Paul Bijnens wrote:
Trog wrote:
I guess it's a bug in the perl script you two are using, it doesn't
handle high port numbers correctly.
That could well be the case, because that system runs perl 5.6.1 (why
upgrade production systems when all works fine).
A quick check shows 65235 as highest used portnumber (with success).
But next down, port 60999 was used successfully 8 times, while all the
others only once. Maybe a problem in the 61000-~65000 area?
Just finished my coffee. It is not perl, but the OS itself.
Just doing: "nc -vvv -l -p 61000" gives "address already in use",
and that up to port 65234. But there is no process really using it.
I think that range was used by the NAT-module in ipchains.
That machine was planned to be upgraded anyway. (kernel 2.2.19!!
currently uptime 583 days, going back to the last powerfail that
took longer than our UPS could handle.)
Anyway, the error disappeared indeed.
--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation Tel +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e, kill -1 $$, shutdown, *
* kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... *
* ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out *
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
