Re: [Clamav-users] Mydoom.M

2004-07-31 Thread Roman Suzi
Hi all, I was pretty happy with clamav 0.51 + some script which decoded base64 (I was feeding data to stdin) until Mydoom.M. I was very surprised that ald db format is no longer available from September (IIRC), so update was a must anyway. New clamav runs much faster, but I wonder how much trus

Re: [Clamav-users] success report on 0.75.1

2004-07-31 Thread Todd Lyons
Robert Blayzor wanted us to know: >>USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND >>clamav5089 0.1 0.6 31736 14288 ? SJul30 2:44 clamd >>clamav3897 0.2 1.3 32760 14168 ? SJul30 3:31 clamd >>clamav 30246 0.2 2.9 57260 30332 ? S

Re: [Clamav-users] success report on 0.75.1

2004-07-31 Thread Robert Blayzor
Todd Lyons wrote: Mine however are some strange sizes. Tell me what you think of this: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND clamav5089 0.1 0.6 31736 14288 ? SJul30 2:44 clamd clamav3897 0.2 1.3 32760 14168 ? SJul30 3:31 clamd cl

Re: [Clamav-users] success report on 0.75.1

2004-07-31 Thread Todd Lyons
Christopher McCrory wanted us to know: >FWIW , I updated to 0.75.1 today and it is working well. broken MIME I'm reporting success for the same upgrade. I've gotten 24 hours of troublefree operation, which is a good sign since one of my machines is notoriously picky about clamd. >Mydoom.M are

Re: [Clamav-users] Mydoom.M

2004-07-31 Thread Arthur Kerpician
Daniel J McDonald wrote: On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 14:27, Arthur Kerpician wrote: Hi, 1. I'm running ClamAV-0.73 on RH9 machine (qmail) and made all the updates, 0.73 doesn't support mangled MIME encoding. That was added in 0.75. You probably want to upgrade to 0.75.1 at this point. I di