7; is not available.
Assuming I do not receive any bug reports, I intend to transfer the script to
Steve by this weekend so he can upload it to his site.
Thanks
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
On Thursday November 15, 2007 at 06:18:40 (AM) Ian Eiloart wrote:
[ ... ]
> Oh, but wait. What's going on here? You upgrade ClamAV and your
> configuration changes? That shouldn't happen at all. Are you using an
> installer tool that overwrites your deployed configuration? Surely not!
Excellen
On Wednesday November 14, 2007 at 11:04:15 (AM) DINH Viêt Hoà wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 4:56 PM, Colin Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:41:05 +0100, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote:
> >
> > An interesting task, but one that takes a lot of time, and puts a lot
> > of responsability on
On Wednesday November 14, 2007 at 01:01:44 (PM) Török Edwin wrote:
> You can filter based on "virus found name", and those containing
> 'Heuristics' can go to your special folder.
> Or you can turn the feature entirely off.
>
> [1] http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20071114.165015.e815b938.en.html
On Monday November 12, 2007 at 04:22:47 (PM) David F. Skoll wrote:
> Really? All posters on this thread who gave an opinion wanted
> PhishingScanURLs off by default. I invite users who want
> PhishingScanURLs to be on by default to come forward; I'll happily go
> with the majority decision.
Cou
On Monday November 12, 2007 at 02:48:51 (PM) David F. Skoll wrote:
[ ... ]
> It's not so difficult, but it leads to support calls (we have a large
> number of clients who are not particularly Linux-savvy and who
> hesitate to edit configuration files.) We've configured our packages
> to turn off
On Monday November 12, 2007 at 01:29:41 (PM) David F. Skoll wrote:
> A request: When replying to an e-mail, please change the subject if it
> no longer reflects the thread topic. I've been eagerly awaiting word
> on my complaings about PhishingScanURLs from Clam developers and the
> misleading su
When 'freshclam' downloads an updated definition file, it checks it
prior to installing it. I am writing a small shell script that I want
to use that will do essentially the same thing without using
'freshclam'.
What is the syntax to use to check a file to insure it is not broken
before installing
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:20:52 +0200
Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running clamav 0.90 on linux and i've been running freshclam once
> a day. Some days ago the clamd stopped working due to a missing
> database. I found out that it was freshclam that destroyed the
> database. After running
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:20:15 +0200
Matthias Häker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is not a option because the server are leased virtual racks in a
> datacenter
>
> 0.90 didnt compile with a problem with pthread in configure but
> 0.90.1 did without any error and is running fine beside dying f
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:32:13 +0400
Anton Yuzhaninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Matthias.
>
> You wrote on Friday, April 13, 2007, 8:44:34 PM:
>
> > i get a compile error on FreeBSD 4.8
>
> > i have 3 production Server running under FreeBSD 4.8
>
> Try to build it from ports.
I t
On Thursday April 12, 2007 at 12:21:32 (PM) James Bourne wrote:
> This brings a question to my mind.
>
> Is there any need for the old .cvd files now that clamd uses the incremental
> files?
I took this approach to the problem (freebsd)
I shutdown clamav and freshclam.
Deleted all of the files
On Monday April 09, 2007 at 02:43:23 (AM) Julia Ovchinnikova wrote:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > On Friday April 06, 2007 at 08:16:27 (AM) Julia Ovchinnikova wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > You stated that you are using FreeBSD-6.0 on your PC. I am using version
>
On Monday April 09, 2007 at 02:43:23 (AM) Julia Ovchinnikova wrote:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > On Friday April 06, 2007 at 08:16:27 (AM) Julia Ovchinnikova wrote:
> >
> > You stated that you are using FreeBSD-6.0 on your PC. I am using version
> > 6.2 with clamav-deve
On Friday April 06, 2007 at 08:16:27 (AM) Julia Ovchinnikova wrote:
> I have FreeBSD 6.0+ClamAV 0.90.1+ clamav-devel-latest, but clamav is not
> checked test virus signature.
> freshclam.log :
>
> Current working dir is /var/db/clamav
> freshclam daemon 0.90.1 (OS: freebsd6.0, ARCH: i386, CPU: i
On Friday April 06, 2007 at 04:52:57 (AM) Julia Ovchinnikova wrote:
> I have FreeBSD 6.0+ClamAV 0.90.1+ clamav-devel-latest, but clamav is not
> checked test virus signature.
> freshclam.log is attached
Attaching files is not an option with this list. You will either have to
post the file somepl
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:54:34 +0300
Henrik Krohns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:18:00PM -0700, Gary Casterline wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 07:36:11PM +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:29:07PM -0400, Gerard Seibert
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:29:06 -0400
Rick Pim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> system: 4 CPU Sun E450, solaris 5.9, gcc 3.4.3
>
> before i start: i don't have a copy of gdb on this system, so i'm
> unable to provide a debug log.
[snip]
Would it be possible to install one?
http://ftp.gnu.org/g
On Saturday March 31, 2007 at 12:25:49 (PM) Bit Fuzzy wrote:
> I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing.
>
> We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but
> good things to say about it.
> That is until we updated to version 90.1
>
> Since the update an
On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
> I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
> enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
> Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
> Help please.
Versions of FreeBSD <= 5.5 are
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 04:50:05 (PM) jean-paul natola wrote:
> So now that I have already upgraded to 90.1 ( on freebsd 5.4) what can I do
> get this working?
>
> my clam is crashing constatnly -
OK, this is untested, but you can try it anyway.
Do you have 'compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_7 ' in
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 04:09:50 (PM) Rob MacGregor wrote:
> Further testing shows that, for FreeBSD 5.4 at least, the use of -lthr
> (1:1 Threading Library) the result is instability. The second I added
> that to the configure argument clamd started crashing.
>
> Using the alternative -lp
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 02:25:59 (PM) jean-paul natola wrote:
> I updated my ports and when when I install clamav it only brings me to 90_3
> and upon running freshclam- it tells me to upgrade to 90.1
Did you shutdown both the clamav and freshclam daemons? Try rebooting
and see it that wor
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:12:37 -0400
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just realized to my horror that clamav has not found a virus in any
> email handled by my server since March 5th when I upgraded to clamav
> 0.90.1. The messages are being tagged appropriately, e.g.:
>
> X-Virus-Sta
On Wednesday March 14, 2007 at 08:15:15 (AM) Sergey Shilov wrote:
>
> And now on a theme:
> The problem is visible into logs at a stage of configure.
> Clamav-0.87 finds GMP libraries (libgmp-4.1.4_2), and clamav-0.90.1 does not
> find
OK, we have ascertained that you are using FreeBSD. Try thi
On Wednesday March 14, 2007 at 06:28:20 (AM) Rob MacGregor wrote:
> Well, update the ports tree, uninstall/remove the existing clamav
> install and then install clamav from the ports instead :)
You might want to make sure that you kill all of the running clamav
processes first as a precaution. Al
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:00:54 GMT
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In earnest, can't say as I'm very inspired to upgrade (from 0.88.7)
> yet. Ranging from various serious pthread problems to excessive CPU
> usage, to unlinking of pid files, to clamd dying, none of this makes
> me feel inclined muc
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:20:37 -0800
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> If you checked your outgoing mail I wouldn't have to check it when it
> gets to my server. The only reason I have to check other people's
> mail at all is because they don't.
Personally, I think you are being
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:23:33 -0800
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if anyone ever reads the admonishments about top-posting and
> pruning messages.
They read it, they just choose to ignore it. It is for that reason that
I will usually only reply to a top-poster once and the
On Thursday March 01, 2007 at 12:45:20 (PM) John W. Baxter wrote:
> The way our system operates, we learned of the problem well after the 700
> permissions were set up, when I restarted our mail processing system for
> another reason. (We run two processing systems per machine--handling
> submitt
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Antonio Storni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using this FreeBSD package.
>
> File: clamav-0.88.7_1.tgz 744 KB 12/30/2006
> 12:49:00 PM
>
> My question now is:
> Is this clamav Vulnerable?
>
> Thanks for your information.
I am not
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:34:24 +1300
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thankyou for your informative suggestion. I posted as an example of
> what a correctly set up mail client from someone in New Zealand
> should look like for an argumentative poster, also from godzone, to
> see what thei
On Saturday February 17, 2007 at 04:20:22 (AM) Steve Holdoway wrote:
> OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
Please don't top post. If you don't know what that means, Google for it.
I am assuming you are referring to: Christchurch, New Zealand .
Check out these two URLS, whi
On Tuesday January 16, 2007 at 12:44:15 (AM) Nick wrote:
> Hi?
> I am running a FreeBSD 6.0 and clamav 0.88.2_4. I have done a port upgrade
> intending to upgrade to 0.88.7 but still this is what I get :
>
> # portupgrade -v clamav
> ---> Session started at: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:38:20 +0300
> **
On Saturday December 30, 2006 at 07:26:57 (PM) Sander Holthaus wrote:
> The issue is that email never was designed to be used in that
> particular fashion. While it may be fast and almost instant in normal
> circumstances, it was not designed with that in mind. The fact that
> businesses do expect
On Saturday December 16, 2006 at 04:41:39 (AM) Mark wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: zaterdag 16 december 2006 10:37
> > To: 'ClamAV users ML'
> > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1
> >
> >
> > > The curl po
On Friday December 15, 2006 at 07:31:52 (AM) Péter Simon wrote:
> Simon Péter írta:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Yesterday I updated on my server from clamav 0.88.6 to clamav 0.88.7. In
> > daytime ClamAV detected a lot of Oversized.Zip from our partners. It was a
> > little bit starnge because they're
On Friday December 15, 2006 at 06:49:42 (AM) Mark wrote:
> I'm having trouble with curl on FreeBSD 4.11 and clamav-0.88.7_1:
>
> ===> Compressing manual pages for curl-7.15.5_1
> ===> Running ldconfig
> /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
> ===> Registering installation for curl-7.15.5_1
> rea
On Monday December 11, 2006 at 10:11:46 (AM) Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:06:39AM -0500, Gerard Seibert said:
> > What is the preferred method to force clamd to reload its databases?
>
> The simplest is:
> echo RELOAD | nc localhost 3310
OK, I have to a
What is the preferred method to force clamd to reload its databases?
--
Gerard
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Friday December 08, 2006 at 12:19:14 (AM) Noel Jones wrote:
> I'm pleased with clamav's detection of phish, but I'm really
> impressed with Steve Basford's add-on rules for phish and other
> malicious non-viral email. I strongly recommend them.
> http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/
I hardil
On Wednesday November 29, 2006 at 04:17:30 (AM) Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 15:05 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > On Tuesday November 28, 2006 at 02:13:29 (PM) Per Jessen wrote:
> >
> > > Quick additional comment - I used to use the very same argument,
On Tuesday November 28, 2006 at 02:13:29 (PM) Per Jessen wrote:
> Quick additional comment - I used to use the very same argument, but
> experience and age have taught me that people are stupid.
I would not say that. Perhaps absent-minded, absorbed, abstracted,
aimless, amnesic, benighted, bird-b
On Wednesday November 08, 2006 at 11:16:21 (AM) Sergei Lavrov wrote:
> Some of the businesses I know do want to make
> donations. But is ClamAV able to issue invoice ?
In other words, you are looking for a tax write off.
Exactly what is the tax status of 'ClamAV'? I know I could probably look
it
On Friday October 27, 2006 at 08:42:34 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Not to change the direction on you, but you might want to take advantage
> of the work Steve Basford is doing at
> http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/ for phishing problems, and also look
> at http://www.msrbl.com/site/stats f
7;whitelist' as specified. I am beginning to wonder if
perhaps it is a bug.
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Monday October 23, 2006 at 01:20:54 (PM) Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> [ ...heated debate aside :-), these questions are interesting... ]
> > Is there really much practical value to outbound scanning?
>
> Yes. I've seen employees download viral mail fr
On Monday October 23, 2006 at 11:49:47 (AM) Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > On Sunday October 22, 2006 at 09:49:38 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >
> >> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would rather not use the '--fo
On Monday October 23, 2006 at 07:01:47 (AM) Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
>
> > Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These
> > mailings range from 750 to 2000 messag
On Sunday October 22, 2006 at 09:49:38 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
>
> >
> > I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not
> > particularly interested in scanning outgoing mail. Perhaps someone has
> > an idea h
FreeBSD 6.1
Postfix-2.4-20061006
Clamav-milter 0.88.5
I am trying to get clamav-milter working with Postfix. I finally got it
to work, so to speak, but only after using the '-f' aka '--force-scan)'
flag. Without that flag, clamav-milter will only scan outgoing files,
and then only if I use the '--
On Saturday 21 October 2006 10:24, Christian Rueger wrote:
> what your problem?
> it so easy
>
> postfix main.cf:
> smtpd_milters = unix:/clamav/milter
>
> postfix work in chroot /var/spool/postfix
>
> clamav-milter fake sendmail.mc:
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(‘clmilter’,‘S=unix:/var/spool/postfix/clamav
FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE
ClamAV 0.88.5
clamav-milter 0.88.5
Postfix-2.4-20061006
I previously had clamav-milter working on a PC with 'Sendmail' as the
MTA. My new system has 'Postfix' installed. I have no desire to change
this, therefore I would like to know how to get the clamav-milter to
operate with
On Monday October 16, 2006 at 08:26:03 (AM) Bigmonkey Bigmonkey wrote:
> Hi,all
> I am taking use of clamav-0.88.4 with Postfix-2.3.3,1 under FreeBSD
> 6.1Release. Now, I am using before-queue smtpd_milter to take virus
> checking.
> But the daemon, clamav-milter, often goes down and takes these e
pl
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE system with Perl 5.8.8 loaded.
If anyone can assist me, I would appreciate it.
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
sabling in etc/rc.conf works just fine for me. I just let
it run as daemon.
Perhaps there is something else wrong on your OS. If this was really a
software bug, then everyone, or at least a large number of users would
be suffering this problem. I see no evidence of that anywhere. Perhaps
an out
are meant as a source of information, not a classroom
where posters are routinely given research assignments. Perhaps we can
start a risorgimento for the concept of helping others. Then, perhaps
not.
My 2¢ and last post on this topic.
Ciao!
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
attitude
that he/she already knows the subject. It saves me a lot of aggravation
and him (the student) embarrassment.
All in all, I fail to see what peccadillo the poster made. Even the
simplest problem for some can appear to be pointillistic to others.
--
Gerard Seib
rum:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
lity that a new or
improved 'phishing' sig might be available but that hardly justifies the
effort required to rescan every bit of mail. The days of someone routinely
replying back to a 'PayPay - Your Account is Disabled' or whatever are in
serious decline.
upport Sendmail type milters. Does any have this running under Postfix
now? If so, would they be willing to share their configuration with me?
Thanks!
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
of that, any mailserver virus scanner that does not
catch this E-mail WILL almost certainly allow future viruses through.
Is this considered normal? I tried several different tests, and most
were never detected.
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
to adding an X-Header to the email, or actually adding a
disclaimer to the end of the actual message?
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Men say of women what pleases them; women do with men what pleases them.
DeSegur
___
http://lurker.clamav.
nks.
It would really help if you stated what OS you are using. I am familiar
with FreeBSD. If you are using that OS, a startup script for Clamd and
Freshclam were installed for you. All you need do is activate them in
the /etc/rc.conf file.
Ciao!
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I love
e to start. It gives a permission denied error
message.
--whitelist-file=/usr/home/ges/Text/whitelist.txt
I have chmod'd the file to 0666 and changed the ownership to Clamav, but
that does not seem to have helped.
Perhaps someone has a suggestion as to what is causing this problem?
Thank
ted if it is
empty? Why the double '//' in the path? Also, shouldn't the file with
the virus actually have something attached to it. Most of the time on
WinXP machines anyway, there is a file attachment of some kind, although
I guess that is not a requirement.
I am just curious as
d with that virus. It was getting through my
mail server running ClamAV, but fortunately getting caught on a WinXP
machine running Zone Alarm Suite.
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
a directory
"/var/mail/quarantine" in which quarantined email is supposed to go. I
assume that I would send the suspected email message from that directory
for analyses. Is that correct?
Ciao
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
from the mail server it detects this virus. It
has happened three times in the past 24 hours. The messages are marked
as clean by ClamAV.
Is this something that I should be reporting to someone?
Thanks!
--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http
When I issue the command as root:
clamd PING
I receive the following error message:
ERROR: You must select server type (local/tcp).
I assume that I am suppose to change something in the clamd.conf file,
but I am unsure as to what.
--
Gerard E. Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I am sure that this question has been asked before; however, I am unable
to locate the answer I need.
I am a new user of Clam. I have it installed on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine.
Upon bootup, this message is displayed:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter: socket-addr (local:/var/run/clamav/clamav.sock)
does
71 matches
Mail list logo
