At 10:36 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:20 PM 3/27/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
Like Andy and the citrus site says:
"The following binary packages
of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC 64-bit."
So, don't install those on Solaris 10.
solaris 9 binaries will run just fine on
solaris 10. i have binaries going back to
solaris 2.5.1 that run fine on solaris 10.
backwards compatibility has always existed on the sparc architectures.
You have to pay for Solaris 9.
false, and irrelevant anyway.
That's what my license says - and I paid for
it. IP theft is never irrelevant.
not all the licenses for solaris 9 are the
same. do your research first before you suggest
I or anyone else is engaging in IP theft.
I'm using Sol 9 commercially. I'm not a student.
I'm not exploring it for possible inclusion in
my world. I'm using it in a business. Therefore
I have to pay for it and I did. It's the law. If
I had not I would be engaging in IP theft. I
didn't say you were engaging in IP theft. There
is no way I can determine that. What you
understood in what I said is your responsibility - even if it is wrong.
you blew it, and revealed yourself to be a troll.
you originally wrote, and you can see it above:
"YOU have to pay for solaris 9" (emphasis mine).
you did not say "I had to pay for solaris 9". but
now you're putting on the halo, pretending you
weren't suggesting anything about anybody else.
troll behavior. gotta love it. and this all has
what to do with clamav? oh, right. nothing.
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://www.smileglobal.com
http://www.forumgarden.com
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
