On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Al Varnell wrote:
clamd loads the database on launch and does not update it unless notified by
freshclam that an update has taken place. Did your last freshclam run say
that clamd was notified?
Drat. The freshclam config did not have NotifyClamd set. I thought I had
check
On 8/10/10 5:45 AM, "Steve Thompson" wrote:
>> it's possible that the signature was not available at the time mail was
>> received but it is available now.
>
> Yes, this is true in general, but in my case the available signatures were
> the same in both cases (clamscan was run only an hour or tw
Hello
I've been trying (unsuccessfuly )to config an on access scanning using Clamav
0.95.3 an Dazuko 3.0, I have Dazuko compiled, and instaled, I created the
node /dev/dazuko with 660 permitions, owned by root and clamav group,
serverbiblioteca:/etc/clamav# ls -l /dev/dazuko
crw-rw 1 root
>> I forget whether clamav-milter uses clamd, but I notice that you
>> ran *clamscan* instead of *clamdscan*. Clamscan will load up
>> the databases itself, so there exists the possibility that it's
>> using *different* databases than clamd/clamav-milter is.
>
> You're right; I used clamscan and
On 08/10/2010 09:15 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, C. Bensend wrote:
I forget whether clamav-milter uses clamd, but I notice that you
ran *clamscan* instead of *clamdscan*. Clamscan will load up
the databases itself, so there exists the possibility that it's
using *different*
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, C. Bensend wrote:
I forget whether clamav-milter uses clamd, but I notice that you
ran *clamscan* instead of *clamdscan*. Clamscan will load up
the databases itself, so there exists the possibility that it's
using *different* databases than clamd/clamav-milter is.
You're
On 8/10/2010 8:15 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, C. Bensend wrote:
I forget whether clamav-milter uses clamd, but I notice that
you
ran *clamscan* instead of *clamdscan*. Clamscan will load up
the databases itself, so there exists the possibility that it's
using *different* data
>> On 10.08.10 06:35, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> Clamav-milter is used to check incoming e-mail. There are many examples
>>> that are passed as clean and delivered, with these headers inserted:
>>>
>>> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at
>>> X-Virus-Status: Clean
>>>
>>> However, a clamscan o
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.08.10 06:35, Steve Thompson wrote:
Clamav-milter is used to check incoming e-mail. There are many examples
that are passed as clean and delivered, with these headers inserted:
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at
X-Virus-Status: Cle
On 10.08.10 06:35, Steve Thompson wrote:
> Clamav 0.96.1, Centos 5.5, x86_64.
>
> Clamav-milter is used to check incoming e-mail. There are many examples
> that are passed as clean and delivered, with these headers inserted:
>
> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at
> X-Virus-Status: Clean
>
Hello, I'm also seeing large memory usage of freshclam in Gentoo x86-64,
there is a memory graph here: http://imagebin.ca/view/V-BshuFl.html In the
graph you can see the big memory usage of freshclam around June and
subsequent OOM kill. Now it's happening again. For the moment I will keep
freshclam
Clamav 0.96.1, Centos 5.5, x86_64.
Clamav-milter is used to check incoming e-mail. There are many examples
that are passed as clean and delivered, with these headers inserted:
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at
X-Virus-Status: Clean
However, a clamscan of the delivered messages (maildi
12 matches
Mail list logo
