@@ -1104,12 +1104,22 @@ RecordStorageLocation *getBaseObjectLocation(const
MemberExpr &ME,
return Env.get(*Base);
}
-std::vector getFieldsForInitListExpr(const RecordDecl *RD) {
+std::vector
+getFieldsForInitListExpr(const InitListExpr *InitList) {
+ const RecordDecl *RD =
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82348
>From fc41d1efdcff94857e7ccd3b8a1a75c3e83a84ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:57:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][dataflow] Correctly handle `InitListExpr` of
u
@@ -731,6 +723,18 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
FieldLocs.insert({Field, &Loc});
}
+// In the case of a union, we don't in general have initializers for all
+// of the fields. Create storage locations for the remaining fields (but
+
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81842
From 0f836d8e63f462f57784e62bcd87ac1f4f5a3d00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:56:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Change modeling of 'f
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
>From 05dbfac2043c22bdb73d5f09221421209bfe1f22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:29:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] [SemaCXX] Disallow deducing "this" on operator `new`
and `d
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-02-21T09:18:01+01:00
New Revision: 1246b64faa5eea1553c1c1aad425c31b701fa6ea
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1246b64faa5eea1553c1c1aad425c31b701fa6ea
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1246b64faa5eea1553c1c1aad425c31b701fa6ea.diff
L
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Rajveer100 wrote:
@cor3ntin
I have mistakenly added a merge commit, let me fix that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
>From 05dbfac2043c22bdb73d5f09221421209bfe1f22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:29:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] [SemaCXX] Disallow deducing "this" on operator `new`
and `d
Rajveer100 wrote:
> @Rajveer100 you need us to merge that for you?
I am not sure what you meant by this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
Author: kadir çetinkaya
Date: 2024-02-21T09:52:19+01:00
New Revision: 50373506d570f3db1e1af7c13d46409736452f3a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50373506d570f3db1e1af7c13d46409736452f3a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50373506d570f3db1e1af7c13d46409736452f3a.dif
https://github.com/kadircet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82291
>From 0a8cfb11a601e7a6ec59489b8ac15c40136002b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:12:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker] Allow a variable
declaration
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82305
>From 8e9b4433df511e9982d181a5c18262208a72177d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:29:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker] Don't assume
local varia
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82229
>From 099640652b62c52160b12542a16eb66da90cfc93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 01:07:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [alpha.webkit.UncountedLocalVarsChecker] Allow uncounted
object refe
rniwa wrote:
> I want to spend a bit more time thinking whether this has to go into every
> callback, maybe it can be a set-and-forget thing? (Probably not.)
What do you mean by set-and-forget?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82229
___
cfe
martinboehme wrote:
CI failure appears to be an infrastructure issue. Patch cleanly builds and
tests locally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82348
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82348
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-02-21T10:10:25+01:00
New Revision: 4725993f1a812c86b9ad79d229a015d0216ff550
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4725993f1a812c86b9ad79d229a015d0216ff550
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4725993f1a812c86b9ad79d229a015d0216ff550.diff
gamesh411 wrote:
I checked many false positives, even those that were not FP at first sight; I
think we can live without them.
I also agree that we should strive to handle comparison evaluation more
uniformly and preferably behind the API barrier of the constraint manager.
LGTM
https://github.
https://github.com/gamesh411 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81034
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3391,7 +3391,10 @@ def fno_openmp : Flag<["-"], "fno-openmp">,
Group,
def fopenmp_version_EQ : Joined<["-"], "fopenmp-version=">, Group,
Flags<[NoArgumentUnused]>,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option, FlangOption, FC1Option]>,
- HelpText<"Set OpenMP version (e.g. 45 fo
Zonotora wrote:
> Precommit CI seems to have found some related failures that should be
> investigated. I'd love to hear opinions from the codegen code owners on this,
> as well as @zygoloid as UBSan code owner. I'm not opposed to the changes,
> though I do find it somewhat strange to add them
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
1. Model `getc`, `vfscanf`, `putc`, `vfprintf`.
2. `fscanf` invalidates all arguments after the format string.
Also, add tests for `ftello` and `fseeko`.
From a21881d82fe3674b344d4a3807e9d2
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón (alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource)
Changes
1. Model `getc`, `vfscanf`, `putc`, `vfprintf`.
2. `fscanf` invalidates all arguments after the format string.
Also, add tests for `ftello` and `fseeko`.
-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón (alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource)
Changes
1. Model `getc`, `vfscanf`, `putc`, `vfprintf`.
2. `fscanf` invalidates all arguments after the format string.
Also, add tests for `ftello` and `fseeko`.
---
Full diff: http
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81860
>From 2e3d7fbcf759230cf83487c60aabca5104a7f379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:17:20 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Added feature dependencies for SME2p1 to
TargetPars
nikic wrote:
I think this commit is responsible for the ClangIncludeCleaner test failure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
Author: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: 2024-02-21T11:15:42+01:00
New Revision: 3533fe783df4b417f16077edb70099010d2d7eef
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3533fe783df4b417f16077edb70099010d2d7eef
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3533fe783df4b417f16077edb70099010d2d7eef.dif
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79116
>From 0ea3b2be9d364a042c7e7114b0f72fc3c144d2a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:14:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] MIPS/clang: Fix asm constraint for softfloat
This include 2 fixes:
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+; RUN: llc -march=mips < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MIPS32
+; RUN: llc -march=mips64 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MIPS64
+
+define dso_local void @read_double(double* nocapture noundef readonly %0)
local_unnamed_addr #0 {
wzssyqa w
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple mips -target-feature +soft-float
-DSOFT_FLOAT_NO_CONSTRAINT_F -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+#ifdef SOFT_FLOAT_NO_CONSTRAINT_F
+void read_float(float* p) {
wzssyqa wrote:
Oh, yes. we can use `float p` here.
https://githu
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79116
>From 838394878054831066e563fa243665ba6d68d824 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:14:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] MIPS/clang: Fix asm constraint for softfloat
This include 2 fixes:
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78169
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -178,17 +181,29 @@ RValue
CodeGenFunction::EmitNVPTXDevicePrintfCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) {
E, this, GetVprintfDeclaration(CGM.getModule()), false);
}
+// Deterimines if an argument is a string
+static bool isString(const clang::Type *argXTy) {
vik
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81860
>From 2e3d7fbcf759230cf83487c60aabca5104a7f379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:17:20 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Added feature dependencies for SME2p1 to
TargetPars
https://github.com/balazske commented:
How does this relate to the other PR #79470 (why comes this new patch when
there is another for the same problem)?
I think it is better to first commit #79470, then add remaining functions
`getc`, `putc`, `vfscanf`, `vfprintf`. These should be added anyway
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat commented:
Looks good overall, I only have a few small suggestions/questions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
@@ -171,14 +173,34 @@ using FnCheck = std::function;
using ArgNoTy = unsigned int;
-static const ArgNoTy ArgNone = std::numeric_limits::max();
+const ArgNoTy ArgNone = std::numeric_limits::max();
struct FnDescription {
FnCheck PreFn;
FnCheck EvalFn;
ArgNoTy StreamAr
@@ -339,3 +363,107 @@ void fflush_on_open_failed_stream(void) {
}
fclose(F);
}
+
+void test_fscanf_eof() {
+ FILE *F1 = tmpfile();
+ if (!F1)
+return;
+
+ int a;
+ unsigned b;
+ int ret = fscanf(F1, "%d %u", &a, &b);
+ char c = fgetc(F1); // expected-warning {{Rea
@@ -171,14 +173,34 @@ using FnCheck = std::function;
using ArgNoTy = unsigned int;
-static const ArgNoTy ArgNone = std::numeric_limits::max();
+const ArgNoTy ArgNone = std::numeric_limits::max();
NagyDonat wrote:
Why is this change incorporated in this commit?
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -396,6 +418,18 @@ class StreamChecker : public Checkerhttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -396,6 +418,18 @@ class StreamChecker : public Checkerhttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81869
>From a996499580066213c3437cbb96735b7404291c3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:52:22 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [flang][clang] Add Visibility specific help text for
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-02-21T13:09:20+01:00
New Revision: b1080e187e91576ac6d44087f072583e101f0f51
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1080e187e91576ac6d44087f072583e101f0f51
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1080e187e91576ac6d44087f072583e101f0f51.diff
LO
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3391,7 +3391,10 @@ def fno_openmp : Flag<["-"], "fno-openmp">,
Group,
def fopenmp_version_EQ : Joined<["-"], "fopenmp-version=">, Group,
Flags<[NoArgumentUnused]>,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option, FlangOption, FC1Option]>,
- HelpText<"Set OpenMP version (e.g. 45 fo
Author: Lukacma
Date: 2024-02-21T12:29:28Z
New Revision: 02e17ab1b97a8c0dc22facc8c66850e5aca28b60
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02e17ab1b97a8c0dc22facc8c66850e5aca28b60
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02e17ab1b97a8c0dc22facc8c66850e5aca28b60.diff
LOG: [AArc
https://github.com/Lukacma closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@Lukacma Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a build,
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Rajveer100 wrote:
Considering the PR sounds good to you, yes it would be great to have it merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource wrote:
> How does this relate to the other PR #79470 (why comes this new patch when
> there is another for the same problem)? I think it is better to first commit
> #79470, then add remaining functions `getc`, `putc`, `vfscanf`, `vfprintf`.
> These should be added
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-02-21T14:15:39+01:00
New Revision: b5437c8ab2af277548ee59b6838e365d35a0d926
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b5437c8ab2af277548ee59b6838e365d35a0d926
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b5437c8ab2af277548ee59b6838e365d35a0d926.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79753
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82358
>From 15d9428a47ea5d7ba3b4ffd2e766406b16d781e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:44:04 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Implement CWG1719 "Layout compatibility and
cv-
@@ -339,3 +363,107 @@ void fflush_on_open_failed_stream(void) {
}
fclose(F);
}
+
+void test_fscanf_eof() {
+ FILE *F1 = tmpfile();
+ if (!F1)
+return;
+
+ int a;
+ unsigned b;
+ int ret = fscanf(F1, "%d %u", &a, &b);
+ char c = fgetc(F1); // expected-warning {{Rea
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476
From a21881d82fe3674b344d4a3807e9d2590c98ce93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:28:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -S -target-feature +sme
-verify -DTEST_NONE -x c %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -S -target-feature +sme
-verify -DTEST_COMPATIBLE -x c %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -S -target-feature +sme
-verify -DTEST_NONE -x c %s
sdesmalen-arm wrote:
Doing `-x c` on a .c file is redundant, as it's already interpreted as a C
source file.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
@@ -814,6 +820,43 @@ Address AArch64ABIInfo::EmitMSVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Address VAListAddr,
/*allowHigherAlign*/ false);
}
+static bool isStreaming(const FunctionDecl *F) {
+ if (F->hasAttr())
+return true;
+ if (const auto *T = F->getTy
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Thanks for resolving my comments.
FYI if I forget about a PR (that I promise to come back on the next day) - feel
free to ping it or explicitly push the "request review" button.
Wait for
@@ -763,6 +779,11 @@ void StreamChecker::evalFreadFwrite(const FnDescription
*Desc,
return;
}
+ // At read, invalidate the buffer in any case of error or success,
+ // except if EOF was already present.
+ if (IsFread && (OldSS->ErrorState != ErrorFEof))
+State =
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-02-21T15:25:55+01:00
New Revision: 91ebd010aa76a711abd88f74ecca8e82e15b23cd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91ebd010aa76a711abd88f74ecca8e82e15b23cd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91ebd010aa76a711abd88f74ecca8e82e15b23cd.diff
LO
https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zahiraam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81514
>From 13fd73932251843173cbbc31ca93905ca0469277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ammarguellat
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:58:19 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [CLANG] Full support of complex multiplication and
division.
Author: Rajveer Singh Bharadwaj
Date: 2024-02-21T15:30:49+01:00
New Revision: f7c2e5fa05d221a3dfc53744f353517407c2ffec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7c2e5fa05d221a3dfc53744f353517407c2ffec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7c2e5fa05d221a3dfc53744f353517407c2
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
Thanks for working on this!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2393,6 +2391,17 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
Kind))
return false;
}
+} else if (!Constructor->isDelegatingConstructor()) {
mahtohappy wr
@@ -2343,17 +2349,9 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// - if the class is a union having variant members, exactly one of them
// shall be initialized;
mahtohappy wrote:
I'll add the references.
https
@@ -2471,6 +2480,23 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool
+checkUnionConstructorIntializer(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
mahtohappy wrote:
DiagUnionMemberConstExprCtorInitial
https://github.com/zahiraam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67592
>From 55b67a58ef8b9856e5f0a8f535b8617f59711dec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ammarguellat
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:59:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] Fix value of __FUNCTION__ and __func__ in MSVC mode.
---
https://github.com/mahtohappy edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81225
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zahiraam wrote:
@AaronBallman I removed the field that I added in the policy and tried to use
the existing ones. That broke a few LIT tests but before fixing them I want to
check with you if the combination of policy I have added in the unittest is
correct. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/ll
https://github.com/JonChesterfield approved this pull request.
I like this a lot, thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
@@ -2471,6 +2480,23 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool
+checkUnionConstructorIntializer(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
+const CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor,
@@ -814,6 +820,43 @@ Address AArch64ABIInfo::EmitMSVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Address VAListAddr,
/*allowHigherAlign*/ false);
}
+static bool isStreaming(const FunctionDecl *F) {
+ if (F->hasAttr())
+return true;
+ if (const auto *T = F->getTy
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77936
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2471,6 +2480,23 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool
+checkUnionConstructorIntializer(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
+const CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor,
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-02-21T19:02:20+04:00
New Revision: 73185854a3fc469b7d3e21d0b5d2ecb5ee15d201
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73185854a3fc469b7d3e21d0b5d2ecb5ee15d201
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73185854a3fc469b7d3e21d0b5d2ecb5ee15d201.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Sorry for losing track of the discussion here. What is the current status here?
Should we run another round of testing?
Also, I see proposals to land the new behaviour under a flag and have it off by
default.
If that does not add a lot of complexity, that would definitely
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81335
>From 63f3ada705b69c27ca37207c6f7e8098896602b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:51:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ObjC] Add pre-commi
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82496
See the comments added to the code for details on the inaccuracies that have
now been fixed.
The patch adds tests that fail with the old implementation.
>From 5c3df2b3151a8093e60f5fe79dcadc72a237d0ef Mon Se
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81335
>From 63f3ada705b69c27ca37207c6f7e8098896602b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:51:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ObjC] Add pre-commi
https://github.com/TIFitis created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82497
This patch removes the complex reduction variables codegen. There are currently
no tests for this, and from playing around with some complex reduction variable
test cases the code seems unreachable.
The PR #803
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Akash Banerjee (TIFitis)
Changes
This patch removes the complex reduction variables codegen. There are currently
no tests for this, and from playing around with some complex reduction variable
test cases the code seems unreachable.
The P
@@ -2099,9 +2099,11 @@ static __inline__ __m128i __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS
_mm_add_epi64(__m128i __a,
}
/// Adds, with saturation, the corresponding elements of two 128-bit
-///signed [16 x i8] vectors, saving each sum in the corresponding element
of
-///a 128-bit result ve
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -S -target-feature +sme
-verify -DTEST_NONE -x c %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -S -target-feature +sme
-verify -DTEST_COMPATIBLE -x c %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77936
>From 7314429a203900a8f555e1b0471fdd4cfd4d8d03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Tebbs
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:57:04 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] [Clang][SME] Detect always_inline used with mismatched
s
@@ -814,6 +820,43 @@ Address AArch64ABIInfo::EmitMSVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Address VAListAddr,
/*allowHigherAlign*/ false);
}
+static bool isStreaming(const FunctionDecl *F) {
+ if (F->hasAttr())
+return true;
+ if (const auto *T = F->getTy
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
Nice work! Quite subtle...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82496
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
