Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-24 Thread Ian G Batten
On 20 Sep 07, at 2203, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -- Trog said the following on 9/19/07 2:55 PM: >> Forth alternative: use current SVN code, which has it's own regex >> code to >> overcome platform issues. > > Compiled smoothly for me on Solaris 10 x86. It's now running on test > box. Thanks fo

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-24 Thread Andrew Watkins
Dennis Peterson wrote: > > Is it really necessary to use clamscan? It has a lot working against it. > I am not using clamd since it kept dying one me, so until I look into it in more detail I want the slower but reliable clamscan. I am running it via sendmail/mimedfang software. Andrew ___

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-20 Thread clamav-users
-- Trog said the following on 9/19/07 2:55 PM: > Forth alternative: use current SVN code, which has it's own regex code to > overcome platform issues. Compiled smoothly for me on Solaris 10 x86. It's now running on test box. Thanks for the tip. We'll see how it goes. Amos _

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris (was: Major Problem with Clamd Startup)

2007-09-19 Thread Trog
Quoting rick pim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > so: i have three alternatives. in more or less the order of increasing > amount of work: > Forth alternative: use current SVN code, which has it's own regex code to overcome platform issues. -trog ___ Help us b

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Andrew Watkins wrote: > Rick, > > I guess your best bet is to switch off the PhishingScanURLs, if you > don't like the idea of using new code at this stage. > > I am still testing the PCRE on a test server, and I still have my main > server running a crontab script which kills clamscan every no

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
rick pim wrote: > Trog writes: > > You've taken note of the recent postings on trouble with the standard > > Solaris regex library? And how to switch to using PCRE, which solves the > > problem. > > i have. i got this box mostly finished back in early august and then > took off on holidays befo

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-19 Thread Andrew Watkins
Rick, I guess your best bet is to switch off the PhishingScanURLs, if you don't like the idea of using new code at this stage. I am still testing the PCRE on a test server, and I still have my main server running a crontab script which kills clamscan every now and then when it has been workin

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris (was: Major Problem with Clamd Startup)

2007-09-19 Thread rick pim
Trog writes: > You've taken note of the recent postings on trouble with the standard > Solaris regex library? And how to switch to using PCRE, which solves the > problem. i have. i got this box mostly finished back in early august and then took off on holidays before putting it into production.

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris

2007-09-19 Thread Andrew Watkins
Rick, I think sounds like the problem I had with regex in a previous post "Subject: clamscan does not terminate on specific HTMLfile" - down load and install PCRE I got it from freeware: ftp://ftp.virginmedia.com/sites/ftp.sunfreeware.com/freeware/sparc/10/pcre-7.2-sol10-spa

Re: [Clamav-users] performance on solaris (was: Major Problem with Clamd Startup)

2007-09-19 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 10:31 -0400, rick pim wrote: > Rob MacGregor writes: > > Maybe you meant to include some actual technical details, like O/S, > > version of clamav installed etc (and possibly why you restart sendmail > > and clamd daily)? > > it wasn't me that reported it, but i'm on the v

[Clamav-users] performance on solaris (was: Major Problem with Clamd Startup)

2007-09-19 Thread rick pim
Rob MacGregor writes: > Maybe you meant to include some actual technical details, like O/S, > version of clamav installed etc (and possibly why you restart sendmail > and clamd daily)? it wasn't me that reported it, but i'm on the verge of doing the same thing. here's why: environment: solari