On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Smith, Duane E (GE Consumer & Industrial) wrote:
When I try to specify multiple --exclude-dir clamscan only uses the last one.
clamscan --help says this:
--exclude-dir=REGEX Don't scan directories matching
So, try something like this instead:
clamsc
When I try to specify multiple --exclude-dir clamscan only uses the last one.
Examples below. Need a way to exclude both dir1 and dir2
clamscan -r
/root/clamtest/dir1/dir1a/test.file: Empty file
/root/clamtest/dir1/test.file: Empty file
/root/clamtest/dir2/test.file: Empty file
/root/clamtest/
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Smith, Duane E (GE Consumer & Industrial) wrote:
I need to exclude several directories when I scan the complete system.
How do I specify multiple directories with the --exclude-dir option
man clamscan says:
--exclude=PATT, --exclude-dir=PATT
Don't scan file/director
I need to exclude several directories when I scan the complete system. How do
I specify multiple directories with the --exclude-dir option
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
* jef moskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 17:27]: wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > Where is the new version of zlib, if you might know?
>
> I'm not sure that it's a new version of zlib, exactly, especially since
> the problem and the f
jef moskot wrote:
> I'm not sure that it's a new version of zlib, exactly, especially since
> the problem and the fix seem to be OS-specific.
>
> If you have FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4, there are explicit instructions for what
> to do here:
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-0
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Where is the new version of zlib, if you might know?
I'm not sure that it's a new version of zlib, exactly, especially since
the problem and the fix seem to be OS-specific.
If you have FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4, there are explicit instructions for what
to
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 17:10]: wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
What I wrote and what you wrote are different, hence different results.
You are correct. You wrote:
http://www.gzip.org/
However, The last modifie
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 10:01 -0400, jef moskot wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> > www.zlib.net is still showing 1.2.2 from Oct 3 2004 as the latest version.
> > Where is the version that was released yesterday ?
>
> It affects FreeBSD 5.4 and 5.4, so if you have 4.x, yo
* Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 17:10]: wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
>
> > What I wrote and what you wrote are different, hence different results.
>
> You are correct. You wrote:
>
> > http://www.gzip.org/
>
>
* jef moskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 17:08]: wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, jef moskot wrote:
> > It affects FreeBSD 5.4 and 5.4...
>
> Oops, that's 5.3 and 5.4. Sorry about that.
Jeff,
Where is the new version of zlib, if you might know?
-Wash
http
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, jef moskot wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> > www.zlib.net is still showing 1.2.2 from Oct 3 2004 as the latest version.
> > Where is the version that was released yesterday ?
>
> It affects FreeBSD 5.4 and 5.4, so if you have 4.x, you might not ha
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
> What I wrote and what you wrote are different, hence different results.
You are correct. You wrote:
> http://www.gzip.org/
However, The last modified date of the www.gzip.org page is July 27, 2003.
There is no mention of a new version 'yesterday' (July 6 2005)
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, jef moskot wrote:
> It affects FreeBSD 5.4 and 5.4...
Oops, that's 5.3 and 5.4. Sorry about that.
Jeffrey Moskot
System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> www.zlib.net is still showing 1.2.2 from Oct 3 2004 as the latest version.
> Where is the version that was released yesterday ?
It affects FreeBSD 5.4 and 5.4, so if you have 4.x, you might not have
noticed. Full details here:
ftp://ftp.freebsd
* Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 16:35]: wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 09:28 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> >
> > > You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
> > > one
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 09:48 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
>
> > http://www.gzip.org/
>
> Thanks, but http://www.gzip.org/zlib/ is also showing 1.2.2 from 10/3/2004
> as the current version.
What I wrote and what you wrote are different, hence differen
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
> http://www.gzip.org/
Thanks, but http://www.gzip.org/zlib/ is also showing 1.2.2 from 10/3/2004
as the current version.
(www.zlib.net is listed here as the US mirror for www.gzip.org/zlib/ )
-Chris
==
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 09:28 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
>
> > You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
> > one. A new version was released yesterday that fixed another crash.
>
> www.zlib.net is still showing 1
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 at 16:18:15 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
[...]
> 4. Make an archive of both and send it to the developers. They have a
>separate list, but they do lurk here as well so you can place the
>files on a publicly accessible site somewhere and give them the link
>to do
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
> one. A new version was released yesterday that fixed another crash.
www.zlib.net is still showing 1.2.2 from Oct 3 2004 as the latest version.
Where is the version that was rel
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 16:04]: wrote:
> > He's lied to you. Period.
>
> Nope, after spying on the users mailbox the mail that was "fixed"
> [-- Attachment #2: Focus on Storage.doc --]
> [-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Si
> He's lied to you. Period.
Nope, after spying on the users mailbox the mail that was "fixed"
[-- Attachment #2: Focus on Storage.doc --]
[-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 39K --]
> However, you and him need to reproduce the problem and document it
> properly then send the det
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 15:13]: wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 13:21 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > > head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h
> > >
> > > /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose
> >
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 15:22]: wrote:
> Sorry this must be getting annoying.
>
> The "Fixed" email has now gone through without any problem. This means
> that what ever was in the header of the "messy" email had the ablility
> to shu
Sorry this must be getting annoying.
The "Fixed" email has now gone through without any problem. This means
that what ever was in the header of the "messy" email had the ablility
to shutdown clamd. I would chalk this one up as a plausible DOS attack
the fact that I cannot provide you with a copy
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 13:21 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h
> >
> > /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose
> compression library
> > version 1.1.3, July 9th, 1998
>
> You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
> one.
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 14:36]: wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> > shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> > running clamav 0.85 with out
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 13:21 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h
>
> /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose compression library
> version 1.1.3, July 9th, 1998
You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
one. A new version was
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:50 -0700, Johnny Stork wrote:
> Cant seem to find any binaries for rhel4? I need clamavm clamav-db,
> clam-milter and clamd. Any suggestions?
Grab the SRPM for 0.86, or 0.85, or...; install it on a build-box.
Download the source distribution from clamav.net and put it in
> head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h
/* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose compression library
version 1.1.3, July 9th, 1998
David Peall :: Systems Administrator
e-Schools' Network :: http://www.esn.org.za/
Phone +27 (021) 674-9140
_
> Hi All
>
> I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
> upgraded to 0.86 with out any improvement. These are mx backups for
> each
> Doing a strings on that file should pull out the version number -
> there's probably a better way, but FreeBSD isn't my main platform.
deflate 1.1.3 Copyright 1995-1998 Jean-loup Gailly
inflate 1.1.3 Copyright 1995-1998 Mark Adler
David Peall :: Systems Administrator
e-Schools' Network :: http:
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 13:45]: wrote:
> > What version of zlib do you have?
>
> perl-5.8.6_2
> bsdpan-IO-Zlib-1.04
> p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34
What Trog wanted is not what you have given.
Try this command and post the output:
head -n 2 /usr/src/lib/l
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:43 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > perl-5.8.6_2
> > > bsdpan-IO-Zlib-1.04
> > > p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34
> >
> > Not those, it may be called libz
>
> This one ?
> zziplib-0.10.82 A library to provide transparent read access to
> zipped file
On my old FreeBSD system it
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:34 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > What version of zlib do you have?
> >
> > perl-5.8.6_2
> > bsdpan-IO-Zlib-1.04
> > p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34
>
> Not those, it may be called libz
Ah from /usr/ports/security/clamav/Makefile
RUN_DEPENDS=lha:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/lha
> > perl-5.8.6_2
> > bsdpan-IO-Zlib-1.04
> > p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34
>
> Not those, it may be called libz
This one ?
zziplib-0.10.82 A library to provide transparent read access to
zipped file
David Peall :: Systems Administrator
e-Schools' Network :: http://www.esn.org.za/
Phone +27 (021) 6
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:34 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > What version of zlib do you have?
>
> perl-5.8.6_2
> bsdpan-IO-Zlib-1.04
> p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34
Not those, it may be called libz
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
> What version of zlib do you have?
perl-5.8.6_2
bsdpan-IO-Zlib-1.04
p5-Compress-Zlib-1.34
David Peall :: Systems Administrator
e-Schools' Network :: http://www.esn.org.za/
Phone +27 (021) 674-9140
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:13 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> > > shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> > > running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
> > > upgraded to 0.86
* David Peall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050707 13:07]: wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago.
> > I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> > shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> > running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
> > upgraded to 0.86 with out any improvement.
Where 0.85 is 0.85.1 and 0.86 is 0
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:05 +0200, David Peall wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
> shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
> running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
> upgraded to 0.86 with
Hi All
I have two servers both FreeBSD and on both of them clamd just keeps
shutting down. The problem has only started recently they have been
running clamav 0.85 with out problems until two days ago. I have
upgraded to 0.86 with out any improvement. These are mx backups for
each other and not
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 12:20 -0400, Mitch wrote:
>
> What effect will that have not building it with libcurl?
You won't be able to use MailFollowURLs which is disabled by default.
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:15:02 +0200, Nicki de Wet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I run a test against a "bounce" email containing an email with a
> suspicious attachment, it does not find it. When I submit the attached email
> with the attachment, the submission page says the following:
46 matches
Mail list logo
