Re: [Clamav-users] Sanesecurity.com download disabled

2008-12-12 Thread Luis Miguel R.
El jueves, 11 diciembre del 2008 a las 01:55:45, Steve Basford escribió: > Hi All, > > My webhost disabled sanesecurity.com due to high cpu usage, they could > only give me the following infomation which doesn't mean a lot to me, > but does this sound high? > > Swap: 4096564k total, 408264

Re: [Clamav-users] Sanesecurity.com download disabled

2008-12-12 Thread SM
At 05:55 11-12-2008, Steve Basford wrote: >My webhost disabled sanesecurity.com due to high cpu usage, they could >only give me the following infomation which doesn't mean a lot to me, >but does this sound high? As you are spawning processes on each hit, your scripts can cause high CPU usage

Re: [Clamav-users] Sanesecurity.com download disabled

2008-12-11 Thread dennispe
there services to create a robust DNS farm. I can't provide signature services as my own colo has gotten too expensive for band width. Dp Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "Steve Basford" Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:55:45 To: Subject: [

Re: [Clamav-users] Sanesecurity.com download disabled

2008-12-11 Thread Jeffrey Thomas Peckham
Hey Steve, Unless you're having a lot of hits from bots trying to access the admin area, I'd have to say this script appears to be fairly efficient. If it's a concern you could always remove the admin bits and just update the urlz file by hand. Which version of the script are you running?

Re: [Clamav-users] Sanesecurity.com download disabled

2008-12-11 Thread Robert Schetterer
Steve Basford schrieb: > Hi All, > > My webhost disabled sanesecurity.com due to high cpu usage, they could > only give me the following infomation which doesn't mean a lot to me, > but does this sound high? > > Swap: 4096564k total, 408264k used, 3688300k free, 801468k cached > > PID

[Clamav-users] Sanesecurity.com download disabled

2008-12-11 Thread Steve Basford
Hi All, My webhost disabled sanesecurity.com due to high cpu usage, they could only give me the following infomation which doesn't mean a lot to me, but does this sound high? Swap: 4096564k total, 408264k used, 3688300k free, 801468k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU