Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

I know this thread should be stopped, but I must state my gratitude towards developers of ClamAV. On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Antony Stone wrote: > > bottom line, clamav is STILL a < 1.0 release. if you're going to use it in > > a production environment, AND want all the latest/greatest features then D

Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, OpenMacNews wrote: > in my experience and opinion, this list -- and the great team and > product behind it -- is one of the most active/responsive opensource > products that i've seen While I heartily agree, and recommend ClamAV to anyone within earshot when the subject comes

Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:53:48AM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote: [...] > just one man's opinion. you are not alone - heartily seconded! -- --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Inte

Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:15 am, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > [snip] > > Let me add my agreement as well. The Clamav team is doing a fantastic job! > > An earlier message that I posted may have communicated my frustration with > clamav-milter, which we've had a great deal of trouble with. Ju

RE: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

OpenMacNews wrote: > i'm noticing a lot of displeasure with "0.65 not doing this, that or > the other ..." > > in my experience and opinion, this list -- and the great team and > product behind it -- is one of the most active/responsive opensource > products that i've s

Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

I concur..  We run Norton on the desktops and clamav on our mail servers. It is usually a toss up which one updates the signature list for a new virus first.. The activity on this list is so good, I usually inform others what new virus is out before Norton, etc..  lets them know... Great list

Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

On Tuesday 10 February 2004 4:53 pm, OpenMacNews wrote: > in my experience and opinion, this list -- and the great team and product > behind it -- is one of the most active/responsive opensource products that > i've seen I agree. > bottom line, clamav is STILL a < 1.0 release. if you're going t