On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Alex S Moore wrote:

> After going back further in clamd.log, I am seeing exactly the same thing
> on Solaris 9 sparc, sendmail 8.12.11 + milter.  It started yesterday
> morning and I had to shut down clamav.
>
> I ran a find for anything changed in the past 2 days, but found nothing of
> significance.  Could a clam database change have caused this?  The database
> was reloaded about 2 hours earlier.  My message volume is fairly low and it

Looks like possible cause... looking in my log:

Tue Mar 16 01:00:28 2004 -> Reading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav
Tue Mar 16 01:00:30 2004 -> Database correctly reloaded (20482 viruses)
Tue Mar 16 01:18:38 2004 -> Session 0 stopped due to timeout.
Tue Mar 16 01:46:22 2004 -> Session 1 stopped due to timeout.
Tue Mar 16 02:00:57 2004 -> SelfCheck: Database status OK.
Tue Mar 16 02:13:24 2004 -> Session 1 stopped due to timeout.
Tue Mar 16 02:41:16 2004 -> Session 0 stopped due to timeout.
Tue Mar 16 03:01:25 2004 -> SelfCheck: Database status OK.
Tue Mar 16 03:08:18 2004 -> Session 0 stopped due to timeout.
Tue Mar 16 03:35:01 2004 -> Session 0 stopped due to timeout.
Tue Mar 16 03:57:46 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed.
Tue Mar 16 03:57:47 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed.
....and then the whole troubles like in my previous letter.
 The log above is complete, nothing has been cut. There were no mail
except for those timeouts, and when after 3 h from database reloading
new mail arrived, it went wrong way.

                    Krzysztof Snopek


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to