On Jan 15, 2008 6:20 AM, Brandon Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use ClamAV to scan computers in the shop I work in and have compared > it with Norton (not using the --remove argument) and in most cases it > has had a much higher detection rate, but much slower than Norton (about > 3x longer). > > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:27 -0600, Matt Forbis wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I am curious as to whether there has been any recent comparison of > ClamAV's virus detection against the wildlist (www.wildlist.org). > Granted, the latest wildlist is from October 2007, but it would be > interesting to see the results as several vendors use their wildlist > detection as a marketing tool (or at least used to). Also, I was wondering > if there was any solid method of actually doing a comparison on my own, as > the wildlist provides only virus names, which do not match the naming > convention used by ClamAV. Any thoughts or ideas would be greatly > appreciated. Thanks! > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Watch "Cause Effect," a show about real people making a real difference. > > http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_watchcause > > _______________________________________________ > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html > > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html >
u should use clamdscan. it is much faster than clamscan. -- zamri Linux System Administrator Kolej ShahPutra Kuantan Pahang Malaysia Tel : 609.573.777.7 ext 119 web : http://muhdzamri.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
