Hi Andrea:
Just as a shortcut next with yum do:
yum install "postfix*" or yum install "amavisd-new*" or yum install
"clamav*"
Note: the asterisk does the job of telling yum to find any
permutations/spelling variations which follow after the *. Doing this saves
some typing and liberates you from
...again
I installed FC8 and then, with command yum, I installed
yum install postfix
and
yum install amavisd-new
It installed amavisd-new-2.5.2-2.fc8 and the dependencies:
clamav-data-0.92-6.fc8
clamav-filesystem-0.92-6.fc8
clamav-lib-0.92-6.fc8
clamav-server-0.92-6.fc8
clamav-server-sysv-0.92-6.
I installed FC8 with postfix and I would like to install amavisd-new,
spamassassin and clamav.
Which pakages do I have to install to have clamav managed by amavisd-new?
Can you give me a pakages list of clamav?
Thanks
Andrea
___
Help us build a compre
>..but in my situation I haven't group vscan but I have group 'amavis' and
>in
>this group is already present the user 'clamav' but the problem is still
>present ! :-(
>Thanks.
>
>--
>Salvatore.
I have seen that a few times before and the answer is to run clamav as
amavis. This is the second
gt;
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] amavisd-new + clamAV ?
> Thank you for your help,
>
> Although i didn't see which one for primary virus scanning in clamd socket
> of var/log/maillog,
> I added clamav useri
e user 'clamav', and I have enable parameter:
AllowSupplementaryGroups yes
..then my configuration is correct ?! ..but I have always this problem of
slowness.
Thanks.
--
Salvatore.
- Original Message -
From: "Gary V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday,
Thank you for your help,
Although i didn't see which one for primary virus scanning in clamd socket
of var/log/maillog,
I added clamav userid in vscan in /etc/group, then the receiving and sending
the email becomes quite normal.
/etc/group
...
vscan:*:123:clamav
clamav:*:124:
I appreciate f
>Captain Hook wrote:
> > I would like to ask one question.
> > I currently updated amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 clamav-0.90.3 in FreeBSD, and it
> > turned out the speed of sending out and receiving the email becomes so
>slow.
> >
> > I discovered that amavisd-new is proceeding the virus scanning by using
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 07:45, Captain Hook wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> I would like to ask one question.
> I currently updated amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 clamav-0.90.3 in FreeBSD, and it
> turned out the speed of sending out and receiving the email becomes so
> slow.
>
> I discovered that amavisd-new is pro
Captain Hook wrote:
> I would like to ask one question.
> I currently updated amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 clamav-0.90.3 in FreeBSD, and it
> turned out the speed of sending out and receiving the email becomes so slow.
>
> I discovered that amavisd-new is proceeding the virus scanning by using
> clamscan,
Hi, guys,
I would like to ask one question.
I currently updated amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 clamav-0.90.3 in FreeBSD, and it
turned out the speed of sending out and receiving the email becomes so slow.
I discovered that amavisd-new is proceeding the virus scanning by using
clamscan, which takes 2 process
Sorry for the crosspost, but I'm not really sure where this one belongs.
I'm trialling amavisd-new (-p9) and clamav (up to and including 0.73) by
running it over the virus archive created by our existing
amavisd-new/uvscan setup. It seems that there is a category of messages
that uvscan catches bu
One thing I remember finding when I first installed p7 was that the
clamv entry was only included in the @av_scanners_backup list. In order
for it to be considered a primary, it has to be listed in the
@av_scanners list, and I've had it running like that for a long time
without trouble. But jus
I have installed ClamAv and amavisd-new to work with Postfix. They are mostly
working except that when I start amavisd I get the following message in
maillog:
Found secondary av scanner Clam Antivirus - clamscan
at /usr/local/bin/clamscan
When a message is sent to amavisd for scanning I get th
This has probably been covered somewhere, so for those who already know
this, forgive the reiteration.
If you are running Debian with Amavisd-new and Clamav, you will need to
upgrade (for example, apt-get install -t unstable amavisd-new) to the
newest version of amavisd-new (20030616p7-3 as of
I've had amavisd-new and clamav talking over TCP for several weeks now
without any issues at all.
Hanford, Seth wrote:
I'm using ClamAV 0.67-1, currently using Unix sockets.
I'm not too familiar with UNIX sockets, but I'm comfortable with TCP sockets
and communication. Is clamd any more/less r
Hanford, Seth schrieb:
I'm using ClamAV 0.67-1, currently using Unix sockets.
I'm not too familiar with UNIX sockets, but I'm comfortable with TCP sockets
and communication. Is clamd any more/less reliable when running over TCP?
I started clamd briefly using TCP and was able to connect and PING
I'm using ClamAV 0.67-1, currently using Unix sockets.
I'm not too familiar with UNIX sockets, but I'm comfortable with TCP sockets
and communication. Is clamd any more/less reliable when running over TCP?
I started clamd briefly using TCP and was able to connect and PING it, but I
can't get it
amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian)
clamav 0.67-1 (from Debian stable -- I think)
One interesting discovery I've made setting up amavisd-new and
clamav. Amavisd-new seems to expect to find the clamd.ctl socket at
/var/run/clamd.ctl and the default on the version of clamav I have
seemed to be /va
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 at 13:55:53 -, Chris Evans wrote:
> amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian)
> clamav 0.67-1 (from Debian stable -- I think)
>
> One interesting discovery I've made setting up amavisd-new and
> clamav. Amavisd-new seems to expect to find the clamd.ctl socket at
> /var/run/clamd
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 04:17:31PM +0100, Guillaume JULLIEN said:
> Hi,
> I just installed Postfix, amavisd-new and clamd.
>
> When I try to send a mail, I get this :
>
> # telnet localhost 10024
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 [127.0.0.1] ESMTP a
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 at 16:17:31 +0100, Guillaume JULLIEN wrote:
> Hi,
> I just installed Postfix, amavisd-new and clamd.
>
> When I try to send a mail, I get this :
>
> # telnet localhost 10024
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 [127.0.0.1] ESMTP ama
Don't worry about it
I found the error :
Don't forget to write
smtp-amavis in master.cf instead of smtp
Guillaume JULLIEN a écrit :
Hi,
I just installed Postfix, amavisd-new and clamd.
When I try to send a mail, I get this :
# telnet localhost 10024
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Esc
Hi,
I just installed Postfix, amavisd-new and clamd.
When I try to send a mail, I get this :
# telnet localhost 10024
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 [127.0.0.1] ESMTP amavisd-new service ready
MAIL FROM:
250 2.1.0 Sender niber OK
RCPT TO:
250 2.1.5 Reci
Benny Pedersen wrote:
i like to know if anyone have a amavisd.conf for clamdscan
the default are using clamscan, but i like to have clamdscan since i like
to do i with clamd in daemon mode
sorry if this is a faq
thanks
Well, at least the debian version uses clamd (as primary scanner) by
default
i like to know if anyone have a amavisd.conf for clamdscan
the default are using clamscan, but i like to have clamdscan since i like
to do i with clamd in daemon mode
sorry if this is a faq
thanks
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheC
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> clamav wrote:
> >Since I currently have clamd listening on /var/amavis/clamd.socket, can
> >I simply change the above to say:
> >
> > ['Clam Antivirus-clamd',
> > \&ask_daemon, ["CONTSCAN {}\n", '/var/amavis/clamd.socket'],
> > qr/\
clamav wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:27:35AM +0200, Thomas Lamy wrote:
ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
* clamav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030523 01:10]: wrote:
Does anyone know how to setup amavisd-new with clamd? More specifically,
I would like amavisd to talk to clamd (currently running) through
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:27:35AM +0200, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
> >* clamav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030523 01:10]: wrote:
> >
> >>Does anyone know how to setup amavisd-new with clamd? More specifically,
> >>I would like amavisd to talk to clamd (currently running) through t
ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
* clamav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030523 01:10]: wrote:
Does anyone know how to setup amavisd-new with clamd? More specifically,
I would like amavisd to talk to clamd (currently running) through the
local file socket that I have setup in clamd.conf.
If this is possible, pl
* clamav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030523 01:10]: wrote:
> Does anyone know how to setup amavisd-new with clamd? More specifically,
> I would like amavisd to talk to clamd (currently running) through the
> local file socket that I have setup in clamd.conf.
>
> If this is possible, please advise on ho
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:45:33AM -0600, clamav wrote:
> Does anyone know how to setup amavisd-new with clamd? More specifically,
> I would like amavisd to talk to clamd (currently running) through the
> local file socket that I have setup in clamd.conf.
>
> If this is possible, please advise on
Does anyone know how to setup amavisd-new with clamd? More specifically,
I would like amavisd to talk to clamd (currently running) through the
local file socket that I have setup in clamd.conf.
If this is possible, please advise on how. Thank you.
-
Hi,
know anyone where I find a complete perl-package for using with
amavisd-new? It's very hard to find and install the modules step-by-step.
I want to use it with postfix on SuSE 8.0.
TNX!
regards
Juergen Frost
--
r.z.w. cimdata AG
Zum Hospitalgraben 2
99425 Weimar
Tel: +49 (0) 3643 8640 0
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Ronan Lucio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Chris,
>
>I'm sorry for not understand something in the Unix world, yet.
>
>> The code I supplied does fallback to clamscan if clamd fails.
>>
>> You should NOT specify a value for $clamscan in amavisd.conf - if you do
>> clamscan will alw
Chris,
I'm sorry for not understand something in the Unix world, yet.
> The code I supplied does fallback to clamscan if clamd fails.
>
> You should NOT specify a value for $clamscan in amavisd.conf - if you do
> clamscan will always be called, not just if clamd fails.
>
> Either define $clam_
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Ronan Lucio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Chris,
>
>Please, clearify just this point to me
>
>> Basically, I had the code below in my virus_scan() routine. It was then
>> necessary to set ONE of $clamd_sockname (set to path to unix socket),
>> $clamd (set to anything you like - wi
Chris,
Please, clearify just this point to me
> Basically, I had the code below in my virus_scan() routine. It was then
> necessary to set ONE of $clamd_sockname (set to path to unix socket),
> $clamd (set to anything you like - will use INET socket), OR $clamscan
> (path to clamscan - uses clams
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Ronan Lucio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Chris,
>
>Very good your answer. Thank you very very much.
>
>Do you use FreeBSD, too?
>
Yes
>If so, did you upgrade Perl to 5.8?
No, I'm using 5.6.1. I hear of too many problems with 5.8
>Amavisd-new is still in version 20020517 in Fre
Chris,
Very good your answer. Thank you very very much.
Do you use FreeBSD, too?
If so, did you upgrade Perl to 5.8?
Amavisd-new is still in version 20020517 in FreeBSD
ports tree.
I've tried to install Amavisd-20021116 but I didn't
get to make it work yet because the incompatibility
of some per
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 04:00:08PM -0500, Ed Phillips wrote:
>>
>> How would you make it better? clamd seems to work pretty well for us
>> scanning more than 100,000 messages per day. It hasn't crashed or
>> anything... been running perf
Tomasz,
Thank you very much for your answer.
So, I'll wait for the next release because I'm running
FreeBSD-4.6-STABLE.
Thank's,
Ronan
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:06:57 +0100
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 04:00:08PM -0500, Ed Phillips wrote:
> >
> > How would you
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 04:00:08PM -0500, Ed Phillips wrote:
>
> How would you make it better? clamd seems to work pretty well for us
> scanning more than 100,000 messages per day. It hasn't crashed or
> anything... been running perfectly for a couple of weeks under this load.
Currently clamd
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Ken McKittrick wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:50:02 -0500
> From: Ken McKittrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Amavisd-new
>
> Ronan
>
&g
Ok Ken,
Thank you very much for the tip.
> clamd is amazingly fast, but it's VERY experimental. You don't want to
> run it right now.
Ronan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Ronan
clamd is amazingly fast, but it's VERY experimental. You don't want to
run it right now.
I'm in the process of motivating the author to work on making clamd
better.
Sincerely
Ken McKittrick
Nework Engineer
USADatanet
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 01:35 PM, Ronan Lucio wrote:
> Hel
Hello,
I have amavisd-new-20020517 + clamav-0.54 working quite well
with clamscan.
To do so, I needed to added some lines given from Mark Martinec.
Now, I'm trying to get a better performance with clamd,
I just executed clamd, changed the words clamscan to clamdscan
in amavisd file, but it didn'
47 matches
Mail list logo