
SPARC
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages
of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC 64-bit."
So, don't inst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC
64-bit."
So, don't install those on Solaris 10.
solaris 9 b
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC 64-bit."
So, don't install those on Solaris 10.
solaris 9 binaries will run just fine o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC
64-bit."
So, don't install those on Solaris 10.
solaris 9 binaries will run just fine on solaris 10. i have binaries
g
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC 64-bit."
So, don't install those on Solaris 10.
solaris 9 binaries will run just fine on solaris
10. i have binaries going back to solaris 2.5.1 t
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, René Berber wrote:
; To the OP, the SUNWzlib package includes the 64-bit libraries, just do a
"pkgchk
; - -v SUNWzlib" and see for yourself. I don't know what the dependency on the
; clamav package you were originally installing is for, an obsolete dependency
; perhaps? ...
13 matches
Mail list logo
