Tomasz,
Thanks for the suggestions, I'd used a similar approach to get it all
working, but was more concerned as to why the original approach failed.
I use this with many other packages without problem, and wondered
wether there was actually a problem/error somewhere within the Makefiles
that
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 00:15:26 +0200
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:19:26 +0100
> Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, so it doesn't run that fast on the machine, but it's only checking
> > incoming mail so it has as long as it takes...
> >
> > There is no pro
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:19:26 +0100
Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so it doesn't run that fast on the machine, but it's only checking
> incoming mail so it has as long as it takes...
>
> There is no problem with the ./configure on the build machine. The
> build runs fine on the i686 mach
OK, so it doesn't run that fast on the machine, but it's only checking
incoming mail so it has as long as it takes...
There is no problem with the ./configure on the build machine. The
build runs fine on the i686 machine, the problem is trying to do a 'make
install' on the i586 machine :-
[EM
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 19:40:13 +0100
Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just downloaded v0.60, already running 0.24. I run ClamAV on a lower
Please do not use 0.24.
> spec. machine which has no GCC on it, so I compile on another machine.
I wonder how it is possible to run 0.24 with an ol
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just downloaded v0.60, already running 0.24. I run ClamAV on a lower
> spec. machine which has no GCC on it, so I compile on another machine.
> I've done this in the past where I compile on one machine, copy over to
> the other and then do a make install
