Still working out the final kinks and learning a lot about Ubuntu. I've
got SA and ClamAV integrated now thanks to Anthony Dickinson on the
list. However, I noticed this in my hourly syslog snippet:
Jul 22 13:34:07 localhost spamd[18732]: spamd: processing message
<1406053942.31541.26.camel@local
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Craig Green wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
I've been having this problem for quite some time and thought it might go
away after upgrading all our spamd/clamd boxes to FreeBSD 6.2 from 4.11.
It hasn't though... We use a maildrop recipe that uses the
clamd-strea
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
I've been having this problem for quite some time and thought it might
go away after upgrading all our spamd/clamd boxes to FreeBSD 6.2 from
4.11.
It hasn't though... We use a maildrop recipe that uses the
clamd-stream-client to send messages over to a clu
Hi all,
I've been having this problem for quite some time and thought it might go away
after upgrading all our spamd/clamd boxes to FreeBSD 6.2 from 4.11.
It hasn't though... We use a maildrop recipe that uses the clamd-stream-client
to send messages over to a cluster of spam/virus filtering
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 3:37, Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I get this error, and i googled but found nought but source code.
> >
> > What is the meaning of this error ?
>
> man clamd.conf
>
> There are several limits that have to be configured according your
> needs. These limits are i
>
> Hi,
>
> I get this error, and i googled but found nought but source code.
>
> What is the meaning of this error ?
>
>
man clamd.conf
There are several limits that have to be configured according your needs.
These limits are imposed to avoid scanning files that can overload your
clamd server.
Hi,
I get this error, and i googled but found nought but source code.
What is the meaning of this error ?
Cheers,
ace
--
Onderteken de Europese petitie tegen kernenergie:
http://www.atomstopp.com/1million/petition.asp?c=nl
Ace Suares' Internet Consultancy
mail: PObox 2599, 4800 CN Breda, Th
> Just finished my coffee. It is not perl, but the OS itself.
>
> Just doing: "nc -vvv -l -p 61000" gives "address already in use",
> and that up to port 65234. But there is no process really using it.
> I think that range was used by the NAT-module in ipchains.
>
> That machine was planned to
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Trog wrote:
I guess it's a bug in the perl script you two are using, it doesn't
handle high port numbers correctly.
That could well be the case, because that system runs perl 5.6.1 (why
upgrade production systems when all works fine).
A quick check shows 65235 as highest used p
Trog wrote:
I guess it's a bug in the perl script you two are using, it doesn't
handle high port numbers correctly.
That could well be the case, because that system runs perl 5.6.1 (why
upgrade production systems when all works fine).
A quick check shows 65235 as highest used portnumber (with succe
I guess it's a bug in the perl script you two are using, it doesn't
handle high port numbers correctly.
-trog
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 13:25 -0800, exo dia wrote:
> Thank you Paul, I just made these changes to my clamd.conf, and
> restarted clamd. Hopefully this will correct (work around?) the
>
Thank you Paul, I just made these changes to my clamd.conf, and
restarted clamd. Hopefully this will correct (work around?) the
problem! What do these settings mean (I haven't dug that far into the
source yet)?
-ed
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:17:26 +0100, Paul Bijnens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ex
exo dia wrote:
I am piping e-mail via procmail, I pipe the e-mail to clamdscan
through a shell script (no milter or anything being used.) This is
the original version of the script I am using:
http://www.everysoft.com/clamfilter.pl.txt
I noticed the same, using a similar perlscript via procmail.
I
I am piping e-mail via procmail, I pipe the e-mail to clamdscan
through a shell script (no milter or anything being used.) This is
the original version of the script I am using:
http://www.everysoft.com/clamfilter.pl.txt
Thank you!
-ed
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:53:17 +, Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize -- bad cut and paste in my first e-mail subject. This is
the error from my logs:
Thu Jan 27 11:28:12 2005 -> SelfCheck: Database status OK.
Thu Jan 27 11:50:15 2005 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed.
Thu Jan 27 11:57:43 2005 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed.
Thu Jan 2
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 11:44 -0800, exo dia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The latest 0.81 release of clamav now displays "ERROR: ScanStream:
> accept() failed." errors in the logs for some incoming e-mails. For
> example if I send the "Test #6: Eicar virus embedded within another
> MIME segment" test from ht
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 11:44 -0800, exo dia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The latest 0.81 release of clamav now displays "ERROR: ScanStream:
> accept() failed." errors in the logs for some incoming e-mails. For
> example if I send the "Test #6: Eicar virus embedded within another
> MIME segment" test from ht
Hello,
The latest 0.81 release of clamav now displays "ERROR: ScanStream:
accept() failed." errors in the logs for some incoming e-mails. For
example if I send the "Test #6: Eicar virus embedded within another
MIME segment" test from http://www.webmail.us/testvirus it causes this
error, where with
Hello,
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Wednesday 02 Jun 2004 12:57, George Chelidze wrote:
CLAMAV_FLAGS="-c /etc/clamav.conf -nlPH local:/ctl/clamav-milter.ctl"
That's the place - now do 'man clamav-milter' and look under the 'd' option and you'll
have your answer on whether the messages are failed or pass
On Wednesday 02 Jun 2004 12:57, George Chelidze wrote:
> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-c /etc/clamav.conf -nlPH local:/ctl/clamav-milter.ctl"
That's the place - now do 'man clamav-milter' and look under the 'd' option and you'll
have your answer on whether the messages are failed or passed through unscanned.
-
Hello,
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Wednesday 02 Jun 2004 06:38, George Chelidze wrote:
Also I wonder what happens to message which triggers the following warning:
WARNING: ScanStream: Size limit reached ( max: 10485760)
Is it bounced back or pass through without scanning?
That depends on the options yo
On Wednesday 02 Jun 2004 06:38, George Chelidze wrote:
> Also I wonder what happens to message which triggers the following warning:
>
> WARNING: ScanStream: Size limit reached ( max: 10485760)
>
> Is it bounced back or pass through without scanning?
That depends on the options you give to clam
Hello,
I am using clamav 0.71 on RH 7.3 2.4.24 and it works fine. No major
problems. I have found several messages in clamd.log like this:
ERROR: ScanStream: accept timeout.
What does this message mean?
Also I wonder what happens to message which triggers the following warning:
WARNING: ScanStrea
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Alex S Moore wrote:
> Are you using GNU compiler and make? I found that my problems started with
> clamav code changes somewhere this month. I have been using Sun's compiler
I'm using Gnu compiler but Solaris make
I've installed version 0.70 rc . No problems up to now
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Bugs wrote:
>
> I saw the same thing after I downloaded the new binaries for
> our Tru64 server.
>
> I did some testing and found that when I used the previous
> clamdscan binary, everything worked again. It even picks up
> viruses that were missed before, and caught by our "b
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> was your /tmp full ?
Sorry, my fault -but I've rebooted first, and
started thinking next :-) But no messages
about /tmp full in syslogs.
Krzysztof Snopek
---
This SF.Net email
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:51:44 +0100 (CET)
Krzysztof Snopek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The log above is complete, nothing has been cut. There were no mail
> except for those timeouts, and when after 3 h from database reloading
> new mail arrived, it went wrong way.
Are you using GNU compiler and
I saw the same thing after I downloaded the new binaries for
our Tru64 server.
I did some testing and found that when I used the previous
clamdscan binary, everything worked again. It even picks up
viruses that were missed before, and caught by our "banned
extensions" recipe.
So I am using all th
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Alex S Moore wrote:
> After going back further in clamd.log, I am seeing exactly the same thing
> on Solaris 9 sparc, sendmail 8.12.11 + milter. It started yesterday
> morning and I had to shut down clamav.
>
> I ran a find for anything changed in the past 2 days, but found n
Krzysztof Snopek wrote:
Tue Mar 16 04:01:00 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed.
Tue Mar 16 04:02:27 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: Can't create temporary
file.
[snip]
Could someone guess what happened?
was your /tmp full ?
By default, Solaris stores /tmp on system memory (and swap) as
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:29:57 +0100 (CET)
Krzysztof Snopek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After weeks of running clamd+clamav-milter without any problems
> (Solaris9 sparc, sendmail 8.12.10), today morning something wrong
> happened. Below are some lines from clamd.log :
>
> Tue Mar 16 03:57:46 2004
Sorry, I forgot to add:
clamav version 0.67-1
Krzysztof Snopek
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everyt
After weeks of running clamd+clamav-milter without any problems
(Solaris9 sparc, sendmail 8.12.10), today morning something wrong
happened. Below are some lines from clamd.log :
Tue Mar 16 03:57:46 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed.
Tue Mar 16 03:57:47 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept()
33 matches
Mail list logo
