Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T20:05:17+04:00
New Revision: 10fb5d2b4be54c779eda80b65a737b9dae2d959b

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10fb5d2b4be54c779eda80b65a737b9dae2d959b
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10fb5d2b4be54c779eda80b65a737b9dae2d959b.diff

LOG: [clang] Add test for CWG203 "Type of address-of-member expression" 
(#121687)

This patch adds test for
[CWG203](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/203.html). Author was
asking to change the type of pointer-to-member expression to be closer
to how it's written as opposed to where the resulting member belongs to,
but was turned down due to backwards compatibility concerns, so we're
testing the status quo.

There are a total of 6 examples in the filing, so I decided to just
throw all of them into the test. I had to turn example 2 into
`constexpr` test that unfortunately requires C++20. Outcomes in example
5 that Tomasz expected are not in line with implementation behavior and
my reading of the Standard. I think he got confused by the fact that
unlike regular pointers, pointers-to-members can be implicitly
_downcasted_, but not upcasted. I left comments in the example.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg2xx.cpp
    clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg2xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg2xx.cpp
index dde3369b41f778..0d644bae783828 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg2xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg2xx.cpp
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,cxx98-14,cxx98-17 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17,cxx98-17 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17,since-cxx20 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17,since-cxx20 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s 
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17,since-cxx20 -fexceptions 
-fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
 
 // FIXME: diagnostic above is emitted only on Windows platforms
 // PR13819 -- __SIZE_TYPE__ is incompatible.
@@ -42,6 +42,141 @@ namespace cwg202 { // cwg202: 3.1
   template struct X<f>;
 } // namespace cwg202
 
+namespace cwg203 { // cwg203: 3.0
+namespace ex1 {
+struct B {
+  int i;
+};
+struct D1 : B {};
+struct D2 : B {};
+
+int(D1::*pmD1) = &D2::i;
+} // namespace ex1
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace ex2 {
+struct A {
+  int i;
+  virtual void f() = 0; // #cwg203-ex2-A-f
+};
+
+struct B : A {
+  int j;
+  constexpr B() : j(5) {}
+  virtual void f();
+};
+
+struct C : B {
+  constexpr C() { j = 10; }
+};
+
+template <class T>
+constexpr int DefaultValue(int(T::*m)) {
+  return T().*m;
+  // since-cxx20-error@-1 {{allocating an object of abstract class type 
'cwg203::ex2::A'}}
+  //   since-cxx20-note@#cwg203-ex2-a {{in instantiation of function template 
specialization 'cwg203::ex2::DefaultValue<cwg203::ex2::A>' requested here}}
+  //   since-cxx20-note@#cwg203-ex2-A-f {{unimplemented pure virtual method 
'f' in 'A'}}
+} // #cwg203-ex2-DefaultValue
+
+int a = DefaultValue(&B::i); // #cwg203-ex2-a
+static_assert(DefaultValue(&C::j) == 5, "");
+} // namespace ex2
+#endif
+
+namespace ex3 {
+class Base {
+public:
+  int func() const;
+};
+
+class Derived : public Base {};
+
+template <class T> class Templ { // #cwg203-ex3-Templ
+public:
+  template <class S> Templ(S (T::*ptmf)() const); // #cwg203-ex3-Templ-ctor
+};
+
+void foo() { Templ<Derived> x(&Derived::func); }
+// expected-error@-1 {{no matching constructor for initialization of 
'Templ<Derived>'}}
+//   expected-note@#cwg203-ex3-Templ {{candidate constructor (the implicit 
copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'int 
(cwg203::ex3::Base::*)() const' to 'const Templ<Derived>' for 1st argument}}
+//   since-cxx11-note@#cwg203-ex3-Templ {{candidate constructor (the implicit 
move constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'int 
(cwg203::ex3::Base::*)() const' to 'Templ<Derived>' for 1st argument}}
+//   expected-note@#cwg203-ex3-Templ-ctor {{candidate template ignored: could 
not match 'cwg203::ex3::Derived' against 'cwg203::ex3::Base'}}
+} // namespace ex3
+
+namespace ex4 {
+struct Very_base {
+  int a;
+};
+struct Base1 : Very_base {};
+struct Base2 : Very_base {};
+struct Derived : Base1, Base2 {
+};
+
+int f() {
+  Derived d;
+  // FIXME: in the diagnostic below, Very_base is fully qualified, but Derived 
is not
+  int Derived::*a_ptr = &Derived::Base1::a;
+  /* expected-error@-1
+  {{ambiguous conversion from pointer to member of base class 
'cwg203::ex4::Very_base' to pointer to member of derived class 'Derived':
+    struct cwg203::ex4::Derived -> Base1 -> Very_base
+    struct cwg203::ex4::Derived -> Base2 -> Very_base}}*/
+}
+} // namespace ex4
+
+namespace ex5 {
+struct Base {
+  int a;
+};
+struct Derived : Base {
+  int b;
+};
+
+template <typename Class, typename Member_type, Member_type Base::*ptr>
+Member_type get(Class &c) {
+  return c.*ptr;
+}
+
+void call(int (*f)(Derived &)); // #cwg203-ex5-call
+
+int f() {
+  // ill-formed, contrary to Core issue filing:
+  // `&Derived::b` yields `int Derived::*`, which can't initialize NTTP of 
type `int Base::*`,
+  // because (implicit) pointer-to-member conversion doesn't upcast.
+  call(&get<Derived, int, &Derived::b>);
+  // expected-error@-1 {{no matching function for call to 'call'}}
+  //   expected-note@#cwg203-ex5-call {{candidate function not viable: no 
overload of 'get' matching 'int (*)(Derived &)' for 1st argument}}
+
+  // well-formed, contrary to Core issue filing:
+  // `&Derived::a` yields `int Base::*`,
+  // which can initialize NTTP of type `int Base::*`.
+  call(&get<Derived, int, &Derived::a>);
+
+  call(&get<Base, int, &Derived::a>);
+  // expected-error@-1 {{no matching function for call to 'call'}}
+  //   expected-note@#cwg203-ex5-call {{candidate function not viable: no 
overload of 'get' matching 'int (*)(Derived &)' for 1st argument}}
+}
+} // namespace ex5
+
+namespace ex6 {
+struct Base {
+  int a;
+};
+struct Derived : private Base { // #cwg203-ex6-Derived
+public:
+  using Base::a; // make `a` accessible
+};
+
+int f() {
+  Derived d;
+  int b = d.a;
+  // FIXME: in the diagnostic below, Base is fully qualified, but Derived is 
not
+  int Derived::*ptr = &Derived::a;
+  // expected-error@-1 {{cannot cast private base class 'cwg203::ex6::Base' to 
'Derived'}}
+  //   expected-note@#cwg203-ex6-Derived {{declared private here}}
+}
+} // namespace ex6
+} // namespace cwg203
+
 // cwg204: sup 820
 
 namespace cwg206 { // cwg206: 2.7

diff  --git a/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html b/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
index 80a654aa691fa2..70f57a0c00a7f6 100755
--- a/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
+++ b/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ <h2 id="cxxdr">C++ defect report implementation 
status</h2>
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/203.html";>203</a></td>
     <td>NAD</td>
     <td>Type of address-of-member expression</td>
-    <td class="unknown" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Clang 3.0</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="204">
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/204.html";>204</a></td>


        
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to