Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Um excuse me ... for your information, my system clock is set correctly.
>> And before you ask - yes, I just double checked it (specially for you).
>>
>> So long ... and thanks for all the fish.
>
> So what the heck time zone are you whining from? It's really tomorrow
>
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Maybe people are looking at the post time of your messages and see you
can't even manage your system clock so aren't surprised you're whining
about configuring something as complex as a fully integrated anti-virus
solution.
Um excuse me ... for your
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Maybe people are looking at the post time of your messages and see you
> can't even manage your system clock so aren't surprised you're whining
> about configuring something as complex as a fully integrated anti-virus
> solution.
Um excuse me ... for your information, my
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:26:34 -0800
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I realize that and I apologize, but I've got a lot going on just now.
There's not a lot to say yet. Solaris 9 in a Sun E250 w/2g ram, 80,000
messages/day per instance, running with a milter (J-c
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Have you patched 8.14.0. I had everything falling over until I did that...
FWIW the problems I had were with 8.13.8
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 948-3162
WestNet Internet Ser
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:26:34 -0800
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I realize that and I apologize, but I've got a lot going on just now.
> There's not a lot to say yet. Solaris 9 in a Sun E250 w/2g ram, 80,000
> messages/day per instance, running with a milter (J-chkmail - beauti
carren stuart wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
ack. Would you rather someone reply and say "wow, that sucks, but i
cant help you"?
Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
problem and request.
Maybe people are looking at the post time of your messages and see you
can't
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
In my case the only difference from every previous build was to enable
experimental. I have just one build script I've used for years.
Try without experimental.
I have a similar set-up (Sun Sparc Ultra 2s, Solaris 8,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> In my case the only difference from every previous build was to enable
> experimental. I have just one build script I've used for years.
Try without experimental.
I have a similar set-up (Sun Sparc Ultra 2s, Solaris 8, gcc 4.1.1)
I was running 0.90
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a
couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without
any error messages.
dp
Yep, I observed the same behavior o
Steve Basford wrote:
>
> carren stuart wrote:
>> Is there some reason why my posts aren't even being acknowledged? I
>> can't believe that nobody knows the answer to my question. This IS the
>> users list and I'm a user, so could somebody PLEASE help me with this.
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I can't
Jim Maul wrote:
> ack. Would you rather someone reply and say "wow, that sucks, but i
> cant help you"?
Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
problem and request.
> You provided no useful information either. Saying:
>
> Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the foll
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 4:07 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
Please recompile without the experimental code and let us know if the problem
still happens.
O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David F. Colwell wrote:
> Is clamd PING still a valid command? Man8 says the reply should be "PONG".
> I get the reply:"Running as user clamav (UID ###, GID ###)". Which is the
> same response with no command.
No, it never has been a command, it is
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
Please recompile without the experimental code and let us know if the problem
still happens.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\.
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:19 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just
Is clamd PING still a valid command? Man8 says the reply should be
"PONG". I get the reply:"Running as user clamav (UID ###, GID ###)".
Which is the same response with no command.
Dave.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wik
On 2/15/07, Török Edvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Follow the instructions here http://www.clamav.net/bugs/ on how to get
a backtrace of clamd. You need to start clamd, then attach gdb to the
running process, and wait for it to crash. Then open a bugreport, and
attach all the info.
Excellent, t
On 2/15/07, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At least some basic information, eg. how you compiled ClamAV, did you use
--enable-experimental, platform details, etc.
I have the same problem on my systems. Or, rather, I have the dying
problem. It could be load related, but I'm not sure.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
> > Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a
couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without
any error messa
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a
> > couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without
> > any error messages.
> >
> > dp
>
> Yep, I observed the same behavior
Did the upgrade on 10.4.8, Intel-based Mac Mini yesterday.
There was a post on this mailing list today about a change you need
to do to the Makefile if you are not running an Intel-based Mac.
I used
./configure --enable-experimental
then make
then sudo make install
Copy the clamd.conf and fr
Hi,
Yesterday I upgraded my mailserver to ClamAV 0.90 (compiled from
source), but tonight the server gave some problems. In the syslog I found:
Feb 15 22:35:29 njord X-Antivirus-FormMailer.Net-1.25-st-qms:
[njord.formmailer.nl117157412980126604] Requeuing: Maximum
time exceeded. Something cannot
I had the same problem.
Fixed it by starting clamd in single user mode.
Ie sudo /path/to/bin/clamd
HTH.
James.
On 16/02/2007, at 2:18 AM, Roger M wrote:
Hello All.
I have installed the latest version of clamav on my redhat server.
I keep getting this error on my server. Can anyone help
E
Dennis Peterson wrote the following on 2/15/2007 1:02 PM -0800:
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensou
There have been compatibility issues for the clamd.conf configuration
file. My configuration files used for 0.8 weren't compatibility with .9
and via-a-versa. I had several boolean options with no arguments, which
was accepted and implied as correct by previous .8 configuration file
comments.
>
> So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
> I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
> problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
>
> What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay where
> you
Mauricio Juarez wrote:
I need to upgrade my CLAMAV to 0.90.
I have a Mac Os X Server with freeSbd, what is the procedure to upgrade
the old version 0.88.5
A very rough guide to getting started (I don't know anything about OSX,
nor am I by any means an expert programmer):
Ensure [gnu] make
>
> It should be present in 0.90 after the first scripted update.
Ok -- I understand now what is happening there.
>
> > >
> >
> > I've not found anything in the docs about this, including in the mirrors
> > how-to. I'd like to continue distributing cvd files internally from a
> > single Interne
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay
On 2/15/07, Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I could use some debug tips. I have clamav installed on CentOS 4.0
along side qmail, spamassassin, simscan and some other software. I've
been running 0.88.7 since it's release with no problems. In fact,
I've been running Clamav sin
Hi all,
I could use some debug tips. I have clamav installed on CentOS 4.0
along side qmail, spamassassin, simscan and some other software. I've
been running 0.88.7 since it's release with no problems. In fact,
I've been running Clamav since pre 0.80 without any issues.
I've compiled clamav w
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay where
you are?
===
carren stuart wrote:
> Is there some reason why my posts aren't even being acknowledged? I
> can't believe that nobody knows the answer to my question. This IS the
> users list and I'm a user, so could somebody PLEASE help me with this.
>
>
Hi,
Sorry I can't really help you... but I did find
carren stuart wrote:
carren stuart wrote:
A while back, I wrote:
I'm running Clamav on DesktopBSD, with Klamav as the front end. Clamav
is working fine and has detected the eicar test files as expected but I
cannot get auto-scanning to work. Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the
following err
carren stuart wrote:
> A while back, I wrote:
>
>
>> I'm running Clamav on DesktopBSD, with Klamav as the front end. Clamav
>> is working fine and has detected the eicar test files as expected but I
>> cannot get auto-scanning to work. Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the
>> following error:
>>
On 2/15/07, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*bump*
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> What is the current significance of the daily.inc directory?
After a scripted update (.cdiff), you will get a daily.inc instead of daily.cvd.
> It is
> present in my rc3 environment but not in 0.90.
It s
*bump*
Dennis Peterson wrote:
What is the current significance of the daily.inc directory? It is
present in my rc3 environment but not in 0.90.
I've not found anything in the docs about this, including in the mirrors
how-to. I'd like to continue distributing cvd files internally from a
sin
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 (11:41 -0500 UTC) Craig Green wrote:
robert delius royar wrote:
The earlier version did not require any thread-related parameters to
configure. Perhaps this problem is a thread-related issue. Note that
sendmail was compiled with threads enabled (nm shows calls to pthread_*
Any recomendations for sucessfully compiling 0.90 using FreeBSD 4.11 with GCC
3.4.6?
So far I tried the following:
First Attempt
$ make clean;./configure CC=gcc34 CFLAGS="-pthread -O3"; make
/usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lpthread
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
Stop in
Hello,
I need to upgrade my CLAMAV to 0.90.
I have a Mac Os X Server with freeSbd, what is the procedure to upgrade
the old version 0.88.5
I downloaded the file clamav-0.90.tar.gz, I know how decompress but Im
not sure how to install. I need stop the mail services or deinstall the
old version
robert delius royar wrote:
The earlier version did not require any thread-related parameters to
configure. Perhaps this problem is a thread-related issue. Note that
sendmail was compiled with threads enabled (nm shows calls to
pthread_* in libmilter.so)
[As an aside, when I did try 0.90 cl
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 (12:44 - UTC) Nigel Horne wrote:
robert delius royar wrote:
System: FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p28 i386
Sendmail: 8.13.8
Milters: spamassassin_milter (C based)
smf-grey
clamav-milter 0.90
With the latest version of clamav-milter, all incoming mail is failing
w
Hello All.
I have installed the latest version of clamav on my redhat server.
I keep getting this error on my server. Can anyone help
ERROR: chdir_inc: Can't create directory main.inc
ERROR: getfile: Can't create new
file ./clamav-d1baccbdbca7c6255cc93d7e80896256
in /usr/local/share/clamav
ERROR
On 15 févr. 07, at 14:38, Mark Allan wrote:
The compile works if you remove the -arch i386 flags from the
Makefiles. I think it appears more than once: in the root Makefile
and twice in the libclamav subdirectory, but I can't remember exactly.
It worked like a charm, thanks!
Best Rega
Trevor Dodds wrote:
I had the same problem running on a Sun Fire X2200 - Solaris 10.
88.7 I have a load avg of around 0.70 with .90 this shot up to 6.0
Cpu usage also on 88.7 is around 20% during large amounts of email with
.90 this shot up to 90%.
I've gone back to 88.7 as I can't afford the per
The compile works if you remove the -arch i386 flags from the
Makefiles. I think it appears more than once: in the root Makefile
and twice in the libclamav subdirectory, but I can't remember exactly.
Mark
On 15 Feb 2007, at 12:36pm, Léonard Bouchet wrote:
Hi all,
I can't make clamav-
Bill Maidment wrote:
I'm now getting errors as follows:
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mdefang-l1DD1Lfh016597/Work/msg-15039-625.pdf: Zip module
failure
ERROR
We get the equivalent error (calling clamd from exim) just once at the same
time every day. On investigation, it turned out to be a newsletter
Hi all,
I can't make clamav-0.9 to compile on my mac os x 10.3.9 server
machine. Here is the error I get:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libclamav.la
-rpath /usr/lib -version-info 1:40:0 -no-undefined matcher-ac.lo
matcher-bm.lo matcher-ncore.lo matcher.lo md5.lo
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:49:17PM +0100, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Dear readers,
>
> I've used clamav for some time now, and I'm very hapy with it.Yesterday
> I tried to upgrade to 0.90, but after upgrading mimedefang starts
> complaining about "Problem running virus-scanner", so I downgraded to
> 0
Stephen Gran wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your answer. What information do you require?
>
> Log messages would be a good start, although any other diagnostic
> information you can supply would also be helpful. I don't use
> mimedefang myself, but often you can cut and paste error messages in
> full
Why is the version of the milter this:
#define CM_VERSION "devel-120207"
--
Ken Jones
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:39:30PM +, Stuart Rowan said:
> Really for the attention of Stephen Gran but I thought this might be useful
> for the archives ...
>
> Any plans to get 0.90 into volatile.debian.net for sarge and/or etch?
Yes. I have to work out a way to do it in such a way that i
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:24:51PM +0100, Peter Boosten said:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:49:17PM +0100, Peter Boosten said:
> >> Dear readers,
> >>
> >> I've used clamav for some time now, and I'm very hapy with it.Yesterday
> >> I tried to upgrade to 0.90, but after upgra
robert delius royar wrote:
System: FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p28 i386
Sendmail: 8.13.8
Milters: spamassassin_milter (C based)
smf-grey
clamav-milter 0.90
With the latest version of clamav-milter, all incoming mail is failing
with a temp fail 451 error. In the log files I see
Mil
Really for the attention of Stephen Gran but I thought this might be useful
for the archives ...
Any plans to get 0.90 into volatile.debian.net for sarge and/or etch?
Cheers,
Stu.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clama
Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:49:17PM +0100, Peter Boosten said:
>> Dear readers,
>>
>> I've used clamav for some time now, and I'm very hapy with it.Yesterday
>> I tried to upgrade to 0.90, but after upgrading mimedefang starts
>> complaining about "Problem running virus-scanner
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:49:17PM +0100, Peter Boosten said:
> Dear readers,
>
> I've used clamav for some time now, and I'm very hapy with it.Yesterday
> I tried to upgrade to 0.90, but after upgrading mimedefang starts
> complaining about "Problem running virus-scanner", so I downgraded to
> 0.
Dear readers,
I've used clamav for some time now, and I'm very hapy with it.Yesterday
I tried to upgrade to 0.90, but after upgrading mimedefang starts
complaining about "Problem running virus-scanner", so I downgraded to
0.88.7 again (and everthing start working again).
My setup:
Sendmail
Mimed
System: FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p28 i386
Sendmail: 8.13.8
Milters: spamassassin_milter (C based)
smf-grey
clamav-milter 0.90
With the latest version of clamav-milter, all incoming mail is failing
with a temp fail 451 error. In the log files I see
Milter (clmilter): timeout befo
Richard Feldmann wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Been digging in this for a while and I can't get mod_clamav
> to work with apache. It looks like the cl_perror function
> which was removed from clamav in November 2005 is still used
> by mod_clamav (version 0.21 is the latest I found), and
> apache barfs on
63 matches
Mail list logo
