@@ -3726,6 +3726,16 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
AlignmentCI, OffsetValue);
return RValue::get(PtrValue);
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_assume_dereferenceable: {
+const Expr *Ptr = E-
@@ -2761,6 +2761,41 @@ etc.).
Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_assume_separate_storage)``.
+``__builtin_assume_dereferenceable``
+-
+
+``__builtin_assume_derefernceable`` is used to provide the optimizer with the
+know
@@ -2761,6 +2761,41 @@ etc.).
Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_assume_separate_storage)``.
+``__builtin_assume_dereferenceable``
+-
+
+``__builtin_assume_derefernceable`` is used to provide the optimizer with the
+know
@@ -213,6 +215,15 @@ ANALYZER_OPTION(
"400'000 should on average make Z3 queries run for up to 100ms on modern "
"hardware. Set 0 for unlimited.", 0)
+ANALYZER_OPTION(
+unsigned, Z3CrosscheckRetriesOnTimeout,
+"crosscheck-with-z3-retries-on-timeout",
+"Set
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: David Green
Date: 2025-01-06T16:26:41Z
New Revision: ca603d2536f039194141bf3a01e9ee7f60e37406
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ca603d2536f039194141bf3a01e9ee7f60e37406
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ca603d2536f039194141bf3a01e9ee7f60e37406.diff
LOG: [
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119423
>From 3f007d702922db63e128e3c0f72dff2f600e0879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:41:07 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang] Fix sub-integer
__builtin_elementwise_(add|sub
@@ -649,7 +649,9 @@ Unless specified otherwise operation(±0) = ±0 and
operation(±infinity) = ±in
The integer elementwise intrinsics, including
``__builtin_elementwise_popcount``,
``__builtin_elementwise_bitreverse``, ``__builtin_elementwise_add_sat``,
-``__builtin_elementwis
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Thanks, the patch looks great
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4593,9 +4593,14 @@ class FunctionType : public Type {
SME_ZT0Shift = 5,
SME_ZT0Mask = 0b111 << SME_ZT0Shift,
+// A bit to tell whether a function is agnostic about sme ZA state.
+SME_AgnosticZAStateShift = 8,
+SME_AgnosticZAStateMask = 1 << SME_Agnostic
@@ -7745,6 +7746,38 @@ static bool checkMutualExclusion(TypeProcessingState
&state,
return true;
}
+static bool handleArmAgnosticAttribute(Sema &S,
+ FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo &EPI,
+ ParsedAt
@@ -7559,6 +7559,26 @@ The attributes ``__arm_in(S)``, ``__arm_out(S)``,
``__arm_inout(S)`` and
}];
}
+def ArmAgnosticDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatArmSmeAttributes;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``__arm_agnostic`` keyword applies to prototyped function types an
@@ -3835,6 +3835,9 @@ def err_sme_unimplemented_za_save_restore : Error<
"call to a function that shares state other than 'za' from a "
"function that has live 'za' state requires a spill/fill of ZA, which is not
yet "
"implemented">;
+def err_sme_unimplemented_agnostic_
@@ -7559,6 +7559,26 @@ The attributes ``__arm_in(S)``, ``__arm_out(S)``,
``__arm_inout(S)`` and
}];
}
+def ArmAgnosticDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatArmSmeAttributes;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``__arm_agnostic`` keyword applies to prototyped function types an
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121598
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121598
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
>From f7041f5f6f0127f335bedf081f648e769007a827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:35:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Retry UNDEF Z3 queries at most
"crosscheck-with
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón (alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource)
Changes
...when there are invalid constraints.
When attaching a `TypeConstraint`, in case of error, the trailing pointer that
is supposed to point
@@ -21,9 +21,12 @@ ABIArgInfo DefaultABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty)
const {
// Records with non-trivial destructors/copy-constructors should not be
// passed by value.
if (CGCXXABI::RecordArgABI RAA = getRecordArgABI(Ty, getCXXABI()))
- return getN
https://github.com/Pierre-vh approved this pull request.
Ah, that makes sense. It's surprising it wasn't like that in the first place
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120095
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
arsenm wrote:
> Ah, that makes sense. It's surprising it wasn't like that in the first place
But can we now get rid of the -one-as sync scopes and replace them with MMRAs?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120095
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
Endilll wrote:
CWG2770 is still open (`clang/www/make_cxx_dr_s
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-debian-cpp20`
running on `clang-debian-cpp20` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/108/builds/7783
Here is the r
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119033
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T17:30:39+03:00
New Revision: b79d3b9519620e34f0e223fdb4a6731db6cda88f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b79d3b9519620e34f0e223fdb4a6731db6cda88f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b79d3b9519620e34f0e223fdb4a6731db6cda88f.
Pierre-vh wrote:
> > Ah, that makes sense. It's surprising it wasn't like that in the first place
>
> But can we now get rid of the -one-as sync scopes and replace them with MMRAs?
MMRAs are droppable so not currently suited to replace syncscopes like that,
but it's a goal.
As part of the Vul
https://github.com/ccotter updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114244
>From fd914cc82688b122654d2d7ada72007541b197c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Cotter
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:54:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Add bugprone-sprintf-overlap
---
.../bugprone/BugproneTid
@@ -1389,6 +1389,68 @@ Query for this attribute with
``__has_attribute(overloadable)``.
}];
}
+def OwnershipDocs : Documentation {
+ let Heading = "ownership_holds, ownership_returns, ownership_takes (Clang "
+"Static Analyzer)";
+ let Category = DocCatFun
=?utf-8?q?André?= Brand
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
erichkeane wrote:
> > Thanks for the PR. Can you update the commit message to be more descriptive?
> > I'm not sure the fix is sufficient.
> > I think most of the checks done in `ActOnEnumBody` should be (re) performed
> > on instantiation.
> >
https://github.com/necto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121781
>From 08b838adf275f1e0eaf2ab3e3d4b2b6d89bf4ed6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arseniy Zaostrovnykh
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 14:37:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [NFC] Replace getRegionValueSymbol with
get
This sho
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
zyn0217 wrote:
Thanks for the post cleanup! Just learned how t
https://github.com/changkhothuychung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120920
error: too big or took too long to generate
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/farzonl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121598
>From 74f86806bbdf1397973f70043ce0856bc6a4a4a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Farzon Lotfi
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 14:52:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SPIRV] Add Target Builtins using Distance ext as an
example
farzonl wrote:
@Endilll It looks like you are the code owner for
`/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h` Are you happy with these changes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121598
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121768
From da2bbf99b8430d8b6aa6bf7969c9825b4d94219b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:36:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121777
>From 00772b871de43a5e30aca2a65a89675117cafbf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kerry McLaughlin
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:22:02 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64][SME] Add diagnostics to
CheckConstexpr
@@ -1235,15 +1235,24 @@ bool Sema::AttachTypeConstraint(AutoTypeLoc TL,
<< NewConstrainedParm->getTypeSourceInfo()
->getTypeLoc()
.getSourceRange();
+NewConstrainedParm->setPlaceholderTypeConstraint(
+RecoveryExpr::Create(Contex
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
One of our contributors got confused by the behavior of the script when they
incorrectly specified the status of a CWG issue
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102857/files#r1904264872), and th
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
Date: 2025-01-06T21:34:11+05:30
New Revision: df67e37e37a7862e1e67f52e01f0c9a019477930
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df67e37e37a7862e1e67f52e01f0c9a019477930
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df67e37e37a7862e1e67f52e01f0c9a01947793
https://github.com/ssahasra closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121785
One of our contributors got confused by the behavior of the script when they
incorrectly specified the status of a CWG issue
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102857/files#r1904264872), and this
is an
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T20:05:17+04:00
New Revision: 10fb5d2b4be54c779eda80b65a737b9dae2d959b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10fb5d2b4be54c779eda80b65a737b9dae2d959b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10fb5d2b4be54c779eda80b65a737b9dae2d959b.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121687
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -649,7 +649,9 @@ Unless specified otherwise operation(±0) = ±0 and
operation(±infinity) = ±in
The integer elementwise intrinsics, including
``__builtin_elementwise_popcount``,
``__builtin_elementwise_bitreverse``, ``__builtin_elementwise_add_sat``,
-``__builtin_elementwis
DKLoehr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-arm
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kerry McLaughlin (kmclaughlin-arm)
Changes
CheckFunctionDeclaration emits diagnostics if any SME attributes are used
by a function definition without the required +sme or
https://github.com/kmclaughlin-arm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121788
This adds support for parsing the attribute and codegen to map it to
"aarch64_za_state_agnostic" LLVM IR attribute.
This attribute is described in the Arm C Language Extensions (ACLE) document:
https:/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Sander de Smalen (sdesmalen-arm)
Changes
This adds support for parsing the attribute and codegen to map it to
"aarch64_za_state_agnostic" LLVM IR attribute.
This attribute is described in the Arm C Langu
https://github.com/fhahn created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121789
This patch adds a new __builtin_assume_dereferenceable to encode
dereferenceability of a pointer using llvm.assume with an operand bundle.
For now the builtin only accepts constant sizes, I am planning to drop th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Florian Hahn (fhahn)
Changes
This patch adds a new __builtin_assume_dereferenceable to encode
dereferenceability of a pointer using llvm.assume with an operand bundle.
For now the builtin only accepts co
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/12282
Here
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/inbelic ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Finn Plummer (inbelic)
Changes
```
- Implement the ParseRootParameter methods in ParseHLSLRootSignature
- Define the in-memory represenation of the various RootParameters and adds
it to the RootElement structure
- Add testing of valid input
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104661
>From 76db8c65328736fae39bd6f7585f8274e9f34143 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 23:50:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Remove 3-element vector load and store special
handling
https://github.com/amane-ame updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119563
From 659eda3ec76b63418f8b621b004728d9d7bf26ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amane-ame
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:17:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang] Fix crashes when passing VLA to va_arg
---
clang/li
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot8` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/3918
Here is the r
carlosgalvezp wrote:
> Is this still worth adding here? I didn't see an equivalent in clang's -Wall.
Indeed Clang is missing this check in -Wall. For parity with GCC it probably
makes sense to add it to -Wall as well instead of being a clang-tidy check.
What do you think @AaronBallman ?
https
@@ -1921,6 +1921,22 @@ static bool EvaluateFixedPointOrInteger(const Expr *E,
APFixedPoint &Result,
static bool EvaluateFixedPoint(const Expr *E, APFixedPoint &Result,
EvalInfo &Info);
+/// Support for atomic builtins
tbaederr w
@@ -1921,6 +1921,22 @@ static bool EvaluateFixedPointOrInteger(const Expr *E,
APFixedPoint &Result,
static bool EvaluateFixedPoint(const Expr *E, APFixedPoint &Result,
EvalInfo &Info);
+/// Support for atomic builtins
+static bool EvaluateAtomic
@@ -17893,4 +17996,441 @@ std::optional
EvaluateBuiltinIsWithinLifetime(IntExprEvaluator &IEE,
IsWithinLifetimeHandler handler{Info};
return findSubobject(Info, E, CO, Val.getLValueDesignator(), handler);
}
+
} // namespace
+
+static bool EvaluateAtomicOrder(const AtomicE
RossComputerGuy wrote:
> That said, I tend to agree with the review at [#121123
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121123#discussion_r1900548165)
> that this doesn't seem like the right approach.
Yeah I agree too, I'm not sure what the right approach is but that's one of th
Author: Ian Anderson
Date: 2025-01-06T21:33:51-08:00
New Revision: 653a54727eaa18c43447ad686c987db67f1dda74
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/653a54727eaa18c43447ad686c987db67f1dda74
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/653a54727eaa18c43447ad686c987db67f1dda74.diff
steakhal wrote:
I find this really unfortunate that I had to patch the other places where we
initialize the AnalyzerOptions table.
Just because the we can't assign the default value to the given option. This
makes me reconsider my approach because it WILL break all downstream users.
Any suggest
@@ -427,42 +423,53 @@ class ParentMapContext::ParentMap::ASTVisitor
return Result;
}
- bool TraverseDecl(Decl *DeclNode) {
+ bool TraverseDecl(Decl *DeclNode) override {
return TraverseNode(
-DeclNode, DeclNode, [&] { return VisitorBase::TraverseDecl(DeclN
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120507
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang,llvm` at
step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/10589
Here is the rele
https://github.com/amane-ame updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119563
From 659eda3ec76b63418f8b621b004728d9d7bf26ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amane-ame
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:17:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang] Fix crashes when passing VLA to va_arg
---
clang/li
https://github.com/ssahasra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121736
>From 2cae10eb0b1e94729c26299af018216e729607de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:30:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] explicitly check if ParentMap contains key
T
https://github.com/ssahasra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121736
>From 2cae10eb0b1e94729c26299af018216e729607de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:30:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] explicitly check if ParentMap contains key
T
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void BuildParentMap(MapTy& M, Stmt* S,
// The right thing to do is to give the OpaqueValueExpr its syntactic
// parent, then not reassign that when traversing the semantic expressions.
OpaqueValueExpr *OVE = cast(S);
-if (OVMode == OV_Tr
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@ static void BuildParentMap(MapTy& M, Stmt* S,
case Stmt::PseudoObjectExprClass: {
PseudoObjectExpr *POE = cast(S);
-if (OVMode == OV_Opaque && M[POE->getSyntacticForm()])
+if (OVMode == OV_Opaque && M.contains(POE->getSyntacticForm()))
---
shiltian wrote:
ping @arsenm @topperc
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1215
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Thanks for the review! Would you mind doing the merge? I do not
Author: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
Date: 2025-01-06T18:52:11+08:00
New Revision: a13bcf3ced35b0df89ac13670690b4482052e47f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a13bcf3ced35b0df89ac13670690b4482052e47f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a13bcf3ced35b0df89ac13670690b448205
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Once the premerge bots are happy, we can merge this. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
https://github.com/Discookie updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117165
>From e90ab99dde0945d103959fa73ea2d31852f753e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktor
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 14:33:24 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-tidy] Add C++ member function support to
user-defined bug
@@ -3013,6 +3013,7 @@ enum CXCallingConv {
CXCallingConv_M68kRTD = 19,
CXCallingConv_PreserveNone = 20,
CXCallingConv_RISCVVectorCall = 21,
+ CXCallingConv_RISCVVLSCall = 22,
4vtomat wrote:
I see, let me change it to this approach~
https://github.com/l
Discookie wrote:
Removed ``ShowFullyQualifiedNames`` for this PR, once this PR is in I'll open a
separate one for it.
Added an example for matching all templates to the docs as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117165
___
cfe-commits mai
https://github.com/Keenuts approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hchandel created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121752
The Qualcomm uC Xqcicm extension adds 13 conditional move instructions.
The current spec can be found at:
https://github.com/quic/riscv-unified-db/releases/latest
This patch adds assembler only support.
>From
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: quic_hchandel (hchandel)
Changes
The Qualcomm uC Xqcicm extension adds 13 conditional move instructions.
The current spec can be found at:
https://github.com/quic/riscv-unified-db/releases/latest
This p
https://github.com/lenary approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Benjamin Maxwell
Date: 2025-01-06T11:07:25Z
New Revision: e4e2f5369301d0965343406089d63ddfba4c08d0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e4e2f5369301d0965343406089d63ddfba4c08d0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e4e2f5369301d0965343406089d63ddfba4c08d0.diff
L
https://github.com/MacDue closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114086
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6092,12 +6092,14 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclUpdatesBlocks(ASTContext
&Context,
// An updated body is emitted last, so that the reader doesn't need
// to skip over the lazy body to reach statements for other records.
- if (Kind == UPD_CXX_ADDED_FUNCTION_D
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You c
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM now.
We can land this after you fix the formatting issue.
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121550
___
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -7230,6 +7230,9 @@ void ASTWriter::CompletedImplicitDefinition(const
FunctionDecl *D) {
if (!D->is
jijjijj wrote:
@ChuanqiXu9 here's the PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121739
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118537
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
@@ -7230,6 +7230,9 @@ void ASTWriter::CompletedImplicitDefinition(const
FunctionDecl *D) {
if (!D->isFromASTFile())
return; // Declaration not imported from PCH.
+ if (!D->doesThisDeclarationHaveABody())
+return; // The function definition may not have a body due t
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121550
From fe4adf2f95aeb72436eead3567767c8c539811c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:58:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [c
401 - 500 of 572 matches
Mail list logo
