Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> In general:
>>
>> DO NOT HARDCODE POLICY
>>
>> Otherwise, your tool becomes irritating or possibly even harmful.
>>
>
> In general, don't distribute code that allows remote root exploit of systems.
>
>
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> I've had a feeling for several posts that we have not been having the
> same conversation. I've never seen anything but Windows viruses in the
> nearly 30 years I've been doing this but that's not what we're talking
> about. We're talking about the probability that Wind
Jason Haar wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> P0f maybe? Although with my experience it has never been that accurate
>> and is easy to fool if one so desires.
>>
> We're using p0f integrated into Qmail-Scanner to track what OS is
> associated with incoming SMTP connections.
>
> Just to add
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Joe Sloan wrote:
>> Perhaps our sample size is too small, but it certainly seems that this
>> whole overhyped idea of viruses apart from ms windows is a non-issue in
>> practice.
> How are able to determine that? There's nothing in the co
Gerard wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:59:05 -0700
> Joe Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> John Rudd wrote:
>
>>> Just because they're in a non-windows environment doesn't mean they
>>> can't possibly be sending out viruses. The
John Rudd wrote:
> Just because they're in a non-windows environment doesn't mean they
> can't possibly be sending out viruses. The person who expressed that
> is, as I said, being naive. And, irresponsible.
While it's fine to talk theory, the facts of the matter are fairly
clear. We run ma
John Rudd wrote:
> Joe Sloan wrote:
>> John Rudd wrote:
>>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>> And to follow up on the earlier
>>>> point about Windows systems not being the sole source of spam/virus
>>>> distribution,
>>> The idea that an
John Rudd wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> And to follow up on the earlier
>> point about Windows systems not being the sole source of spam/virus
>> distribution,
>
>
> The idea that any platform (windows, unix/linux, etc.) attached to the
> net cannot be subverted into being a spam/virus z
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Joe Sloan wrote:
>> It's not unthinkable, there actually are places where microsoft software
>> is not used.
>
> Doesn't matter - there's no reason to suspect that all viruses originate
> from Windows. Could I have your outgoing s
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Ben wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:37 AM, taj home <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> please dont email me.
>> I'm not emailing you.
>
> I think he's suggesting that he'd prefer you not mail him because of
> your idiot policy on outgoing virus scanning.
Come now, that's
Tyler wrote:
> Does ClamAV for Linux detect a Windows or Mac virus?
The clamav for linux is pretty much only for windows viruses, since
linux is often used as a server for windows clients.
> Is the virus database the same no matter what platform the scanner is running
> on so that viruses int
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> I saw a little list chatter when 0.84-RC1 came out about a few problems.
> I haven't seen any messages at all about RC2. Does that mean that
> people are running it successfully and smoothly?
RC2 on FreeBSD up for 3 days now...
D.
__
Chris de Vidal wrote:
> > <12 line signature snipped>
>
> You'll like my newer, shorter one :-)
>
> CD
>
> Ever lied? You're a liar. Ever stolen? You're a theif. Ever hated?
> The bible equates hate with murder. Ever lusted? Jesus equated lust with
> adultery. You've broken God's law. H
13 matches
Mail list logo
