vocal members of this list at least, Scott Adams seems to have the right
idea (http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/):
"Let me begin by saying I don’t debate with advocates. An advocate says
that everything is right about one position and everything is wrong
about the other side. You might as wel
Chris,
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal members of this
list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see it as suffering.
Forgive me if I
etter if they create a secure, stable, successful,
packaged configuration and everyone (which happens to also include me!)
benefits from their knowledge. Or does that sound like flamebait?
Jim
--
Jim Redman
(505) 662 5156 x85
http://www.ergotech.com
___
there is a problem and so that a solution is required.
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Redman
(505) 662 5156 x85
http://www.ergotech.com
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
solid, foolproof
installation would help people to avoid security problems - like having
gcc on a firewall. In this case, if such an install existed you might
not have been tempted to build from source and so closed one more hole
on your system.
Jim
--
Jim Redman
(505) 662 5156 x85
James,
James Kosin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Redman wrote:
Of all the packages I install (Fedora), clamav is the only modern
package that fails to install and just work.
<<-- snip -->>
Jim
You are ranting to the wrong group of people. ClamAV
Steve,
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:12:03 -0700
Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
My take on your post is that installing software blindly on a multi-user system
is at best irresponsible. On a workstation on your desk, the effects of your
actions are limited
orum questions related to the lack of simple
installation).
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Redman
(505) 662 5156 x85
http://www.ergotech.com
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
