Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Chris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > > Feb 28 08:28:31 localhost freshclam[9014]: Clamd successfully notified > > about the update. > > Feb 28 08:28:31 localhost clamd[4553]: Reading databases > > from /var/lib/clamav > > Feb 28 08:28:31 localhost freshclam[9014]: SubmitDetect

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Landry wrote: > Nathan Brink wrote: >> Gary L Burnore wrote: That is correct, no X. >>> Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. >>> >>> Make sure some sort of display variable is set. >>> >>> (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not alread

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 OSX 10.5 issues

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Bill Landry wrote: > Tom Shaw wrote: >> Some issues: >> >> socat ran fine on 0.94.2 but on 0.95.rc1 >> >> echo PING|socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket >> >> is silent yet I can type > > Tom, are you sure that is the correct path to your clamd.socket? Just > curious, because socat if working and respon

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 OSX 10.5 issues

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Tom Shaw wrote: > Some issues: > > socat ran fine on 0.94.2 but on 0.95.rc1 > > echo PING|socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket > > is silent yet I can type Tom, are you sure that is the correct path to your clamd.socket? Just curious, because socat if working and responding with PONG fine for me when

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Nathan Brink wrote: > Gary L Burnore wrote: >>> That is correct, no X. >>> >> Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. >> >> Make sure some sort of display variable is set. >> >> (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your >> shell). If

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Nathan Brink wrote: > Gary L Burnore wrote: >>> That is correct, no X. >>> >> Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. >> >> Make sure some sort of display variable is set. >> >> (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your >> shell). If

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Gary L Burnore wrote: >> >> That is correct, no X. >> > > Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. > > Make sure some sort of display variable is set. > > (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your > shell). If xclock or xterm aren't i

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Gary L Burnore
> -Original Message- > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net > [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of > Bill Landry > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 6:51 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9 > > Nathan Brink wrote: > >

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Chris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > > But are Sanesecurity sigs loaded? > If yes, please add all information to > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1370 > > > Best regards, > --Edwin Edwin, pardon the off list reply/question but just had another crash this tim

[Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 OSX 10.5 issues

2009-02-28 Thread Tom Shaw
Some issues: socat ran fine on 0.94.2 but on 0.95.rc1 echo PING|socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket is silent yet I can type socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket and then type PING on the command line and I get PONG I have to admit this confuses me. Then, I ran clamdscan ~/ and it mostly worked except I

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:50:39 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: > > I think no GUI means no X. > > That is correct, no X. > > Bill Sorry, I sort of expected that you'd have an X server running on your local workstation... you don't need one running on the remote machine. Steve -- Steve Holdoway http:

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Nathan Brink wrote: > Steve Holdoway wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 >> Bill Landry wrote: >> >>> I am not running any GUI, > I'm pretty sure this means that he is logging in and running ssh from > vt1, not using X at all. >>> I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and >>> F1

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Steve Holdoway wrote: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 > Bill Landry wrote: > >> I am not running any GUI, I'm pretty sure this means that he is logging in and running ssh from vt1, not using X at all. >> I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and >> F1 is just ignored. Do I need to

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: > I am not running any GUI, I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and > F1 is just ignored. Do I need to be on the server in GUI mode to see > any F1 results? ssh -X server may help ( no I haven't a clue whether it will, but that way a

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 21:18, Bill Landry wrote: >> Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >>> Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> Bill Landry wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it >> should look l

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread shuttlebox
I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11: source='netcode.c' object='netcode.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \ /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I.. -I/opt

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Török Edwin wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've opened an enhancement bug: > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1437 Nice ! 8-) > > >> Either way, nCOMMANDS still remain interesting when using a telnet >> client for, e.g., debug purposes. > > Yes, that is one of the rea

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 22:14, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: >> >>> I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better >>> but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? >>> >>> >> As I said, that is

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: >>> I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better >>> but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? >>> >> As I said, that is a problem if the filename ends with \n, if I

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: >> I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better >> but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? >> > > As I said, that is a problem if the filename ends with \n, if I remove > the \n it will no longer find

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 21:18, Bill Landry wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >>> Bill Landry wrote: >>> Török Edwin wrote: > There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it > should look like (screenshot from an earlier

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Bill Landry wrote: >>> Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 >>> On Fedora

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Bill Landry wrote: >> Török Edwin wrote: >>> There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it >>> should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): >>> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 >> On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Denn

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Landry wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it >> should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): >> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 > > On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and the "F1 - hel

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Török Edwin wrote: > > There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it > should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and the "F1 - help" key appears to do noth

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.95RC1

2009-02-28 Thread sydz
> Nigel Horne wrote: >> Folks, >> 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. This is what is returned on OS X 10.4.11: make check-TESTS *** Unit tests disabled in this build *** Use ./configure --enable-check to enable them SKIP: check_clamav *** Unit tests disabled in this build *** U

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 20:22, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Török Edwin wrote: >> >> >>> Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open >>> to suggestions, if you want some additional features. >>> BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it,

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 20:22, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > > >> Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open >> to suggestions, if you want some additional features. >> BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it >> should automatic

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > > Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open > to suggestions, if you want some additional features. > BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it > should automatically get disabled if ncurses is not available. I vie

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:53, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: >> >>> Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> >>> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect this to be the only surprise.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:52, Chris wrote: > I've seen two crashes in two days right after a freshclam run and > databases are reloaded. Information is below: > > ClamAV 0.94.2/9057 > Mandriva 2009 Free > Mem:774632k total, 696560k used,78072k free,96912k buffers > Swap: 1076312k total, 179

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 Nigel Horne wrote: > 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. Compiled OK on three platforms. Didn't install it on any of them - production machines - but clamdtop complains as expected when run on all of them. :) i686 (dual Pentium III) / RedHat 9 much patche

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: >> Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >>> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect >>> this to be the only surprise. >>> >>> > > I removed the stdint.h include now. > I only tested clamdtop on Sola

[Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Chris
I've seen two crashes in two days right after a freshclam run and databases are reloaded. Information is below: ClamAV 0.94.2/9057 Mandriva 2009 Free Mem:774632k total, 696560k used,78072k free,96912k buffers Swap: 1076312k total, 179420k used, 896892k free, 166164k cached F

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:29, McDonald, Dan wrote: > From: Török Edwin > >> On 2009-02-28 18:08, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> >>> From: Török Edwin >>> On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: >>> >>> > From: Török Edwin > > > dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are n

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin >On 2009-02-28 18:08, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> From: Török Edwin >> On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> From: Török Edwin dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not finding it, since the code is looking for

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface (was clamav 0.95RC1 availabilty)

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:08, McDonald, Dan wrote: > From: Török Edwin > On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: > >>> From: Török Edwin >>> >>> >>> dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not >>> finding it, >>> since the code is looking for /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface (was clamav 0.95RC1 availabilty)

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> From: Török Edwin >> >> >> dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not >> finding it, >> since the code is looking for /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so instead of >> /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6 >> >>

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: > From: Török Edwin > >> On 2009-02-28 17:35, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> >>> From: Török Edwin >>> >>> On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: >

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin >On 2009-02-28 17:35, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> From: Török Edwin >> >>> On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: >>> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: >

Re: [Clamav-users] malformed securiteinfo.hdb

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Tom Shaw wrote: > Bill > > Have you informed SecuriteInfo about the issues with the > securiteinfo.hdb signature database file? Do you know when it might > be fixed? I would like to put 0.95rcx and all unofficials in test but > so far I have had to disable to SecuriteInfo's updates in your scri

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 17:35, McDonald, Dan wrote: > From: Török Edwin > >> On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: >>> >>> On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: >>> >>> This is new. Is

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin >On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: >> >>> On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> >>> This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the >>> requirements? >>> >>> Starting Clam AntiVirus D

Re: [Clamav-users] malformed securiteinfo.hdb

2009-02-28 Thread Tom Shaw
Bill Have you informed SecuriteInfo about the issues with the securiteinfo.hdb signature database file? Do you know when it might be fixed? I would like to put 0.95rcx and all unofficials in test but so far I have had to disable to SecuriteInfo's updates in your script to operate the new clam

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Tom Shaw
At 12:08 PM -0500 2/27/09, Nigel Horne wrote: >Folks, > >0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. > >For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. > >A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved >features is currently in preparation for publication on ww

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better > but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? > As I said, that is a problem if the filename ends with \n, if I remove the \n it will no longer find the file. > I'm trying to fi

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 11:54, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: >> Hello, >> >> At : >> >> https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 >> >> I read : >> >> ** >> In clamd 0.95 it is recommended to prefix all commands with the z >> character, to in

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 11:54, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > Hello, > > At : > > https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 > > I read : > > ** > In clamd 0.95 it is recommended to prefix all commands with the z > character, to indicate that the command will be

[Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello, At : https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 I read : ** In clamd 0.95 it is recommended to prefix all commands with the z character, to indicate that the command will be deliminated by a '\0' character; clamd will then continue reading unt

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > >> On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: >> >>> This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the >>> requirements? >>> >>> Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warni

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect >> this to be the only surprise. >> >> I removed the stdint.h include now. I only tested clamdtop on Solaris 10/x86, I don't have Solaris