> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Maimon
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan
>
>
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 14:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > What DOES read clamav.conf?
>
> clamd, clamdscan, and clamav-milter. freshclam also looks at it to find
> out how to notify clamd if you have it set to notify clamd after updates.
> It _is_ in the various docs, you know :)
The RPM I'm using ha
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:20:03 +1000
Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is that if we could make the names of the processes more
> distinguishable and match the conf files (if any) then we remove the
> chance of error. For example clamscan could be renamed to scanclam
> (with NO s
Jim Maul wrote:
Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont
seem to realize this.
Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion!
Perhaps, but this is not my decision.
/etc/clamav.conf -> /etc/clamd.conf ?
The whole purpose of clamscan is
> >
>
> Exactly. I never said clamscan should use clamav.conf. I simply stated
> that since clamd/clamdscan (and optionally freshclam as well) are the only
> programs to use clamav.conf, perhaps it would avoid some confusion if it
> were to be called clamd.conf.
>
> Jim
Hello again,
My prev
Jim Maul wrote:
Exactly. I never said clamscan should use clamav.conf. I simply stated
that since clamd/clamdscan (and optionally freshclam as well) are the only
programs to use clamav.conf,
clamav-milter references it as well.
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan
>
>
>
>
> > > > >Bec
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Ewart
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan
>
>
> On Tuesday, 27.04.2004 at
> > > >Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont
> > > >seem to realize this.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion!
> >
> > Perhaps, but this is not my decision.
>
> /etc/clamav.conf -> /etc/clamd.conf ?
>
The whole purpose of clamscan is to be a comma
On Tuesday, 27.04.2004 at 09:38 -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> > >Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont
> > >seem to realize this.
> >
> > Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion!
>
> Perhaps, but this is not my decision.
/etc/clamav.conf -> /etc/clamd.conf ?
Dave.
--
Da
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
> Maidment
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan
>
>
> Jim Maul wrote:
&g
Jim Maul wrote:
Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont seem to
realize this.
Jim
Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion!
Bill
> On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
>> use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip
>
> Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files
> is not working?
>
Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont seem to
reali
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 12:23:31PM -0500, Eric Wieling said:
> On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:47, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Eric Wieling said:
> > > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypte
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:47, Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Eric Wieling said:
> > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip
> >
> > Any idea why the config file setting to enable blo
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Eric Wieling said:
> On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip
>
> Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files
> is not working?
Because clamscan d
Eric Wieling wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip
Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files
is not working?
I may be wrong in my thinking but clamdscan and clamscan are not real
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
> use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip
Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files
is not working?
--Eric
--
Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
"In a related st
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:00:43PM -0500, Eric Wieling said:
> I'm having a problem where clamscan does not detect an encrypted .zip
> file, but clamdscan does. Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/bin/clamdscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i bob.zip
> /tmp/bob.zip: Encrypted.
19 matches
Mail list logo
