Todd Lyons wrote:
Mine however are some strange sizes. Tell me what you think of this:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND clamav 5089 0.1 0.6 31736 14288 ? S Jul30 2:44 clamd clamav 3897 0.2 1.3 32760 14168 ? S Jul30 3:31 clamd clamav 30246 0.2 2.9 57260 30332 ? S Jul30 5:00 clamd
The first line is mx1, a P3 700 with 2 Gigs RAM. The second line is mx2, a dual P3 700 with 1 Gig RAM. The third line is mx3, a P3 600 with 1 Gig RAM.
Are these all equal cost MX servers or is mx3 the highest cost server? If the latter higher cost MX servers tend to get the crap kicked out of them a lot more than primary servers because it was one of the ways around Postini in the early days and in fact is a way around some RBL implementations if they can sneak them by on the higher order MX servers. It could very well be the stack is bloated up due to the higher amount of scanning happening on the MX server. Just a guess though.
-- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: http://www.inoc.net/~dev/ Key fingerprint = 1E02 DABE F989 BC03 3DF5 0E93 8D02 9D0B CB1A A7B0
If you unplug it fast enough, anything is hot swappable!
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
