On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 at 7:22:35 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> >You can setup your own (internal) database mirror. Freshclam connects to
> >the httpd (80) port of DatabaseMirror, so you only need to download
> >databases into a root directory of your www server (freshclam
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:36:30 +0100 (BST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we currently have four servers checking every hour. With a cache,
just one update (through both our and clamav's valuable banmdwidth)
You can setup your own (internal) database mirror. Freshclam connects to
th
> How do I (as admin) stop internal clients going outside for updates and
> force them to use my cache. (Once I set it up).
You need a transparent proxy in-line on your network connection (eg just
in front of your firewall or router).
G
---
SF
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 16:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> so in addition to our servers, there are some 50 client machines all
> querying the clamav databases, probably every hour most likely more often
> if I know M$ lovers.
>
> Making all users aware of the proxy cache will now mean we will only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is this in the manual/docs ? if so then IAP
I realised after my post that nearly all our clients are using win32
clamav
so in addition to our servers, there are some 50 client machines all
querying the clamav databases, probably every hour most like
> What about a freshclam cache.
>
> Many users probably have several if not many servers all running clamav.
> If we had a freshcached daemon running on a secure server we could point
> all other servers to that cache.
Why not use squid and point httpproxy in freshclam.conf to there?
> Jim :-)
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:36:30AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> What about a freshclam cache.
[snip]
> Do it the unix way -> "split the problem into separate processes that do
> their job and only their job the best way possible".
squid, anyone?
--
--
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> Does the clamd process need to be signaled on each machine to recognize the
> new db?
Yes. Here are the pieces - there are probably simpler ways to do most of
this now.
The cron job:
/usr/local/bin/freshclam --daemon-notify --log=/var/adm/clam-updat
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> > run freschclam on one machine, use on-update-execute to run an rsync
> > script after a successfull download to update all your other
> > machines.
>
> Does the clamd process need to be signaled on each machine to recognize the
> new db?
Yes, but you
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> What about a freshclam cache.
>
> Many users probably have several if not many servers all running clamav.
> If we had a freshcached daemon running on a secure server we could point
> al
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:38:17 -0700 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Mitch \(WebCob\)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the clamd process need to be signaled on each machine to
> recognize the new db?
Yes.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.ne
>
> run freschclam on one machine, use on-update-execute to run an
> rsync script
> after a successfull download to update all your other machines.
>
>
> ==
> Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does the clamd process need to be signaled on
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Many users probably have several if not many servers all running clamav.
> If we had a freshcached daemon running on a secure server we could point
> all other servers to that cache. Or better yet have that daemon notify a
run freschclam on one machi
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:36:30 +0100 (BST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If we currently have four servers checking every hour. With a cache,
> just one update (through both our and clamav's valuable banmdwidth)
You can setup your own (internal) database mirror. Freshclam connects to
the httpd (80) po
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 22:48, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Ok, so we can't do that, but can you suggest a better method than
> running freshclam every hour? I would think that the clamav development
> team would be interested in doing a "push" to sites that wanted them,
> because these are probably the s
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 at 11:36:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What about a freshclam cache.
>
> Many users probably have several if not many servers all running clamav.
> If we had a freshcached daemon running on a secure server we could point
> all other servers to that cache. Or better ye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about a freshclam cache.
Many users probably have several if not many servers all running clamav.
If we had a freshcached daemon running on a secure server we could point
all other servers to that cache. Or better yet have that daemon notify a
l
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 at 16:48:44 -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Ok, so we can't do that, but can you suggest a better method than
> running freshclam every hour? I would think that the clamav development
> team would be interested in doing a "push" to sites that wanted them,
> because these are prob
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 at 21:55:16 +0200, Niek wrote:
>
> I don't know what your return times of the sourceforge mailing lists are.
> But over here, it can take up to 1.5, 2hours during USA daytime.
Indeed.
We are planning to move MLs to a new server in September.
--
Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP
Ok, so we can't do that, but can you suggest a better method than
running freshclam every hour? I would think that the clamav development
team would be interested in doing a "push" to sites that wanted them,
because these are probably the same sites that update on an hourly basis
right now.
Rega
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 19:53, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Why not just do what I've been working on. Just set up a procmail rule
> that runs freshclam whenever you get a message from the clamav-virusdb
> list. It should work just as good as the clamav team sending you a
> virusdb "push" every time the
:0
* ^X-BeenThere:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| nice -n 5 /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet
This one should work...not certain, but that's as far as I've gotten so
far...
Regards,
Mike
--- Begin Message ---
At 18:53 16/08/2004, Mike Robinson wrote:
Why not just do what I've been working on. Just set up a
On 8/16/2004 7:53 PM GMT+2, Mike Robinson wrote:
Why not just do what I've been working on. Just set up a procmail rule
that runs freshclam whenever you get a message from the clamav-virusdb
list. It should work just as good as the clamav team sending you a
virusdb "push" every time the database
At 18:53 16/08/2004, Mike Robinson wrote:
Why not just do what I've been working on. Just set up a procmail rule
that runs freshclam whenever you get a message from the clamav-virusdb
list. It should work just as good as the clamav team sending you a
virusdb "push" every time the database is upda
Why not just do what I've been working on. Just set up a procmail rule
that runs freshclam whenever you get a message from the clamav-virusdb
list. It should work just as good as the clamav team sending you a
virusdb "push" every time the database is updated.
Regards,
Mike
Mike Robinson, UNIX A
> No, the cron job only runs on the hour (minute == 0) so it will only run
> once per hour at a random time between hh:00 and hh:30.
>
> A.
>
D'oh! Note to self - don't think you are smart when you're tired! Thanks.
---
SF.Net email is sponso
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
; > > Please always try to _avoid_ to have cron based internet
; > services run by the
; > > hour. Please consider another value than 0. What about 17 or 41
; > as the value
; > > for the minute?
; >
; > As per discussions on this list on awhile ago; I u
> > Please always try to _avoid_ to have cron based internet
> services run by the
> > hour. Please consider another value than 0. What about 17 or 41
> as the value
> > for the minute?
>
> As per discussions on this list on awhile ago; I use the following for
> my crontab entry
> 0 * * * * sleep
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 07:43:21AM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
>
> Please always try to _avoid_ to have cron based internet services run by the
> hour. Please consider another value than 0. What about 17 or 41 as the value
> for the minute?
As per discussions on this list on awhile ago; I use t
Am Saturday 14 August 2004 02:56 schrieb Julio Galicia:
Hi,
> 0 */4 * * * root /usr/local/bin/freshclam 2>/tmp/freshclam.txt; cat \
> /tmp/freshclam.txt | mail -s "Actualizacion Antivirus" jgalicia
Please always try to _avoid_ to have cron based internet services run by the
hour. Please conside
El jue, 12-08-2004 a las 18:46, Philip Ershler escribió:
> What do folks think is an appropriate interval for a cron job to run
> freshclam? Is once an hour reasonable?
>
> Thanks,
> Phil
>
This is my line in /etc/crontab:
0 */4 * * * root /usr/local/bin/freshclam 2>/tmp/freshclam.txt; cat \
/t
31 matches
Mail list logo
