Walter Bürger wrote:
> I cleaned the database directory and now clamscan takes
> 12 sec. instead of 14 sec.
clamscan test/* takes 4 seconds on OpenBSD 4.2, and I only have a Core
Duo @ 1.66 Ghz, weird.
> More important is the following:
> If clamd runs in 'Foreground' mode, it works!
> If clamd r
Török Edvin schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Walter Bürger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
clamav-0.93rc1.tar.gz compiles successfully on
OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
(4x Dual-Core AMD Opteron 8218 2.62 GHz)
but then, after starting clamd, it does nothing.
It just sits there an
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Walter Bürger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> clamav-0.93rc1.tar.gz compiles successfully on
> OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
> (4x Dual-Core AMD Opteron 8218 2.62 GHz)
>
> but then, after starting clamd, it does nothing.
> It just sits there and does nothi
Hi,
clamav-0.93rc1.tar.gz compiles successfully on
OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
(4x Dual-Core AMD Opteron 8218 2.62 GHz)
but then, after starting clamd, it does nothing.
It just sits there and does nothing.
It doesn't matter if its called by amavisd or clamdscan - no response.
The caller waits
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:34:56 +
Jonathan Armitage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just unsuccessfully tried to compile on Solaris 10 x86. The build
> fails at:
>
> (cd .libs && rm -f libclamunrar.so && ln -s libclamunrar.so.4.0.0
> libclamunrar.so)
> false cru .libs/libclamunrar.a unrar
aCaB wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It compiled on Solaris 10 (sparc) without any problems. It even appears
>> to have detected the endianness right.
I have just unsuccessfully tried to compile on Solaris 10 x86. The build
fails at:
(cd .libs && rm -f libclamunrar.so && ln -s libclamunrar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It compiled on Solaris 10 (sparc) without any problems. It even appears
> to have detected the endianness right. I have run a few messages through
> it and it appears to detect things correctly. No warnings or error messages
> in either the freshclam or clamd logs so f
It compiled on Solaris 10 (sparc) without any problems. It even appears
to have detected the endianness right. I have run a few messages through
it and it appears to detect things correctly. No warnings or error messages
in either the freshclam or clamd logs so far.
With respect to testing. Ar
Stephen Gran wrote:
> Did he
> accidentally link against an old version?
>
He said he fixed it by purging the old one and installing the RC.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/cla
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:02:07AM -0400, Jack S. Lai said:
> After installing rc1 on a Slackware 12.0 box, the following error is
> generated while trying to start freshclam:
>
> "freshclam: error while loading shared libraries:
> libclamunrar_iface.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such f
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Brandon Perry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That doesn't help... However, I am going to try re-compiling it w/out
> > ANY clamav installed. Maybe it used an old library file that was still
> > on the system (0.92.1).
> >
> Are you sure? I had that same prob
> That doesn't help... However, I am going to try re-compiling it w/out
> ANY clamav installed. Maybe it used an old library file that was still
> on the system (0.92.1).
>
Are you sure? I had that same problem and running ldconfig as root fixed
it. (sudo ldconfig)
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:02:07 -0400
> > "freshclam: error while loading shared libraries:
> > libclamunrar_iface.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> > or directory"
>
> You should run ldconfig
That doesn't
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:21:18 -0500
"Jon R. Kibler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For 0.93RC1 build, I noticed a new 'warning' message when running configure
> on Solaris 9 Sparc box:
> > checking whether FPU byte ordering is bigendian... auto
> > configure: WARNING: Unable to determine FPU endiane
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:39:43 -0500 (CDT)
Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One minor issue - clamscan seems slower to load the database
> now.
> Using 0.92.1 clamscan of a trivial file would take about 4
> seconds.
> With 0.93rc1 clamscan of a trivial file takes about 6 seconds.
It will b
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:02:07 -0400
"Jack S. Lai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's *very* important for us to get your feedback about the changes
> > in 0.93RC1. It's the best time to report any problems with this RC
>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's *very* important for us to get your feedback about the changes
> in 0.93RC1. It's the best time to report any problems with this RC
> so they can get fixed before the final release!
After installing rc1 on a Slackwar
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Dear ClamAV users,
>
> with the release of 0.93RC1 [1] we've made some significant changes
> to the ClamAV engine and tools. The most notable change is the
> new logic of limits - please find the aCaB's post on this here:
> http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080313.165458.ac8
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:24:16 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote
> Dear ClamAV users,
>
> It's *very* important for us to get your feedback about the changes
> in 0.93RC1. It's the best time to report any problems with this RC
> so they can get fixed before the final release!
>
Hi Tomasz
Thanks for all yo
On Mar 17, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:48:57 -0700
>> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I installed it here on Mar 13 and it's been running fine. Problems
>>> in
>>> the log are freshcl
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:48:57 -0700
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I installed it here on Mar 13 and it's been running fine. Problems in
the log are freshclam errors - hell of a mess this am trying to
find a
host that works.
Den
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Dear ClamAV users,
with the release of 0.93RC1 [1] we've made some significant changes
to the ClamAV engine and tools. The most notable change is the
new logic of limits - please find the aCaB's post on this here:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080313.165458.ac80f65a.en.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:48:57 -0700
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed it here on Mar 13 and it's been running fine. Problems in
> the log are freshclam errors - hell of a mess this am trying to find a
> host that works.
Dennis, thanks for your feedback! Are the freshclam
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Dear ClamAV users,
>
> with the release of 0.93RC1 [1] we've made some significant changes
> to the ClamAV engine and tools. The most notable change is the
> new logic of limits - please find the aCaB's post on this here:
> http://lurker.clamav.ne
Dear ClamAV users,
with the release of 0.93RC1 [1] we've made some significant changes
to the ClamAV engine and tools. The most notable change is the
new logic of limits - please find the aCaB's post on this here:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080313.165458.ac80f65a.en.html
The changes not
Hello all,
I have just uploaded packages for clamav 0.90rc2 to Debian experimental.
I am requesting testing and feedback about the upgrade path. Besides all
the usual new features and better detection methods, this upgrade changes
the config file format in an incompatible way - all options that w
26 matches
Mail list logo
