Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-08 Thread Internet Helpdesk
I tried clamav-devel-20041105 (with clamav-milter version 0.80p) and now everything seems to start OK, but it doesn't do anything... It must be my server that is f***ed up, but if you can give me some pointers, I would be grateful. I tested clamav-devel-20041105 on another server, and it works jus

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Friday 05 Nov 2004 8:07 am, Evan Pierce wrote: > Went to 0.80p and the problem appears to be solved. My typo, I meant 0.80p, not 0.80o. From the ChangeLog: 0.80p 4/11/04 SESSION: Fix bug causing crash when using LocalSocket mode > Evan -Nigel _

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-05 Thread Joacim Ekroth
Evan Pierce wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Horne Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:47 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault On Thursday 04 Nov 2004 8:28 pm, Joacim Ekroth wrote: I

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-05 Thread Evan Pierce
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Horne Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 9:21 AM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault On Thursday 04 Nov 2004 10:19 pm, Evan Pierce wrote: > > Nope still happen

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-04 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 04 Nov 2004 10:19 pm, Evan Pierce wrote: > > Nope still happens with me for clamav-milter 0.80o In that case please e-mail me a stack trace from gdb. > Evan -Nigel ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-04 Thread Evan Pierce
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Horne Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:47 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault On Thursday 04 Nov 2004 8:28 pm, Joacim Ekroth wrote: > I crawled back

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-04 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 04 Nov 2004 8:28 pm, Joacim Ekroth wrote: > I crawled back to clamav-devel-20041019, where everything is ok... :) Should be ok with 0.80o > /Joacim -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk ___

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-04 Thread Joacim Ekroth
Internet Helpdesk wrote: Sorry to repeat my question but... I've tried to update my clamav-milter... Any version after 0.80j gives a segfault immediately when I try to run it. What information can I provide to help diagnose this problem? If this isn't the proper place to ask a question about the

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-03 Thread Evan Pierce
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Internet Helpdesk Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 8:58 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault >> Is 0.80n any better? > > from 10/30/2004? Nope, sorry.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-03 Thread Internet Helpdesk
Is 0.80n any better? from 10/30/2004? Nope, sorry. Dang. I'm going to have to eat my words. I went to run it (clamav-milter .80n) under gdb and discovered it's not segfaulting anymore, it's running fine. I could swear on a stack of bibles that I was trying to use the very lastest clamav-mil

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-03 Thread Internet Helpdesk
- Original Message - From: "Nigel Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ClamAV users ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:45 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault Is 0.80n any better? from 10/30/2

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-03 Thread Nigel Horne
Is 0.80n any better? -Nigel On Monday 01 Nov 2004 22:57, Internet Helpdesk wrote: > Sorry to repeat my question but... > > I've tried to update my clamav-milter... Any version after 0.80j gives a > segfault immediately when I try to run it. > > What information can I provide to help diagnose

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-11-01 Thread Internet Helpdesk
Sorry to repeat my question but... I've tried to update my clamav-milter... Any version after 0.80j gives a segfault immediately when I try to run it. What information can I provide to help diagnose this problem? If this isn't the proper place to ask a question about the clamav-milter, PLMK. Li

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-10-29 Thread Internet Helpdesk
- Original Message - From: "Internet Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 3:57 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault I've tried to update my clamd & clamav-milter (version 0.75c)... with yesterd

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault

2004-10-29 Thread Internet Helpdesk
I've tried to update my clamd & clamav-milter (version 0.75c)... with yesterday's & todays snapshop. Clamav-milter gives a segfault immediately when trying to run it. It works on a similar test machine though. What information can I provide to help diagnose this? Linux kernel 2.4.22 Thanks, -T

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: segfault & max children problems - partially fixed

2004-02-27 Thread Stephen Gran
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:41:29PM +, Mike Brodbelt said: > I actually grabbed the debian package of 0.67, and updated the source > tree with yesterday's CVS. Looking at it, the debian build script as > distributed does indeed have --enable-debug as a configure option. I'll > rebuild mine, but

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: segfault & max children problems - partially fixed

2004-02-27 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Friday 27 February 2004 10:25 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>ClamAV version devel-20040226, clamav-milter version 0.67h >> >>Started ClamAV & clamav-milter at 12:27 yesterday, and it died due to a >>SIGABRT at 8:45 this morning. > > > In that case you have run configure

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter: segfault & max children problems - partially fixed

2004-02-27 Thread Nigel Horne
On Friday 27 February 2004 10:25 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > ClamAV version devel-20040226, clamav-milter version 0.67h > > Started ClamAV & clamav-milter at 12:27 yesterday, and it died due to a > SIGABRT at 8:45 this morning. In that case you have run configure with --enable-debug. Please rerun

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter: segfault & max children problems - partially fixed

2004-02-27 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Running a CVS snapshot of clamav downloaded yesterday, version info:- ClamAV version devel-20040226, clamav-milter version 0.67h Started ClamAV & clamav-milter at 12:27 yesterday, and it died due to a SIGABRT at 8:45 this morning. To have it running for 20 hours without a problem is one of the b

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter segfault

2004-02-26 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Thomas Lamy wrote: > Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>I've just come across a core dump generated by clamav-milter 0.67d from >>CVS, that occurred during one of it's problem periods. Before I delete >>it, would it hbe of any use to any of the developers? >> >>Mike. >> >> > > Core dumps are _always_ a

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter segfault

2004-02-26 Thread Thomas Lamy
Mike Brodbelt wrote: I've just come across a core dump generated by clamav-milter 0.67d from CVS, that occurred during one of it's problem periods. Before I delete it, would it hbe of any use to any of the developers? Mike. Core dumps are _always_ a valuable resource when it comes to bug squash

[Clamav-users] Clamav-milter segfault

2004-02-26 Thread Mike Brodbelt
I've just come across a core dump generated by clamav-milter 0.67d from CVS, that occurred during one of it's problem periods. Before I delete it, would it hbe of any use to any of the developers? Mike. --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start