https://github.com/shiltian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
shiltian wrote:
It seems like we can’t reach consensus on how to move forward with this. I
already worked my issue around so I guess we no longer need this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
https://github.com/peilin-ye updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
>From 8ab5d1c2e36dfa44be637478deeabaa4f586dcee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peilin Ye
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 06:44:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [BPF] Rename isST*() and isLD*() functions in
BPFMISimplifyPat
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/6735
Here is the relevant piec
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113777
>From 78019b9d9dc138f38bb5b32576b621351ae6427c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 01:07:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] prevent assertion failure from an invalid template
ins
https://github.com/c8ef created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113796
None
>From aa9e5c50287aa3d60fe1145ccda6b1e5f90c53a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 14:15:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] add Binary search operations (on sorted ranges)
---
clang/lib/Tooling
https://github.com/c8ef edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (c8ef)
Changes
Fixes #94459.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113796.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Tooling/Inclusions/Stdlib/StdSymbolMap.inc (+4)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Too
https://github.com/c8ef ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/c8ef edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: None (dong-miao)
Changes
This commit adds the Obviating Memory-Management Instructions after Marking
PTEs Valid (Svvptc) extension.
Specification
link:[https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/b
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
Author: None (dong-miao)
Changes
This commit adds the Obviating Memory-Management Instructions after Marking
PTEs Valid (Svvptc) extension.
Specification
link:[https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/src/supervisor.adoc](https://github.c
https://github.com/dong-miao created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113758
This commit adds the Obviating Memory-Management Instructions after Marking
PTEs Valid (Svvptc) extension.
Specification
link:[https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/src/supervisor.adoc](https://
@@ -143,32 +165,33 @@ def _GetSymbols(pool, root_dir, index_page_name,
namespace, variants_to_accept):
with open(index_page_path, "r") as f:
# Read each symbol page in parallel.
results = [] # (symbol_name, promise of [header...])
+symbols_by_page
https://github.com/vvd170501 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612
>From 96662cb7f681e7158c05a0190894de70eee03d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vadim Dudkin
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:18:52 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Update std symbol mapping to v20230810; Move assertion
t
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113368
>From 3dd2f4da57eb164e67fd54b66c09cc8b771ee24f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Kiss
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:48:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [libunwind][AArch64] Protect PC within libunwind's
@@ -232,6 +232,47 @@ SYMBOL(ssize, std::, )
SYMBOL(ssize, std::, )
SYMBOL(ssize, std::, )
SYMBOL(ssize, std::, )
+// C++ [range.access.general]: ... the customization point objects
+// in [range.access] are available when the header is included.
+SYMBOL(begin, std::ranges::, )
MarcelHB wrote:
I'd appreciate this fix, too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111526
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112496
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dong-miao updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113758
>From 6424bebfcf16ef9694d7406b0298045da2d426bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dong-miao <601183...@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 06:49:04 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV]Add svvptc extensions
---
clang/tes
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
Mark the whole StmtExpr invalid when the last statement in compound statement
is invalid.
Because the last statement need to do copy initialization, it causes subsequent
errors to simply ignore last inva
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
https://github.com/philnik777 approved this pull request.
The libc++ LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111434
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/philnik777 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111434
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vvd170501 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81640
>From 1796e5d2c44bae890c13b2af3fc7e4ec36e716dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Schmidt
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:59:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clangd] fix extract-to-function for overloaded operators
https://github.com/5chmidti commented:
CC @HighCommander4 @kadircet
Technically, Sam told me last EuroLLVM that he had some refactor of the
`SelectionTree` that would resolve issues like this in the general case, but as
it is unclear that those changes will get in someday/in the 'near' future
https://github.com/dong-miao updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113758
>From 6424bebfcf16ef9694d7406b0298045da2d426bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dong-miao <601183...@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 06:49:04 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV]Add svvptc extensions
---
clang/tes
@@ -104,9 +104,12 @@ bool isRootStmt(const Node *N) {
// Root statement cannot be partially selected.
if (N->Selected == SelectionTree::Partial)
return false;
- // Only DeclStmt can be an unselected RootStmt since VarDecls claim the
entire
- // selection range in sel
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81640
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vvd170501 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612
>From 853881983faeeb5b7e0582d3e94037c12df12c7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: vvd170501 <36827317+vvd170...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:17:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix variant parsi
https://github.com/dong-miao updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113758
>From 6424bebfcf16ef9694d7406b0298045da2d426bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dong-miao <601183...@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 06:49:04 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV]Add svvptc extensions
---
clang/tes
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vadim D. (vvd170501)
Changes
Fixes #113494
---
Patch is 35.77 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Tooling/Inclusions/Stdlib/St
@@ -352,20 +383,23 @@ SYMBOL(get, std::, /*no headers*/)
// providing the type.
SYMBOL(make_error_code, std::, /*no headers*/)
SYMBOL(make_error_condition, std::, /*no headers*/)
+// Similar to std::get, has variants for multiple containers
+// (vector, deque, list, etc.)
+SYMB
https://github.com/vvd170501 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/10701
Here is the relevant piec
mstorsjo wrote:
> > Actually this PR is the case of
> > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/3908, not #113491
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> Are you able to dig up any of the cmake configure logs from these builds, so
> that we can figure out how this ends up breaking things? Becau
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg279_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg279_A.pcm
+// RUN: %clang
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg279_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg279_A.pcm
+// RUN: %clang
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpfel -mcpu=v4 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding \
+; RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-LE %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpfeb -mcpu=v4 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding \
+; RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-BE %s
+
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpfel -mcpu=v4 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding \
+; RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-LE %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpfeb -mcpu=v4 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding \
+; RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-BE %s
+
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 74e1554d7b4013a975cf5fb8df64a6419bb14a45
9a8172cd4168e4b9b45a9f973ab34aa1266816f8 --e
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113777
Fixes #113324
>From 78019b9d9dc138f38bb5b32576b621351ae6427c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 01:07:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] prevent assertion failure from an invali
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oleksandr T. (a-tarasyuk)
Changes
Fixes #113324
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113777.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+2)
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cp
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpfel -mcpu=v4 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding \
+; RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-LE %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpfeb -mcpu=v4 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding \
+; RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-BE %s
+
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ bool Sema::SetMemberAccessSpecifier(NamedDecl *MemberDecl,
AccessSpecifier LexicalAS) {
if (!PrevMemberDecl) {
// Use the lexical access specifier.
-MemberDecl->setAccess(LexicalAS);
a-tarasyuk wro
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+SelectionDAG &D
https://github.com/bogner edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bogner approved this pull request.
A few last minor nitpicks, but this LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
@@ -5897,7 +5897,7 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCall(const CGFunctionInfo
&CallInfo,
// Emit any call-associated writebacks immediately. Arguably this
// should happen after any return-value munging.
if (CallArgs.hasWritebacks())
-emitWritebacks(*this, CallArgs);
@@ -5460,9 +5460,8 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitOpaqueValueLValue(const
OpaqueValueExpr *e) {
return getOrCreateOpaqueLValueMapping(e);
}
-void CodeGenFunction::EmitHLSLOutArgExpr(const HLSLOutArgExpr *E,
- CallArgList &Args, QualTy
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
bogner wrote:
Are these assertions actually autogenerated? They look like they've been
written by hand to me (which is fine, but if that's the case
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 10 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/7599
Here is the r
Martin =?utf-8?q?Storsjö?= ,Thomas Fransham
,davidtrevelyan
,
Andrzej =?utf-8?q?Warzyński?= ,Louis Dionne
,Alex =?utf-8?q?Rønne?= Petersen ,lntue
,Shih-Po Hung ,Peng Liu
,Peng Liu
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/winner245 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113727
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113760
Mark the whole StmtExpr invalid when the last statement in compound statement
is invalid.
Because the last statement need to do copy initialization, it causes subsequent
errors to simply ignore last invalid
isuckatcs wrote:
@steakhal I wanted to wait for the pipeline to pass before merging. Shouldn't
we only merge patches with a green pipeline?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
Martin =?utf-8?q?Storsjö?= ,Thomas Fransham
,davidtrevelyan
,
Andrzej =?utf-8?q?Warzyński?= ,Louis Dionne
,Alex =?utf-8?q?Rønne?= Petersen ,lntue
,Shih-Po Hung ,Peng Liu
,Peng Liu
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found iss
Author: isuckatcs
Date: 2024-10-26T17:41:55+02:00
New Revision: a917ae0b4fc0d792ee0e2c512c4ea539f98e1204
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a917ae0b4fc0d792ee0e2c512c4ea539f98e1204
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a917ae0b4fc0d792ee0e2c512c4ea539f98e1204.diff
LOG
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
> @steakhal I wanted to wait for the pipeline to pass before merging. Shouldn't
> we only merge patches with a green pipeline?
The full pipeline will never be green. Downstream I wouldn't do this, but here
I think we did what is reasonable. Waited enough. We can always revert w
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot12`
while building `clang,compiler-rt,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/3099
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff d906ac52ab8ee46090a6696f4ffb34c40ee6abb7
68f3617027fa09b531b5e3eaea6a025c6783a258 --e
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113394
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/marlamb created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113771
Projects exist, which do not want to use an automated formatting, but
could benefit from sorting the includes, especially to include the main
headers first in order to improve the self-consistency of headers.
Wh
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
@@ -83,12 +83,210 @@ entry:
ret i64 %0
}
-declare half @llvm.dx.clamp.f16(half, half, half)
-declare float @llvm.dx.clamp.f32(float, float, float)
-declare double @llvm.dx.clamp.f64(double, double, double)
-declare i16 @llvm.dx.clamp.i16(i16, i16, i16)
-declare i32 @llvm.dx.
marlamb wrote:
The PR as of now is far from being complete, but before putting the effort in
adding tests/documentation etc. it would be great to have some feedback, if the
feature is seen worth being offered and if the proposal looks roughly
acceptable. I have to admit I am not really happy a
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vvd170501 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113612
>From 489d258577552cde839f0949a1ce24d4b1f72103 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: vvd170501 <36827317+vvd170...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:17:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix variant parsi
https://github.com/jaidTw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112477
>From fe4a28fb691b69d9af384f1dc2f0667761adef44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Huang
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:11:06 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang][RISCV] Support -fcf-protection=return for RISC-V
---
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/11107
Here is the relevant piec
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ SYMBOL(aligned_union_t, std::, )
SYMBOL(alignment_of, std::, )
SYMBOL(alignment_of_v, std::, )
SYMBOL(all_of, std::, )
-SYMBOL(allocate_at_least, std::, )
vvd170501 wrote:
Was replaced with `std::allocator_traits<>::allocate_at_least` in
[
https://github.com/dong-miao updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113758
>From 6424bebfcf16ef9694d7406b0298045da2d426bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dong-miao <601183...@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 06:49:04 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [RISCV]Add svvptc extensions
---
clang/tes
Author: davidtrevelyan
Date: 2024-10-26T13:06:11+01:00
New Revision: 4102625380823e58d7b13f01b5bd979a29bce19e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4102625380823e58d7b13f01b5bd979a29bce19e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4102625380823e58d7b13f01b5bd979a29bce19e.diff
https://github.com/davidtrevelyan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113155
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gedare wrote:
> > There will be bugs if/when people use this option with small values for the
> > limit, as it will interact weirdly with both the braced list initializer
> > formatting rules, and also with the `AvoidBinPacking` logic of the
> > continuation indenter.
>
> Can you give some ex
gedare wrote:
So it turns out that this buggy behavior I'm seeing is also present in
unmodified clang-format when the first item in the list is longer than the rest
of the items. For example:
```
echo "vector x{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
https://github.com/philnik777 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113765
This is required to avoid macro clashing when using attributes like
`[[msvc::no_unique_address]]`.
This patch also refactor the logic for attribute scope __uglification__ into a
single place to make it easi
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
>From b23ce76d3db79eab6433bef1bd3fc9d26bcb3309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:05:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][NFC] Add test for CWG issues about linkage in
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg279_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg279_A.pcm
+// RUN: %clang
dougsonos wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109855
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg279_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg279_A.pcm
+// RUN: %clang
BenBlumer wrote:
I'm a bit of a outsider to the LLVM project, but I'd say a fix to a broken,
already shipped, feature now is better than a general fix down the line.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024, 3:23 AM Julian Schmidt ***@***.***>
wrote:
> ***@***. commented on this pull request.
>
> CC @HighComma
https://github.com/5chmidti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81640
>From 1796e5d2c44bae890c13b2af3fc7e4ec36e716dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Schmidt
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:59:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clangd] fix extract-to-function for overloaded operators
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113784
I'm planning to migrate StringRef to std::string_view
eventually. Since std::string_view does not have slice, this patch
migrates slice(0, N) to substr(0, N).
>From aafa1a3f55712b6f278190bc87bef414a04d2b
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
I'm planning to migrate StringRef to std::string_view
eventually. Since std::string_view does not have slice, this patch
migrates slice(0, N) to substr(0, N).
---
Ful
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113785
None
>From ff68ca5f76a9c005b6a3016c041ad8fb83f47602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 04:09:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode][NFC] Make CheckVolatile
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113786
We can check isStatic() early here and save ourselves some work.
>From e759b44c22bcdd374550929c0c673d414f30e4ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 04:08:52 +010
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113785.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp (+2-2)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
We can check isStatic() early here and save ourselves some work.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113786.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp (+1-1)
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
