Hi,
Is cl_scanfile API provided by LibClamAV ( Clam AntiVirus 0.88.3 user
manual) a blocking call ?
Does LibClamAV support asynchronous scanning of files ? If so, which
scan option/API to be used for this ?
Please suggest.
thanks,
babu
___
http:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:05 PM, David McKenzie wrote:
gcc -shared matcher-ac.lo matcher-bm.lo matcher.lo md5.lo others.lo
readdb.lo cvd.lo dsig.lo str.lo scanners.lo filetypes.lo unrarlib.lo
zzip-dir.lo zzip-err.lo zzip-file.lo zzip-info.lo zzip-io.lo
zzip-stat.lo zzip-zip.lo strc.lo blob.lo mbox.l
Linux 2.6.9-22.EC alpha alpha
zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
glibc-2.3.4-2.19axp
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.19axp
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19axp
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.19axp
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.98axp.EL
libcap-1.10-20
libcap-devel-1.10-20
libc-client-2002e-14
libcroco-0.6.0-4
gcc -shared matcher-ac.lo matcher-bm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert S wrote:
[snip]
> Strange . . it works fine with the US mirror. I tried a few others
> (eg. UK, NZ) previously but they didn't work. The only other thing I
> changed was my kernel configuration because dnsmasq was complaining
> ("warning: set
Just to throw my 2 cents (US) in. I have similar problems on an intermittent
basis. Here is an extract from my clam-update.log from last evening. Worked
fine at 20:35, bombed at 21:35, then worked again at 22:35. This has been
happening every couple of days for the 2 weeks or so, which is roughly
c
Hi All,
We run ClamAV 0.88.4 under FreeBSD - we just recently moved from 0.88.1 (a
little old) to 0.88.4, and have noticed that the memory consumption of the
clamd process has gone through the roof.
I saw a couple of fairly recent posts on a similar thread - so we've got
fairly 'lax' proce
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Please read http://www.clamav.net/binary.html#pagestart
If you are running clamav on a productive machine, you shouldn't mix
stable and testing unless you REALLY know what you are doing.
Use volatile.debian.net for that purpose. The current release policy of
Debian's
Version 39 is not the current version, look at the date June 9, the current is
version 40 built August 16 (just a day before you found the problem, so that's
it).
Please report your region mirror to Luca Gibelli (luca AT clamav DOT net), in
the meantime you could use another mirror, i.e. db.us.c
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:09:36AM +0200, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have that particular list in my source file. But i've getting
> updates prior to this one before through "testing" :
Please read http://www.clamav.net/binary.html#pagestart
>
> # apt-cache policy
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/debian-volatile-announce-2006/msg00011.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy clamav
clamav:
Installed: 0.88.4-0volatile1
Candidate: 0.88.4-0volatile1
Version Table:
*** 0.88.4-0volatile1 0
500 ht
Hi,
I am using ClamAV with amavisd-new to scan emails for viruses, and the
performance wasn't that good.
I played a little with amavisd.conf file and found the
"bypass_decode_parts" option, this is what the option suppose to do:
"set $bypass_decode_parts to true if you only do spam scanni
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:17:16AM +0200, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it just me, or is 0.88.4 for Debian not yet available through apt?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/debian-volatile-announce-2006/msg00011.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache pol
Hi,
Is it just me, or is 0.88.4 for Debian not yet available through apt?
Thanks in advance.
/ Martin
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
13 matches
Mail list logo
