On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:18:01PM +0300, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
> In my case, it's the clamav-20030829.tar.gz that was dying so ofetn.
Ups, seems to be our most recent version, too...
> I had to downgrade to the clamav-20030829.tar.gz which apparently is
> stable on my FreeBSD 4.8. I also u
* Marian Eichholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030904 16:18]: wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>
> > >I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail
> > >gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that
> > >"speaks"
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail
> >gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that
> >"speaks" the clamd protocol).
> >
> >clamd in this version is not stable and I wo
> while ICAP would be a really nice addition, the problematic behaviour of
> the STREAM-extension has already been discussed (on clamav-devel) and
> tomasz promised a solution for this :-)
The new protocol in clamd will be available soon.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [
Marc Balmer wrote:
Hi
I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail
gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that
"speaks" the clamd protocol).
clamd in this version is not stable and I wonder if it is the server
part or libclamav thats causing the tro
Hi
I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail
gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that
"speaks" the clamd protocol).
clamd in this version is not stable and I wonder if it is the server
part or libclamav thats causing the trouble.
I have work