On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:11:13PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> She doesn't have version 1245, as explained earlier. She probably has
> a
> DNS server returning the wrong version, and she should look into why
> that is. Maybe one of her forwarders caches too long or something.
But she was using
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Niek wrote:
> The update was released a few minutes after you started this thread :)
But on my friends amchine she still get,
# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jan 18 22:59:58 2006
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES
See the
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:11:19PM -0500, Chris Conn wrote:
> update your defs, version 1245 gets it.
I updated and it was found. But that is weird, I always update every 1
hour and just a few mins back I manually tried to update, but the virus
was not detected and now it is. I am interested in
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:04:27PM +0200, Cevher wrote:
> You can create a temporary signature...
Please tell me how. I read signatures.pdf but ...
$ sigtools --md5 virus_file > temp.hdb
What do I do after that? I use clamd, so do I need to restart it?
With warm regards,
-Payal
___
Hi,
Me and many friends here are troubled by a new virus which has
attachments like Video_part.mim, Attachment.hqx etc. We are getting this
since last 36 hours and a friend submitted a few samples to clamav
interface 7 hours back. Symantech detects it since today morning, but
clamav is still no
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:52:57AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Take a look at contrib/trashscan and use it instead of clamdscan in
> .qmail.
It needs procmail, which I don't use. Also logger [???]
What is wrong with calmdscan? It caught eicar properly.
With regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Succ
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:38:17AM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> >
> You need to enable at least the "ScanMail" and "ScanArchive" directives
> in /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf (or whereever that file resides).
I did it. Stopped clamd. Restarted it. Still no luck. Same problem.
Where exactly is the pro
Hi,
I am using clamdscan with qmail in conjuction with dot-qmail files.
I have in .qmail
| /usr/local/bin/clamdscan -; [ $? != 1 ] || exit 99
./Maildir/
# ps aux | grep clamd
root 7967 0.0 4.2 29396 10776 ? S20:54 0:00 clamd
When I send a eicar test vrus it was caught properly
Hi,
I cannot seem to get clamdscan to work. I did,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo $?
0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ps waux | grep clam
root 27470 0.0 0.2 3536 632 pts/0D19:18 0:00 grep clam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan 1
connect(): Connection r
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 01:36:51AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:21:02 +0100
> Peter Bonivart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Isn't it time to stop supporting the old db format? Version 0.65 has
> > been out for two months now and lot's of people seem to have
> > "problems"
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:30:07PM +1100, Mick Pollard wrote:
> FWIW I am getting the same errors. Fresh install on a devl box.
> Clam 0.65 running : /usr/bin/freshclam -d -c 2 -l /var/log/freshclam.log
I updated my definitions just 1 mins back. They seem ok.
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Sto
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:09:34AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks. i suspect my invocation needs to be different - when i switch from
> clamscan to clamdscan, messages are processed - for example - rather than
> taking 10 seconds, 20 seconds, etc with clamscan, they claim 'ok' in .1
>
Hi,
On one machine where I had forgotten to update the database for 2
months, I am getting and error,
# freshclam
Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav
Checking for a new database - started at Fri Jan 9 08:30:45 2004
Connected to clamav.elektrapro.com.
Reading md5 sum (viruses.md5): OK
R
Hi all,
Recently I noticed that Norton AV clears more than 60,000 viruses,
maybe other virus scanners also have similar numbers, why do we have a
very less number? Is it because we do not have big database or we
protect against new viruses only and keep new definition updated?
I personally had no p
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:49:20AM +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 3:39:16 +0000, Payal Rathod wrote:
> >
> > Well, I got the general idea. But I am not getting what difference will
> > it make to change,
> > #define ZIPOSDET 20 to say 70
>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:47:22AM +, Payal Rathod wrote:
> People at qmail-scanner that it is not qmail-scanner issue, they say
> that the file is blocked by clamscan and wit exits with "virus" error
> code. Can you tell me what is wrong?
>
> I don't want to
Hi,
I use qmail-scanner and clamcan. Recently, in my qmail-scanner logs I
received strange logs like,
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:59:56 +0530 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding activation Report of 8.12.03
Oversized Zip clamscan: 0.65.
People at qmail-scanner that it is not qmail-scan
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:16:38PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > Hi,
> > A friend sent me a sample old virus which is not detected by clamscan. I
> > want to add that viruses signature in my copy of clamscan. [He has
> > already sent a copy to clamscan]. How to do it?
> > I read the docs and tried
Hi,
A friend sent me a sample old virus which is not detected by clamscan. I
want to add that viruses signature in my copy of clamscan. [He has
already sent a copy to clamscan]. How to do it?
I read the docs and tried to follow them, but I was getting nowhere.
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
"Visit
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:26:02PM -0500, Tom Walsh wrote:
>
> I have written a shell script wrapper for clamscan (more specifically
> clamdscan/clamd) that I call from maildrop... If you want to see the
> maildrop script message me offline as it isn't 100% relevant to this list.
I will check the
Hi,
Does anyone have an idea if it is possible to use clamav directly from
a dot-qmail file or maybe with maildrop (i.e. without using any virus handler)?
Can someone hint on this? I have user level access to the system.
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles vi
Hi,
I am scanning a big disk.
How do I save the names of infected files to a file?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
"Visit GNU/Linux Success Stories"
http://payal.staticky.com
Guest-Book Section Updated.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:Thi
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:46:27AM -0700, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> --- Payal Rathod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I love clam antivirus. It has caught many of Sobig virus on my server.
> > Does anyone has report on how it competes against commercial viruscanner
> >
Hi,
Is it possible to download the updates manually and transfer therm on
floppy or CD to a machine which does not have internet access but just
local LAN access?
If yes, how to do it?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:19:25PM -0700, Scott Kveton wrote:
> > > We use clamav in addition to Norton Anti-virus on our Exchange servers.
> > > We relay all of the mail to our Exchange servers through our Linux
> > > machines first with clamav + amavisd-new + spamassassin in between.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:32:43AM -0700, Scott Kveton wrote:
> > I love clam antivirus. It has caught many of Sobig virus on my server.
> > Does anyone has report on how it competes against commercial viruscanner
> > and is anyone using it on a production server?
>
> We use clamav in addition to
Hi,
I love clam antivirus. It has caught many of Sobig virus on my server.
Does anyone has report on how it competes against commercial viruscanner
and is anyone using it on a production server?
Thanks a lot and bye.
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
"Visit GNU/Linux Success Stories"
http://payal.sta
27 matches
Mail list logo
