On Jan 15, 2008 6:20 AM, Brandon Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use ClamAV to scan computers in the shop I work in and have compared
> it with Norton (not using the --remove argument) and in most cases it
> has had a much higher detection rate, but much slower than Norton (about
> 3x longer)
René Berber wrote:
> Bad advice, how do you know it's a false positive?
In the same we we know that a file is actually infected: we check it.
We don't blindly add all submitted virus as such, nor we blindly remove
signatures based on FP reports.
-aCaB
_
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> aCaB schrieb:
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> where can i find a description to JS.Downloader-37
>>> some customer programmer says this is not really a virus
>>> or a security Problem
>>> if it so
>>> is there a way to make clamscan ignore such type of stuff
>
aCaB wrote:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> where can i find a description to JS.Downloader-37
>> some customer programmer says this is not really a virus
>> or a security Problem
>> if it so
>> is there a way to make clamscan ignore such type of stuff
>
> Report the FP here.
Bad advice
aCaB schrieb:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> where can i find a description to JS.Downloader-37
>> some customer programmer says this is not really a virus
>> or a security Problem
>> if it so
>> is there a way to make clamscan ignore such type of stuff
>
> Report the FP here.
> http://c
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi all,
> where can i find a description to JS.Downloader-37
> some customer programmer says this is not really a virus
> or a security Problem
> if it so
> is there a way to make clamscan ignore such type of stuff
Report the FP here.
http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi
Hi all,
where can i find a description to JS.Downloader-37
some customer programmer says this is not really a virus
or a security Problem
if it so
is there a way to make clamscan ignore such type of stuff
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
__
