On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:19:25PM -0700, Scott Kveton wrote:
> > > We use clamav in addition to Norton Anti-virus on our Exchange servers.
> > > We relay all of the mail to our Exchange servers through our Linux
> > > machines first with clamav + amavisd-new + spamassassin in between.
> > >
> > > Over a million messages a day and no complaints:
> > >
> > > http://www.net.oregonstate.edu/cgi-bin/mailgraph.cgi
> >
> > Wowww!!! that is great. But are the viruses caught by clamscan or
> > Norton?
> > Can I just use clamscan?
> > Do you personally recommend it?
>
> Everything in the above graph was caught with clamav ... I don't have
> any statistics on Norton AV v. clamav. I actually use clamd and connect
> to it out of amavisd-new ... I have clamscan as the backup but never go
> to it as clamd hasn't failed on me yet.
I LOVE CLAMD.
But can you give some rough stats/estimates about viruses which escaped
from clamd but were caught by Norton?
Thanks.
-Payal
> I highly recommend clamav.
>
> Scott :-)
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
