On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:09:34AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks. i suspect my invocation needs to be different - when i switch from
> clamscan to clamdscan, messages are processed - for example - rather than
> taking 10 seconds, 20 seconds, etc with clamscan, they claim 'ok' in .1
> seconds, .7 seconds, etc - which doesn't seem possible.
I missed the first few mails, but if you are worried if your mails are
really scanned and if you are using qmail and qmail-scanner then you
might want to look at headers to verify.
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
