HI
> > webmasters using BMPs?? I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or
pngs and
> That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people
will be people.
Maybe for usuall users. But not for WebMasters.
> I disabled it as we had too many people who seem to be sending large BM
Jason Haar wrote the following on 08/29/2004 11:26 AM :
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
webmasters using BMPs?? I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or pngs
and
That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people will
be people.
I personal
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> webmasters using BMPs?? I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or pngs
> and
That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people will
be people.
I personally think that compression option should be classified the
Quoting Thierry Jaboeuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello All
I use an Debian-Linux Box here at work for 6 month now
For Email server.
No problem with Calmav until yesterday...
It seems our WebMaster want to send part of a new web site
To someone...
I got an Oversized zip alert.
One file on the zip is qui
Thierry Jaboeuf wrote the following on 08/25/2004 12:17 PM :
Hello All
I use an Debian-Linux Box here at work for 6 month now
For Email server.
No problem with Calmav until yesterday...
It seems our WebMaster want to send part of a new web site
To someone...
I got an Oversized zip alert.
One file o
Hello All
I use an Debian-Linux Box here at work for 6 month now
For Email server.
No problem with Calmav until yesterday...
It seems our WebMaster want to send part of a new web site
To someone...
I got an Oversized zip alert.
One file on the zip is quite amazing...
A BMP picture file of 115254
